Jump to content
 

Richy59

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Richy59

  1. On 22/04/2024 at 13:51, MistaMatthews said:

    Just taken delivery of a set of these. Immediate observations are that they are a perfect match for the WCRC pullmans which was to be expected. The colour is indistinguishable to my eyes from the standard Bachmann maroon mk1’s. The previous mk2 from Bachmann just doesn’t sit right with me so that has now been ejected from the rake. Tooling hasn’t really changed apart from the removal of end steps, so the NEM pockets are still in the incorrect position. Coupled up with Hornby 20mm magnetic couplings gives a nice close coupling and ease of placing / removing stock.

    IMG_3783.jpeg

    IMG_3784.jpeg

     

    Do you know if the newley released Mk2 from Bachmann (39-354) is a better match than the older model?

  2. 16 minutes ago, Willl said:

    Fortunately the glazing is just painted over - I've taken the bold step of guinea-pigging removing the paint and it comes off just fine leaving the glazing underneath (using, of all things, toothpaste and a cotton buds - my ruston will also be the most minty fresh of all)

     

    The side 'windows' (if they still count as windows when painted over) have actually got some nice lining on so I may leave them as is. My conscience is happy with the rear windows clear as I think the little 1/76th high drivers would find that sufficient.

    Will

    20240410_222610.jpg


    Is the glazing easy enough to remove? Looks like a good option for adding the windows - even though they should have been clear in the first place.

     

    i was going to question the difference in paint colours between the top/bonnet and the lower section of the sides, as in my model there is definitely a green tinge to the yellow. However looking at NHY 581’s picture, this looks to be pretty accurate.

     

    IMG_0484.jpeg.f9c04ff28b08db73838f39987ff66d1f.jpeg

    • Like 2
  3. 20 hours ago, russ p said:

    I'd get really sick of that bloke shouting ease up everytime that uncoupling device is used. I hate to hear voices on dcc sound. Or other stupid sounds that aren't there in real life. My accurascale 37 is ruined by an AWS horn everytime it changes direction 

     

    I asked in the live stream if the shunter voice could be muted and they replied saying it can be. Not sure if it's set to a specific CV and you can just set the volume to zero, or if it will be an alt function.

    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  4. On 23/01/2024 at 21:05, JSpencer said:

     The DCC address can only be determined via a classic DCC controler. You can enter 9017 as your number on the app, but this is purely facultive and is not enregistered as a DCC address. Indeed, they are all 0003 until you change it under DCC control (not blue tooth).

     

    I just finished converting three 15 year old Bachmann models (9F, 5MT and 4MT). All the 8 pins plug straight in with the smallest sugar cube sound box supplied fitted. There is no space (except maybe the 5MT) for power pack but all run fine. This was not so straight forwards 10 years ago. Indeed I fitted a TTS to another Bachmann 9F which required surgery to run wires from the loco (where the chip was) to the tender (where the speaker was placed). TXS fitting is far simpler.

     

    I can't comment on your experience, but that isn't what I have found to be the case. I change the address on the app and it is the correct address on my dcc controller - an ACE-2.

     

    I can just type the address into my dcc controller and - as long as I have the TXS decoder in DCC mode - it just starts working. I can put it on the programming track and it reads the correct address.

  5. I eventually managed to get them to work on my DCC controller like the other TXS decoders I have, but it took for me putting them on the programming track and manually entering an address. For whatever reason - and the other decoders don't do this - the address was different when being read by the DCC controller compared to what I entered on the app. 

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  6. Anybody know how to make the sound work in both ends of an HST via Bluetooth. So far I can only work out setting them up as individual locos and then the sounds work independently. Unless I am missing something obvious, both of them have same MTU profile installed as well.

     

    I have set them to same address for DCC but neither of them is working via my DCC controller (others are fine) and I can't figure out how to make them a consist via the App.

  7. 9 hours ago, ruggedpeak said:

    They've just put double points on the NY sale items, is that a sign of desperation or that Points work? Given that you can now buy a Rail Adventure HST set for £217 and get £43 worth of points back it is an attractive proposition. It certainly seems Points are popular with some on RMWeb. And it is an integral part of Hornby's CRM operation to develop direct sales, refered to in their latest trading update, which overall is working based on the update.

     

    Right now I am tempted by the RA HST's. Buy those, hope the sale rumbles on until the points 'go live' and then get a TfW 67 for about £70. If the sale ends before that then the points will be used for a FLIRT. We don't have any data but no signs that the Points scheme is failing yet.

     

    I'm actually a little annoyed about this, I bought the RailAdventure set on sale when it first started and it's only been out the box for a brief test run. I'd have happily waited for douple points to buy it, and I'm well past my 2 week returns window.

  8. I don’t usually ‘bash’ his reviews as I do find them informative and can be interesting especially when he takes them apart and goes into good mechanical details of locomotives, but I agree with the comments on his torque measurement.
     

    At the end he seems to measure the 2MT as being able to pull 20 coaches before its constantly wheel slipping, but sticking a finger in front of it and applying power means he knows it has low torque. 

     

    It did seem to be geared for lower speeds at 50% power, and he shows it has decent speed at 100%.

     

    In the end it gets 4/5 stars across his ‘scores’ except one 3 star rating, and he gives it an overall score of ‘D’ which seems really low for a locomotive he was overall quite positive about. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 3
  9. On 09/01/2024 at 16:02, Sweetling Park said:

    I also noticed that there doesn't appear to be a Collector Club locomotive this year.  I am wondering if it may be announced later in the year, or if the focus is in the 70th anniversary locos?


    I just read this in the latest issue of Railway Modeller, they seem to be doing a preserved version of Locomotion as the Collectors Club loco for 2024.

    IMG_9031.jpeg

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  10. Recently got my new blue tanks out for a run alongside batch 1, and discovered they don’t seem to just be a re-run as expected but a lot of the detailing and separately fitted parts are a lot more refined and with better detail. Things like the hazard signs and such are much more vibrant and a bit clearer. 
     

    I’ve noticed the new gratings on the top are a bit warped compared to the first batch, but it’s almost as if they are a little too long compared to the space available.

     

    Also, but it’s hard to see in the picture, the blue is a different shade. Quite vibrant compared to the first run. A little disappointed as I sold one of my batch 1 blue tanks to get two of the batch 2 blue wagons so I had different running numbers and it’s quite stand out different now.
     

    Batch 1 had extra decals for changing numbers and other extras, batch 2 doesn’t seem to have that. Not a big deal, just of note.

     

    My favourite wagons I have by far, mostly because I live near the line for Grangemouth refinery and see these behind the Colas 70 very often. I have more blue tanks now than needed but I like having equal numbers.

     

    IMG_8978.jpeg

    IMG_8979.jpeg

    • Like 2
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  11. 54 minutes ago, surfsup said:

    Now, the First Great Western Local Lines 153 is an interesting choice (and for me, potentially welcome choice) - It's been requested for some time, but we're often knocked back with "it's too complicated" despite RealTrack giving it a go on their 143. However, given the poor quality control we saw with the ScotRail 153, it is one I'll sadly have to hold back on until I see one in the flesh. 

     

    Now, if Hornby can finally give it a crack, over to you Bachmann - It's your turn with the 158 & 153 now! 

    Exactly what I was thinking, given the mess of the ScotRail 153. However, they got it right with the livery application for the older Northern Rail Star livery on the 153s so…you never know!

    IMG_8991.png

    • Like 1
  12. Looking back at all the other photos and even the Hornby pictures there is evident seams along the boilers on all the models from what I can tell, which doesn't exist on the plastic body.

     

    I thought it was maybe a real life quirk that has been missed all these years, but it seems that isn't the case and the diecast mould is joined at two different areas across the top of the body.

  13. Little bit dissapointed they are stopping the range so quickly, maybe time to just pick up some of the sets. My little one is only 2 and he's just a bit young for OO sizes and fidelity of getting them onto the tracks, although he's handy with the Thomas TrackMaster stuff. Seemed ripe for expansion, although did think something may have been up with the lack of updates recently. Looks like the unreleased items like 'Scottie' etc have been cancelled as well.

     

    New management clearing house...

     

     

  14. Was half expecting them to announce the 0-4-0 chassis with a decoder socket in it, would have been a good opportunity to tie it in with the 70th Anniversary tank engines.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  15. 7 minutes ago, Michanglais said:

    Quite surprised at no LNER 'Swallow' class 91 + Mk4s, I'd have thought they would have gone down quite well.

     

    Me too, also suprised a Colas Class 43 pack hasn't been produced, seems like an easy seller for modern image modellers.

    • Agree 5
  16. Have to admit. first year I've felt it's been a bit of a let down and underwheming. Actually nothing I can think of pre-ordering except the Christmas Wagon and maybe the GBRF 67, but it has went back to Colas livery already...

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    • Funny 1
  17. 15 minutes ago, micklner said:

    Simply send it back . Is the mould line of the Boiler side really that bad ?  The broken part is the Speedo Bracket.

    I probably will, maybe get a replacement first and see how it is.

     

    You know, I hadn’t really noticed the mould line in the boiler being different, but it’s the same on both sides. I don’t know if it is a mould line being diecast or not though. Another angle of it beside the plastic A4.

    IMG_8935.jpeg

    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  18. I hadn’t opened my UoSA as it arrived over new year period and was a bit busy, so checked it after seeing the photos of the damaged fronts. Luckily mine isn’t damaged, but there is excess glue all around the front number plate area.

     

    I found a piece of detailing broken off, it’s also got a black mark I can’t remove on the top of the body and the lining is a bit sloppy tbh.

     

    Normally I wouldn’t be too bothered, touch of glue on the detailing and can oversee the paint job, but at £320 for a premium model I’m not sure I want to overlook these blemishes.


    Doesn’t help that I bought a second hand like new green A4 for £100 at Warley and it’s as good if not in better nick than the Dublo. It’s not diecast, but other than the seam along the top of the boiler it ain’t half bad.

     

    Maybe I’m just trying to justify not keeping it, as I don’t feel it’s worth the money overall. I’ve been after a good modern UoSA so many years and I thought this would be perfect.

    IMG_8931.jpeg

    IMG_8932.jpeg

    IMG_8933.jpeg

    IMG_8929.jpeg

    IMG_8937.jpeg

     

    • Friendly/supportive 3
  19. 5 hours ago, SteveM666 said:

    No, that will completely knacker the decoder.

    Better to wait until the 2nd generation decoders come along. No idea of timescales but they have been designed and signed off but component availability is an issue.

    As to the V1 - I fitted mine by removing the screws from the mounting socket, clipping in the decoder then a wrap of Kapton tape and leaving the whole lot free to float inside the body at an angle rather than parallel to the chassis.


    To be honest I never thought or noticed screws holding the socket in place, so I’ll have a look at that first.

     

    i wasn’t planning totally removing the antenna, just cutting it down slightly so the body fit over. Would maybe only be taking half of the board off.

  20. Has anybody taken the drastic step of cutting down a Next18 board? I watched Jenny Kirk’s video on removing the little plug sockets, but I’m looking to remove the antenna area of the board.

     

    Going by the traces on the board it only looks like the antenna is attached to the end of the board, so I’m wondering if I can cut it down to shorten the chip it’ll still work.

     

    Trying to fit it into a Bachmann V1 and it works well, but it’s too long to shut the body now at its standard length.

×
×
  • Create New...