Jump to content
RMweb
 

Rudititanic

Members
  • Posts

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rudititanic

  1. Newly completed: the Caledonian Railway McIntosh 439 Class.  Two versions have been made; one in their main format and the second with light modifications (such as pipework) as on preserved class member No. 419.

    https://www.shapeways.com/product/CTD4WR66N/n-gauge-caledonian-railway-439-class-v1

    https://www.shapeways.com/product/8FESH7SSF/n-gauge-caledonian-railway-439-class-v2-preserved

    CaleyTankPic.jpg

    • Like 3
  2. 33 minutes ago, Rosie Taylor said:

    Ah, visiting in person makes a lot of sense. Thats a possibility for me - a little far, but perhaps cheaper than ordering scans. Interesting that two drawings are different, I guess the only sure way is to look at photos as you say (especially with a locomotive like Leader). I'm starting to understand the massive amount of work and expertise that goes into designing models such as yours, will be following with interest!

     

    The original drawings have variations through modifications, but as for differences I meant the often-reproduced plans made for modellers.  Photos are always the safest for accuracy!  Thanks. :)

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  3. 27 minutes ago, Rosie Taylor said:

    This is absolutely amazing! Can I ask how you translated drawings into your 3d model? I've been having fun with my own resin printer and am trying to design my own super-detailed version of the leader for bigger scales, so far the drawings I'm working from are a bit rough. How did you get drawings from the NRM, order scans etc?

     

    Your shop is great - as mentioned I'm more into printing my own designs but I think I'll definetely be looking at buying your Crampton loco in the future...

     

    Thanks.  The NRM drawings were accessed in-person and measured/photographed rather than scans per se, and with the main dimensions drawn in it was then a case of comparing many photos to get/confirm the details (where no measurements, using like-for-like distances between known loco parts).  The biggest challenge was that the two main model overview drawings are both wrong, and in different ways!  Conversely the biggest success was finding a scarce image of the firebox roof area, revealing differences from what was commonly assumed.  As a commission I ultimately developed Leader in O and 00 before amending to N for myself which aided its overall fineness.  

     

    Good luck, hope this helps, and thanks for looking at my site.

     

    • Informative/Useful 2
  4. Having been completed in N, a 00 variant of Agenoria/Stourbridge Lion has ben worked on.  Rescaling is not as easy as some might think as parts can get excessively thick (or thin in the other direction) so every part has to be overhauled as can be seen in this comparison of re-scaled N (right) versus refined 00.

    https://www.shapeways.com/product/ZJCY3TTE6/00-scale-agenoria-stourbridge-lion-loco

     

     

    #Agenoria00Comparison.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Craftsmanship/clever 5
  5. 32 minutes ago, Bluebell Model Railway said:



    Unfortunately they are already in production so there won't be any changes... the wheels seen on the other page are for the production models going to customers.
    As stated above many tried to help, especially those better connected with research.. they didn't listen.
    So what we get is what we get...

    I have even started designing various parts that I can modify the model with, even possibly going as far as a whole new body shell.

     

    Such a pity, though historians often get overlooked...

    I'd be happy to help if you do go down the bodyshell route; I had started sorting mine for 00 too.

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  6. It’s interesting reading everyone’s comments about the inaccurate wheels, but so far sadly there are other issues too.  Having recently completed a Leader in N Gauge (video/image below; now on Shapeways) I heavily researched the engine including accessing her original plans.  Wheels and raised riveting (instead of flush) might be arguably minor, but potentially more noticeable is the absence of ten washout plugs on the roof.  Furthermore, the safety valves were in a single cut-out rather than two holes (as per the unique rooftop photo in K Robertson Bulleid Man Myth and Machine p86) and the sliding panels either side of the smokebox were actually different sizes.  Hopefully these will at least have the sliding doors fitted in the final model.  Several panel seams are also missing which seems unusual as others are present.  Then the funnel opening so far does not seem to fully correlate, and I hope the cycling lion on silver is not meant to be the works grey version! 

     

    As photos to date are of pre-production tests I’m sure there’s much already in the works (fireman’s window bars and cab interiors for example) but it will be interesting to see the final model – I have two on order.  I also messaged KR with these points a while back, though am still awaiting a response. 

     

    As an aside, the key published modeller’s drawings of Leader are themselves incorrect not only regarding some of the above but even having the fish belly sides in the wrong place! 

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_J9aUqRmkA

    LeaderNewmanMiniatures.jpg

    • Like 6
  7. Returning to something a little earlier, completed and awaiting running trials are two famously-tall engines: Agenoria (or is that Stourbridge Lion? ;) ) and LMR construction loco Twin Sisters.  Rather different machines!

     

    https://www.shapeways.com/product/3CT7LTVWP/n-gauge-lmr-twin-sisters-loco-scratch-aid

    https://www.shapeways.com/product/KRCG2WE2M/n-gauge-agenoria-stourbridge-lion-loco-scratch-aid

    IMG_1205#.jpg

    IMG_1219##.jpg

    • Like 6
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
  8. Finally complete, Bulleid’s Leader in N has been heavily upgraded to feature not only accurate super-detail (having even used the original prototype plans via the NRM) but also a redesigned chassis system with new scale BFB wheels in replacement of the under-scale rtr ones.  For those happy to compromise, however, a simple version with no chassis modifications is also available – videos have been produced explaining both of these construction methods.  Here though, the prototype shows her paces…

     

    If anyone is interested in a more detailed breakdown of how the model was designed and built, I would be happy to explain and show photos etc. 

     

    LeadVid#9.JPG

     

     

    • Like 5
    • Agree 1
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  9. 8 hours ago, Annie said:

    Thank you very much for responding to my enquiry.  I'm presently still weighing up questions of scale and gauge, but a Sentinel is still a part of my plans.  If I did go ahead with purchasing your Y10 model I think it would be better for me to source the intended mechanism rather than mess about with something found in one of my junk boxes.  I must comment though that I think your 19th century models are delightful and the N gauge ones are amazing little jewels.  To see them running in your Youtube video is an absolute delight.

     

    Very kind of you to say thanks.  The early days had such a distinct aesthetic and such variety what with their pioneering nature, it makes a bit of a difference from Big Four etc (along with saving space)!   As for the Sentinels, they're somewhat more modern but still just as distinctive and different in their own way so I certainly see their appeal.  Good luck with the layout plans.  

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. @Annie I think James has easily covered as much as I can in response to your questions, though to add with regard to the stronger/coarser plastic here are links covering more recent prints that hopefully you can gauge the finish from:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVw3LrNFIG8

    https://www.rmweb.co.uk/topic/176628-newman-miniatures-crampton

     

    As for motorising, it was designed for a specific motor-bogie chassis as James mentioned with no real intention for hollowing out per se, so I would recommend that type specifically.  If, however, you are set on a different chassis I am open to developing an alternate print for you that is as spacious as possible if wanted (you would need to design your own mounting point/s though).  At the very least I'm glad you find the model of interest!

    • Like 3
  11. On a current 3D development, Shapeways is increasing production costs of Smooth/Smoothest Fine Detail Plastic, and simultaneously promoting new materials - Gray and Clear Ultra Fine Detail Plastic.  Having now built a Head Wrightson in the new material, here are a few photos and thoughts:

     

    The new plastic is easily as crisp as ‘Smoothest’ (if not more so) and seems to respond well to filing and paint (with primer).  It’s just as brittle as its predecessor though, and while the buffers/details/wheel shims glued with no issue the accidentally-snapped-off brake remained somewhat weak post-gluing.  Knocked off a few times I ultimately experimented in turn with superglue and plastic glue, both working if delicate (although this could be unfair to fault seeing how small the part is), and later shored up with some UHU at the coaling stage.  Comparison of the finish with ‘Smoothest’ is stark, but again in fairness the predecessor was an early-built example before realising the need to thoroughly clean prints.  Sometimes ‘Smoothest’ can have a slight crystalising issue especially where not cleaned so it waits to be seen if this is duplicated on the new model.  Lastly, while not knowing if Shapeways has already increased its prices or not, the new material appears to be cheaper – in the case of 00 locos quite substantially. 

     

    Early days, but certainly worth considering. 

    #IMG_7029.jpg

    #IMG_7026.jpg

    #IMG_6931.jpg

    • Like 2
    • Informative/Useful 4
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  12. Recently upgrading the shape of Bulleid's 'Leader' in O Gauge, the decision to take this over to N etc as an improvement started a chain reaction of little tweaks that ultimately grew into discovering the model plans used were in areas completely wrong!  The result is a hyper-detailed model with as much as possible included and each element checked against multiple images and period plans to get as accurate a rendition as possible.  While the mechanics remain the same as an easy-build format the wheels are technically too small, so work has turned to hopefully develop a system for easy rewheeling of TomyTec chassis with BFB wheels.  There's a lot to prep and it might not be successful, but it's certainly worth trying...

    #LeaderUpgraderRender#5.jpg

    • Craftsmanship/clever 2
    • Friendly/supportive 1
×
×
  • Create New...