Jump to content
 

piranha230

Members
  • Posts

    396
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by piranha230

  1. Hornby got the shape right in 1987 when they first brought out the class 142, it makes you wonder what Dapol where thinking all these years on, they were told the 3d prints had issues with the size of the windows etc, it kind of reminds me of how they got the oo gauge class 150/2 so wrong when they brought that out in 1992, they could of got both these right first time round.

  2. Thanks for the replies. It is the earlier scheme I am looking for when it was Serco. Before 2016. If you are bringing it out in due course then I will be very interested.

    Thanks

    Precision decals do all the variations of the earlier Northern rail livery.

  3. I was told over 5 years ago that they were developing the low profile chassis to power dmu and emu units, that has come true, I was also told we would be seeing lots more dmu and emu units, we will see if this comes true.

  4. The annoying thing over the last 20 years has been duplication of models from different manufacturers for example lots of class 37,47 and deltics, also lots of different mk1 coaches to name a few examples, they all could of done various 1st generation dmu's and emu's and 2nd generation ones, and also the early ac electric loco's such as the class 81,82,83,84, also 3rd rail units, I think they are all finally realising now that they have run the course with duplicating diesel loco's and now they might finally be looking at doing some ac electrics, now that we have the Hornby retooled class 87, the Bachmann class 90 and the Heljan retooled class 86.

  5. Is it me or do the corners of the bodyside grilles look too square ?, if you look at the old Hornby class 86 and the new Hornby class 87 and also the real class 86 they look more rounded on the corners, the grilles on the original Heljan class 86 looked too big and also square on the corners.

×
×
  • Create New...