Jump to content
 

Robert Stokes

Members
  • Posts

    212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Robert Stokes

  1. That's a pretty good adaptation of 'Berrow' which I admired when I first saw it in a magazine. The only thing I don't like is the two platform roads in the main station being the same length. I think that the bottom one should be shorter, with the station building beside it, as in the original. I wonder whether you have drawn it like that because it is a part of what you have already built.

     

    Robert

    • Like 1
  2. Time for another update.

     

    I've now finished both main lines across the station boards. Here are pictures of the completed double tracks. You may notice that I have cleared some of the junk at the back of the layout but not all of it.

     

    gallery_1541_965_559340.jpg

     

    gallery_1541_965_557936.jpg

     

    The next picture is intended to show that I have slightly bent the points so that they follow the curve through the station but I'm not sure that it dies it very successfully.

     

    gallery_1541_965_566654.jpg

     

    Here are two videos of down line trains.

     

     

    The next stage is to make the new platforms. I can't lay the sidings until they are in place. I'll post another update when I've made significant progress.

     

    Robert

    • Like 7
  3. I had to send my Power Cab back to America two or three years ago when I damaged it. I had accidentally built a short into a loco and the Power Cab shut down completely. There was good communication with them and it came back in about a three weeks. It cost me about £40 for the repair and postage both ways. It was returned with a note saying "track circuit blown".

     

    Robert

  4. If they are fairly modern 00 locos (which don't need as much power as much older ones) then an NCE Power Cab will handle three at a time quite easily. In fact I have used mine to run four trains at once to amuse the grandchildren. I think that you will find a lot of people happy with this controller.

     

    Robert

  5. If it's taking advantage, then it's only taking advantage of the foolish.

     

    I once saw the bidding on a model railway item go over twice what you could get it for in several shops. Some people obviously have more money than sense.

     

    IMHO, it's only taking advantage when a child or vulnerable person is involved.

     

    Robert

    • Agree 5
  6. 1 hour ago, BWsTrains said:

     

    Maybe yours was a very old version which lacked that feature, how long had you had it? 

     

    I bought it second hand off Ebay several years ago. When bought it was the version that had only two addresses in recall (or something like that). After repair it came back with the (then) latest version of the software that had six addresses in recall (but that may not be the most modern version).

     

    Robert

  7. People may be interested to know what happened to my Power Cab a couple of years ago. I accidently built a short-circuit into a loco when I was fitting a sound decoder into it. (I had somehow got the wires from tender to engine mixed up.) I put it on the track and spent a couple of minutes unsuccessfully trying to get it to move. I then found that the screen of the Power Cab was blank and it refused to work. I sent it back to America for repair and it cost me nearly £40 for the repair and postage both ways. It was sent back with the comment "track circuit blown". It was not only repaired but the software upgraded. 

     

    I recently accidentally built a short-circuit into my layout when I got wires mixed up (I really must get out of this habit) but this time, although the Power Cab got warm, it didn't blow. On the other hand, this time I realised very quickly that something was wrong and switched off at the mains socket. I wonder whether, when it was repaired, they fitted in some sort of short-circuit protection.

     

    Robert

  8. I don't like your 1:80 idea if you keep to 16.5mm track gauge. Why propose a scale/gauge combination that's not correct?

     

    I'm another one who likes the 1:100 idea. I look at N gauge models and think that they are just too small but I have looked at 3mm scale models (which are very close to 1:100) and really liked them.

  9. You say that there is room for 14 trains but would they all be visible all of the time? What I would want is some hidden storage loops as in the first picture above.

     

    Robert

  10. DCC Concepts make point rodding kits which are intended to be fixed on top of the layout and look like the real thing. I have just bought the starter kit but haven't even opened the packet yet. I intend fitting it but it will be driven by my point motors. However, I believe it can be made to work with miniature levers, but this could be difficult. If you could do it successfully it would look great.

     

    Robert

     

    P.S. I used the bicycle spoke method on a previous layout and that is quite an easy way to do it. You need to file the end thinner for it to go through the hole in the point.

  11. I think that the diagram in the previous post shows a lifting flap across the doorway (and you would need some way to get inside your design). If it is very carefully made this will work, but there is an alternative which avoids the difficulties associated with it. This is to build the layout high enough (say about 5' to its lowest point) so that it is easy to duck under on your way in and out. The connection across the doorway could then be permanent (or at least semi-permanent with some way of opening a gap if necessary). Of course how high it needs to be depends on your height. I'm only 5' 7" so I find it easy to duck under 5'. I would certainly want to have the longest continuous run possible.

     

    Robert

  12. I have searched the forum rules and procedures but can't find an answer to the following question. Is it possible to change the title of a thread that I started? I started one just called "Layout in a shed" because I hadn't decided on a name for the layout. I have now done so and would like to give the thread that title.

     

    Robert

  13. Personally I wouldn't have a TT that small even if they did occur in reality. After all, the main purpose of a TT is to turn tender pulling engines and how many types are that short? Many modellers, especially young ones, go too far the other way and have a 70' one (possibly just because that's the size Hornby make) which only occurred at major termini. I think that one of about 40 to 45' would be much more useful.

     

    Robert

×
×
  • Create New...