pohlmannx

In each failing scenario stick A is a common factor. In each failing scenario B2 is a common factor. It can be concluded that A and B2 do not work together. However, I cannot conclude whether this is only due to A, or only due to B2 or both.

From Stick A - ver 9B2 does not work Stick B - ver 9B2 works you deduce that stick A must be faulty because B works with 9B2, but A does not. Sounds logical, no doubt. From Stick A - ver 9A4 works Stick A - ver 9B2 does not work one can deduce with exactly the same logic that 9B2 must be faulty because 9A4 works with A, but 9B2 does not. Both conclusions follow the same logic. So A is faulty or 9B2 is faulty or both. This was my point. I think this was a sensible and objective contribution to this topic.

Apparently one may only write something here that suits your plans. But then you don’t need to find it odd when people you scared don't want to answer anymore.

Only logic was important to me and not which side was right.

Excuse me please. But I could have guessed that based on your nickname. I have given my opinion, I will stick to it and I have nothing more to contribute.

And in Freiwald's HO it cannot be the stick as the stick works with another version. Same logic, isn't ist? I don't want to defend somebody here. I don't care who is right. But I am reluctant if someone thinks something is logical and something else not that follows the same logic just because the other does not suit his plans. That is my point.

Don't you notice that exactly the same goes for Shirleybasm? The only difference is that he agrees with something. Is that easier to accept for you because you agree with him? BTW: I've been following this part of the forum for several months now because I'm looking for a new program. I did not come across this randomly. And I don't suppose Shirleybasm either. I was actually hoping to find professional decision-making aids for my program selection in this forum. Unfortunately, I mainly find quite a bit of bashing here combined with the tendency to allow only one direction as an opinion. Too bad.

I registered here to express my opinion on this topic. Just like Shirleybasm, who also signed up on Thursday. Or was he allowed to do this because his opinion fit into your worldview?

I assume that he knows his software very well. If he is convinced that it is not due to the stick, then in my eyes it is quite weighty. If you don't trust his expertise, I would look for another program.

I don't find the logic strange. It may not be easy to understand. But in my eyes it's not sexismus, it's more a parable. He compares your point of view with something he says himself is nonsense to show how nonsensical it is in his eyes. As I said, maybe difficult to understand, but not illogical. He also says that it can't be because of the stick, but must be a difference in the software if 9a4 works for you with the stick, but 9b2 doesn't. That also sounds logical to me.