I realise this thread is a bit stale, but I came across it after a google search and have eventually come down to building the stay alive in one of Arts posts. I came this route after building the most simple circuit (diode, resister, 4700microF electrolytic capacitor) but finding it only gave about 1/4 wheel turn on a Hornby class 8 with a Hornby decoder (not TTS). So I acquired some of these super capacitors and built the version in this thread, I think with a total capacitance of about 0.2F. I installed it in place of the electrolytic circuit, but on test got less, indeed almost no discernible response. Having checked the wiring etc, I attached the decoder plus stay alive to an ESU decoder tester which has a small motor with flywheel on it. In this configuration, my super capacitor circuit kept the motor running for well over a minute, and I then found the electrolytic version kept the tester motor running for 10 seconds or so. So this seemed to be as expected, the super capacitors provide longer stay alive by a factor of order 6.
So the question I am hoping that someone here might be able to answer is is there any reason that the supercapacitor circuit shown here would have worse performance than the electrolytic version when installed and tested in the model train? Is there something about a proper load, the style of motor, the back emf, that would result in the super capacitors discharging faster than the electrolytic? With a voltmeter across the capacitors I can see the electrolytic keeps above 5v (the threshold I assume is needed for the dcc to stay alive) for a second or so, but the super app version drops immediately the power is cut.
Anyone seen this, and if so any clues as to what I have done wrong?