Jump to content
 

paftrain

Members
  • Posts

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by paftrain

  1. My BR green 20002 arrived safely yesterday. Trying to run it in I found that it derails on one of my ‘standard’ Peco points every time. I know people say this, but it’s the only loco I have that does this. It’s not even on the curve, so it’s not a tight radius issue. It is as it runs straight over the point from the vee direction, I have a feeling it’s because my layout isn’t perfectly flat and the bogies don’t seem to have much ‘float’ to compensate. In comparison to my recently acquired, superb running, Accurascale Class 37, it is very disappointing. I have checked the back to backs and they are ok.

    I wonder if anybody else has experience this problem and can offer a solution. If not it’s going back for a refund.

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. 2 hours ago, Brian said:

    So according to the ESU Loksound 3.5 manual  Top speed is set by CV 5 and is in the range 0 to 64, 64 being the fastest  Its set to 64 by default at new.

    What CV is used for the headcode box?  Is it the main head light? If so, then its dimmed via CV113 and setting the value between 0 and 15 with 15 being the brightest and 0 being dark/ Off

    Hi Brian,

    that’s great, thanks for your help! I’ve changed the CVs and it’s now sorted!

    • Like 1
  3. Hi all, I’ve searched high and low but can’t find where this may have been covered before. 
    i recently purchased, second hand, a Bachmann Class 42 Warship with sound that has an ESU v3.5 decoder. I want to 1) reduce the brightness of the headcode lights and 2) increase the top speed. I would appreciate if anyone can tell me which CVs to adjust and how. I’m ok with reading existing CVs and inputting new values but need to know if more than one CV is involved for each change.

    Many thanks in advance for any help.

  4. 1 minute ago, RedgateModels said:

     

    Sorry Paul, should have made it clear, it's an old Bachmann 8 pin deltic chassis fitted to a Dapol/kitmaster body essentially. The Accurathrash speaker is 4 ohms, so it's wired in series with the standard HM7000 sugar cube, giving 12 ohms.

    Thanks for your prompt reply. It will be interesting to find out how different the clearance in the top of the body from the Kitmaster version is to the Bachmann DP1 version. I also have the Kitmaster Deltic that I fitted to a Lima Chassis years ago. It still works well, but the loud Lima sound can’t match the proper Deltic sound!

  5. On 26/07/2023 at 20:28, RedgateModels said:

    Today I used an Accurathrash speaker to make my Hornby HM7000 fitted Deltic Prototype sound MUCH better 😁

     

    DSC_0339.JPG.c4786008a7403783367730a013b42216.JPG

    Is that a Bachmann Deltic? I’ve just fitted a Hornby HM 7000 decoder to my Bachmann Prototype Deltic and the sound is very limited by the tiny speaker. Is the accurathrash speaker 8 ohms ( I.e. correct for the Hornby decoder) and does the body shell still fit with the speaker in place?

     

  6. Dead loco sorted!

    Phoned Rails this morning and spoke to very helpful Lewis, he suggested to remove the smokebox door (easy as it happens though I was worried before) and check the decoder wasn’t loose. It was, I just pushed it in and hey presto, all ok now.

    Unfortunately in these days of internet shopping, very often things get dislodged in transit. Hopefully they are easily fixed as in this case.

    I’m a happy bunny again now!

    IMG_0631.jpeg

    • Like 1
    • Friendly/supportive 3
  7. My D1 with sound arrived this afternoon but unfortunately it is completely dead! It won’t work on DC or DCC, nor can I read an address for it. Rails are closed now, so I’ve left a message for a call back. They obviously don’t check these locos before they deliver them. For that kind of money, you would expect that. As they fit the decoders in the UK, why don’t they check they work?

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  8. 2 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

     

    You're asking for liveries not models. 

     

    They stated at the time it was released they can alter the different parts so that others can be made. They've just not released one of the first ten in BR 1950s condition, yet.

     

    All this was covered when they were first announced. They can do them all!

     

    They've only released a few models of the MN so far. Maybe wait until the next announcement as they might have one in the condition you want!

     

     

    Jason

    It isn’t just a livery change! I suggest you study the differences between the first batch and the rest of the class. The front end and valances are totally different. Also, the smoke deflectors are totally different to the SR versions they have produced.

    I hope you are right that they can ‘do them all’, but they haven’t done so yet although they’ve had six years since the first ones were announced.

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  9. 1 hour ago, BMacdermott said:

    Hello Paul

     

    We have to make an assumption that if a model is made, the maker will 'get what they can' from the tooling variations. Hence, it isn't listed.

     

    It doesn't always work, though.

     

    For example, Bachmann have never made S&D 7F 2-8-0 No.53807 - she had a unique smokebox saddle after rebuild. The late Merl Evans (of Bachmann) told me it would be too expensive to tool up for.

     

    As we say in the Q&A relating to 'variants': We have to leave it to the makers to ‘market research’ what they can actually make and realistically sell.

     

    Brian (on behalf of The 00 Poll Team)

    Hi Brian,

    fair enough! I guess I expected them to do the version I’m after, but it doesn’t look like it. I’ll just have to live with my Millholme model.

    B18BEF03-BF5B-4423-8AA4-2A6B6D8CABA7.png

    • Thanks 1
  10. 6 minutes ago, Steamport Southport said:

     

    They have though. They've done at least three in the first series, I've got two of them in SR livery. The model has provision for the different front ends, cabs and other differences in the design. This was all mentioned when it was first announced.

     

     

     

    Jason

    I said BR, not SR. They haven’t mentioned that version in any of their announcements.

  11. 1 hour ago, BMacdermott said:

    Hello paftrain

     

    The Rebuilt Merchant Navy was introduced by Hornby in 2000, but the 'original' air smooth casing type wasn't introduced until 2016.

     

    The former is within our cut-off date (2005); the latter, of course, isn't.

     

    Brian (on behalf of The 00 Poll Team)

    Hi Brian, 

    I’m well aware of that, but Hornby obviously haven’t tooled up the first series air smoothed BR version, so 2016 is irrelevant! Hopefully another manufacturer will introduce this version.

    Regards,

    Paul.

  12. 2 minutes ago, Going Spare said:

    It is based upon the Lima model but the chassis and drive unit were re-engineered by Hornby and the tyres are of the standard - albeit small - squarer cross-section rather than Lima's thin 'tap washers'.

    In which case, the traction tyres are probably the same as many other Hornby mechanisms, and should be pretty easy to get hold of.

  13. 8 minutes ago, Going Spare said:

    RAF96

    Often, yes - but the problem here is the Service Sheets (309 to 309F) for the Railroad 47 make no reference to tyres.

    If I remember correctly, the Hornby 47 is similar to the old Lima chassis, so some Lima traction tyres my well fit.

  14. On 10/04/2022 at 13:50, AyJay said:

    Thank you for that information.

    I have now gone through all my TTS locos and gone into the CV's to turn down the whistles and running sounds.

    All except my 6006 King George I. For some unknown reason, the decoder cannot be 'read'. Also I notice that this loco does not appear to be in the Hornby catalogue as being issued with a sound chip, so I suspect that this decoder is from someone else.

    I have a Hornby King George 1 and it is indeed factory fitted with a  TTS decoder. It doesn’t appear in the Hornby catalogue as it was made about five or six years ago as R3384TTS.

  15. Well I received my replacement Hush hush chassis today from Hornby, unfortunately it is as bad as the faulty one I returned to them a month ago. They said they had tested it. Perhaps they should have also said that it failed the test. I have written to them again and await their further instructions as to how I return it to them again. Did someone mention Hornby’s poor quality standards?

     

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  16. 6 hours ago, Dominion said:

    On Paftran’s running issue, you may want to check the cover over the worm gear is clicked down properly on both sides. It makes a definite click on each side. That cover is what’s holds the worm bearings down and if either end lifts it can disengage from the top gear. It can be deceiving as it seems secure with only one side clicked. This is the W1 set up.

    55B202DF-3BDD-477F-B014-BD72C482AABC.jpeg

    Hi Tom,

    thanks for the tips. I have checked all the points you have raised as I had exactly the same problem with another Hornby model, an original Merchant Navy, and also cured it with a sliver of plastic under the clip, but this doesn’t appear to be the same issue here.  
    I just hope Hornby will replace the chassis for me. If not, then it’s no more Hornby products for me, there have been just too many Quality problems.

    • Friendly/supportive 2
  17. 16 hours ago, MikeParkin65 said:

    Havent got one but I would check if the motor mount and/or gear train cover are loose?

    Hi Mike,

    I have now had the body off and confirm there are no loose mountings. I also took the opportunity to oil the bearings and gears, but it hasn’t made any difference. I have recently purchased two versions of the rebuilt W1s and they run quietly. I have therefore written to Hornby asking for a replacement chassis offering to return the chassis only as I don’t want to chance the body getting damaged in the post.

     

    • Friendly/supportive 1
×
×
  • Create New...