Jump to content
 

Nick Gough

Members
  • Posts

    2,162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nick Gough

  1. When the quadrupling took place, in the 1890s, this bridge wasn't widened - unlike the previous one.

     

    Here a separate, girder bridge was constructed, for the relief lines, with an open space between it and the original bridge. This open space corresponds with the position of the station's island platform - a short distance away.

     

    This is a view of the 'new' bridge from below the main lines:

    P1380825a.jpg.3928db547c9e3a7fb59fcf6ae2cf117f.jpg

     

    From the other end:

    P1380828a.jpg.b9b1e9b5519bdc4970051911895e161b.jpg

    (July 2023)

     

    Clearly there has been a problem with high vehicles!

     

    Back in 2003 it looked a lot less bright and the posted height restriction was different:

    Roadsidecloseup.jpg.9b9c6e12e1a42651262368bd51dee281.jpg

     

    The bridge seems to have lost a lot more height over the years. The 1911 track plan shews that the headroom was 12' 6" then!

     

    Back in the 1980s there was a lot less greenery as well:

    Oldvillageside.jpg.e584f8170c76bcb22a708748e8e3f4a5.jpg

    As well as the relief lines the 'new' bridge also carries the access road for what now is the station car park but was originally for the goods yard entrance:

    P1380738.JPG.142822c35c54c3638400cc8588d8e4c1.JPG

     

    Looking back towards the main lines it can be seen that the roadway is narrower under the old bridge compared with the 'new' one:

    West-eastunder.jpg.97d1de248aec883206f7595177e34056.jpg

    Interestingly, this narrow section of walling extends into the open air section.

     

    This leads me to believe that this section of walls may date back to the opening of the Wallingford branch, in the 1860s. At that time the branch had its own separate line, adjacent to the two main lines, from the bay platform at Moulsford station, to the point where it diverged towards Wallingford.

     

    I believe that these two walls originally served as abutments for a separate bridge for the branch line, later being removed when the main line was quadrupled, and the branch truncated at the new Cholsey station.

     

    Although heavily weathered it does appear that the lower brickwork, in the wall, is similar in colour to that for the main line bridge, on the left, while the (newer?) parapet has similar brick colour to the 'new', relief lines bridge:

    Nthmiddleabut.jpg.1b577bf03a382c7c72eef46366c46309.jpg

     

    If I am correct the branch line track would have needed removing before Cholsey's island platform could be constructed. Presumably, the relief lines bridge would have been constructed first, allowing the branch line to be temporarily diverted onto it; the parapets then built up after the branch and it's bridge had been removed.

     

    Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any photos or documentary evidence to confirm or deny my theories.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 6
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 6
  2. One wing wall in place - supported by a small shelf:

    P1400528.JPG.11ed7a685eeaa9e3e13df5e74b6055f3.JPG

     

    The other one, attached to one of the cross struts:

    P1400529.JPG.03bc972092a1a10252f68ea5e7991f23.JPG

    I had to 'nibble' away at the top of the cross strut as it was slightly too high.

     

    Both in place together with what will be the road surface:P1400531.JPG.b74b0d05c116f2fcf87561c9ab314030.JPG

     

    The road drops below natural ground level as it approaches the railway, in order to pass underneath:

    NWfieldwingwall.jpg.43e5de68b36029ae943b2bb2ad9afd0f.jpgSWwingwall.jpg.911215916d4413965519bf89923929d0.jpg

    Therefore, the lower parts of the wing walls will need to be 'buried' beneath ground cover.

    • Like 11
  3. This bridge will be located, on the layout, on the lifting flap in the doorway:

    P1400543.JPG.6a35edff7f6045d248650d503d4ba32c.JPG

     

    I made provision for it, when I built this board, by making holes in the longitudinal members beneath the trackbed:

    P1400545.JPG.7a0d4597df39a3e5b1e9d17ae87b8b7e.JPG

     

    And creating a channel with plywood sides:

    P1400541.JPG.5cbd687f9650fe547ecb3d7924114144.JPG

     

    Due to the location it will be much easier to work on from both sides and underneath. When it's finished it will also be easier to view the bridge from both sides.

    • Like 9
  4. What can I do with a piece of plastic drainpipe?

    P1400539.JPG.5c073325ba097f39329700a6afaf2661.JPG

     

    Well, as I did for the last bridge, I can cut it in half and use it for the arch of the next bridge:

    P1400363.JPG.7127977d7c60d317d9b4563914a395a7.JPG

     

    This one though is a skew bridge:P1400365.JPG.8083aa978046e19b6c626e72dc8df0a1.JPG

     

    Another Brunel brick road bridge, this time for the public road leading into Cholsey from the south:

    StnRdBr4.jpg.f27129b315245fdbba497f6ae9ef3942.jpg

    Again, the bridge has been rebuilt, in recent times, with a girder deck, but would have looked like a lower version of this one, a mile or so further west:

    P1380960a.jpg.1fbab27be54e209ec2f12539bb813a54.jpg

     

     

    • Like 11
  5. 8 hours ago, MrWolf said:

     

    Not fun at all, add to that landmarks being virtually invisible or appearing to float depending on the position of the sun, making judging distance a PITA.

     

    I saw an odd sight, last month, on a bright sunny day, sailing amongst islands off the Dalmation coast.

    From a distance I thought it was an aircraft carrier or submarine, but using my zoom lens it turned out to be this:

    P1400027.JPG.6e62497eeac7c067a78a8592e0858db9.JPG

    • Like 4
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
×
×
  • Create New...