Flying Pig

4 hours ago, dave75 said:

I like it , it has the feel of a dockside branch, loose the turntable and have two sidings in its space for loco storage/inspection/coaling.

 

Model the fiddle yard as the inner end of a set of exchange sidings and you have the full branch, with the added bonus of shunting at both ends.

8 minutes ago, rodent279 said:

I think @rockershovel is right-Britain just wasn't big enough to justify changing the relationship between all those interdependent systems.

As others have pointed out, it's more nuanced than that. Block trains of high capacity wagons hauled by 3000+hp locos have become the norm in recent decades and Britain hasn't grown in the meantime.  What has changed utterly is the traffic and the operations and infrastructure that support it.

1 minute ago, TomScrut said:

 

Thanks, but it has spent more than half it's life in preservation so I don't want to presume that it is identical today to what it was when it was named over 50 years ago! That's why I am asking.

 

The Rails listing for it does show it as Era 11 so it should be as per today, however.

Ah, sorry. If you look at the main Black Five thread there are recent photos which show it in this livery with polished smokebox hinges and motion, so I guess the answer is still yes - the model depicts the current condition.

1 minute ago, TomScrut said:

This looks to me as though it's in present day condition. Is this the case does anyone know?

The loco was named in preservation, so yes.

1 hour ago, daltonparva said:

The colour of the valve gear/rods on the new Eric Treacy looks a bit jarring.  Something else to have a go at.

Seems to be correct according to @zr2498's photos above as this is of course a model of the loco in preserved condition.  Rods and smokebox door will probably look like 5200 on the actual model.

The 'For Sale' video popped up on my Youtube feed this morning for some reason. I hadn't been paying attention to this thread and it's always a bit of an 'oh no' moment when a layout you like is put up for sale.  Glad to hear it had a good outcome.

8 hours ago, maico said:

The traditionalist, or Luddites depending on your point of view, must be horrified at this loco which has water based smoke system, sound and LED lamps...!

Compared to the Hornby system (below) that steam generator seems quite a bit more convincing.  For a start, the exhaust emerges at a higher speed which results in a realistic transition from a laminar column to a turbulent cloud just above the chimney top (all to do with Reynolds numbers I think).  Also the cloud stays aloft longer whereas the Hornby one looks like a portable rain shower - finer droplets from the TRS unit?

36 minutes ago, Barclay said:

Somewhere on the Pugbash thread is an outside cylinder 0-6-0 version, and it looks superb.

Quite a number of people have used the Electrotren chassis which as you day can look very good indeed.

On 20/04/2024 at 23:07, Steamport Southport said:

Not quite, it was for the very short lived Ticket Operated train set.

 

http://www.hornbyguide.com/item_details.asp?itemid=446

I'd completely forgotten about this item.  The working signal impressed me at the time: I guess it was a very simple mechanical linkage, but it still looks like fun.

37 minutes ago, Hroth said:

Flying Scotsman is "iconic" because it suits the NRM for it to be so.

 

It should also be remembered that until the Moneypit fell into their hands, City of Truro was the NRMs candidate for "the first to 100" .  All the official stuff for FS is their spin.

 

I get rather tired of the Waah! that Flying Scotsman attracts.  It's the only A3 that made it into preservation and without it we'd have none of Gresley's original Pacifics (insert arguments about it's not an A1 here).

13 hours ago, franciswilliamwebb said:

 

That week by week builds into a pile of shhhhhhhteam memorabilia🙄

Fortunately this one was sold out or I might have been tempted.

You might be interested in this old thread:

18 hours ago, Ron Ron Ron said:

Some of you might remember stories about Concorde supersonic booms being heard in the West Country (Devon and Somerset) and the Channel Islands.

The supersonic shock wave would travel ahead of the aircraft and if the atmospheric conditions were right (or wrong, depending how you look at it), Concorde’s boom would continue forward towards landfall in the Bristol Channel (for London), or the Channel Islands and northern Brittany (for Paris ), even after the aircraft had decelerated through subsonic transition long before crossing the coast.

 

I've read claims by Hunter pilots that they used that effect to fake supersonic overflight of US bases.  The Hunter would go supersonic in a dive, but was firmly subsonic in level flight.

13 minutes ago, The Stationmaster said:

But Hornby don't just need to come up with a better mousetrap but also the right sort of mousetrap at the right price.  Locomotion No.1 might wot rk very well for them but will they sell enough of them to keep the price down and thus sell even more?  The right version of Black Five could be quite attractive for me but I would hope to see a more attractive price ticket.   k Make the right thing and get teh marketing right so that you k make more and reduce the unit price.  That is where SK misses the track in that RM comment piece - overheads are one thing but getting the marketing right is a very different thing and far more important.

I'm not sure Hornby understand it either.  This (below) looks ominously like they're looking at new rabbit holes to dart down.  They really should have learned that lesson by now.  From the reactions it has attracted, the Black Five is clearly a mess - if they'd just designed it like the Princess Royal it would have been fine and probably cheaper to develop and produce.  I don't know why they feel they need to chase novelty.

Quote

we expect to start improving our revenue and margins positively this financial year through the identification of new customers, opening up of new territories and launch of new product ranges.

13 hours ago, ColinB said:

It may be they wanted the extra weight. One of the reviewers I watched was showing how to fit the DCC decoder, it was hard to see but it looked like the tender weight was gone and it was mainly plastic. As I say it wasn't easy to see, but that could be a reason.

Yes possibly, but designing a tender isn't rocket science and Hornby generally do it very well.  It's not as if the Stanier type is particularly small either.

10 hours ago, Ron Ron Ron said:

London outbounds passed over the Bristol area before crossing the coast near Weston-super-Mare, prior to reaching the acceleration point out over the Bristol Channel, heading towards the Oceanic track entry.

They used to pass just south of me in North Wilts and if conditions were right I could follow them westbound all the way to the turn onto a southwesterly heading down the Bristol Channel. It was particularly dramatic just after a late autumn sunset if a Concorde was leaving a sunlit contrail.

10 minutes ago, 62613 said:

At least they weren't Paxmans😬

If you follow the Rock Family Trees histories of Napier and Paxman, by the mid 70s they almost were. It was all Poached Paxman Diesels in a White Wine Sauce at that point, before the inevitable split.

3 hours ago, zr2498 said:

But he brought to light a number of points with this new Black 5 to consider:

I'm not crazy about the tender underframe - diecasting certainly seems to be a rabbit hole in this case and I don't think the result is as good as on earlier all-plastic models, certainly not as crisp, which I think will show up in normal use.  There also seems to be less daylight than there should be through the frame cutouts. They had a good Stanier 4000 gallon tender underframe with the Princess and all they needed were some 9 ton bodies to go on top.

12 minutes ago, Jol Wilkinson said:

The difficulty with requiring people to attend courses is whether they will actually take any notice of the course material.

Or indeed whether they are able to gain anything from the course.  In this case I suspect it will be like sending a dachshund to a 100m hurdles workshop.

21 hours ago, johnofwessex said:

A candidate for a Hospital Order surely

 

Two years, suspended, and a two year disqualification, amongst other stocking fillers, apparently.  I like the requirement to complete an "accredited thinking skills programme" within 20 days.

https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2024/april/15-04-2024/man-sentenced-for-dangerous-driving-and-child-neglect--m40/

37 minutes ago, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

And back to model railways, this is just one of the objections to sound effects at exhibitions.  The sound doesn't stop neatly within a foot or two of the layout edge...

But it should.  In the future we will have holographic soundscapes from arrays of speakers attached to the layout that yield all the correct sounds for the listener's position and stop neatly just beyond viewing distance.  At last it will be possible to correctly simulate the doppler effect of a Deltic passing at speed and the etched hens on Wansbeck Road will be able to cluck.

Even better the same technology will be mandatory for all domestic and automotive sound systems, so we won't have to share the listening choices of people who think WOB WOB repeated endlessly at maximum volume over frantic shouting is music.

1 hour ago, Ravenser said:

It would be quite interesting to see how big a mildly compressed version designed to take an A3/A4 plus 8 Mk1s  would be in TT:120

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17.4&lat=53.79543&lon=-1.55675&layers=168&b=1&o=100

https://www.s-r-s.org.uk/html/LNERDiagrams.htm  (look for Leeds 'A')

From the concourse to the scissors crossing 340m (~2.8m at1:120); to the River Aire 460m (~3.8m).  Still quite a lot of compression needed, I think.  Some of the pointwork will need to be built or redesigned to use proprietary items. Probably better to design an "inspired by" layout with some of the features of Leeds Central.

34 minutes ago, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

Thus it will look very LMR among Doncaster's finest green liveried beauties, as cared for by Peter Townend.

Largely due to the availability of cleaners.  I don't believe the tales of Polish refugees at Top Shed.  I think he had a secret gang of Oompa Loompas that the Home Office didn't know about.

I visited the Calne show today and was much struck by how good recent rtr looks when running on a decently built layout, even in out-of-the-box condition.  Many of the things that offend the eye in the huge close-ups we see online just aren't a factor at the fabled normal viewing distance. 

I unexpectedly saw one of these in the flesh at the Calne show and the trader briefly ran it up and down for me.  The lamps did not look excessively large, although the lenses on the front ones are bigger than they should be; there's a white lamp at the rear of the tender and that seems to have a smaller lens.  When running on DC the lamps light up warm yellow, which isn't very convincing and is much too bright; the tender lamp lights in reverse.

The unoccupied lamp irons looked quite fine and I couldn't see any sign of light bleed if that is an issue people are worried about (the trader told me the lamps are LEDs, but I thought Hornby were using a light pipe system).   They seemed to be fine enough that you wouldn't want to be changing them frequently.

I could see a single ejector pin mark near the top corner of the frame extension, but it is less obvious than on the sample and I had to peer to see it.

The paint on the smokebox door hinge pin has been tidied up considerably since the sample.

9 hours ago, Schooner said:

Changes from left to right

Nope, sorry.  Keep it simple - ditch the loco shed and the kickback.  The former adds no play value as it would only be occupied overnight and might well be out of use by the OP's period.

The kickback,siding doesn't really fit the board and serves to highlight the board edge.  As an aside, I like the crossed sidings pattern, but the diamond crossing is tricky to wire for live frog as if the points are set for both sidings, the frog polarities are undetermined (so ok with insulfrog or if you can implement some kind of point interlocking).

There should be plenty of shunting fun with two railway sidings and one private siding.