Jump to content
 

James Makin

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    1,507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by James Makin

  1. Thanks ever so much for the guidance and insight above on the videos guys, much appreciated!

     

    I will have to have a look sometime to see if I've got a way of making a video and seeing how it goes, though I am a little more old fashioned being a words and pictures person, they seem to flow out naturally and are easy to write! I'm always inspired by the old Model Rail & Rail Express magazine step-by-step 'how to do it' articles I grew up with reading in the late 90s and then writing in that style, though nowadays videos have come along changing the game somewhat!

     

    I must admit that I don't really get time to watch any modelling videos online currently, so that puts me at a slight disadvantage there on best practice but I am sure I can learn along the way in due course for when the time comes!

     

    Cheers,

    James

     

     

  2. On 11/08/2022 at 15:23, aeroplane said:

    Have you ever thought about making a video showing your weathering techniques?


    That would be a fun idea sometime! Right now I feel a bit of a beginner in that area, it all looks a bit daunting presenting the stuff for filming and then working out how people do the post production editing to make it watchable, seems like witchcraft! 
     

    I guess practice makes perfect, my fear is just running off a load of cheesy Alan Partridge-esque videos 😂
     

    Cheers,

    James

    • Like 3
    • Funny 2
  3. 16 hours ago, rob D2 said:

    Nice one James !

    I remember your article on detailing 60028 which appeared in “ modern railway modelling “ ( I think it was called ), what a shame that didn’t continue as the pure DE content was great .


    Cheers Rob!

     

    Haha, that feels a lifetime ago now! I miss the MRM mag, it was a decent concept!
     

    I remember contributing articles for a few issues in a row and mates down the club started teasing that MRM meant Makin Railway Modelling 🤦‍♂️😂 

    It’d be fun if something similar came back, with 15yrs or so passed since it seems more people than ever are tackling D&E stuff!

     

    Cheers,

    James

    • Like 3
    • Agree 4
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  4. Just adding to this thread for a bit of fun, it was nice tackling this Intercity example recently - Virgin West Coast's 90010 275 Railway Squadron (Volunteers), modelled in circa 2000 condition. 

     

    52227925831_dffcbe43ae_k.jpg90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    52227926191_f4569eae79_k.jpg90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    52227939188_2b58152e20_k.jpg90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    52228409210_525c3985df_k.jpg87029 87031 90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    52226921542_7b70c1c20a_k.jpg87029 90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    52228198354_b0ed95c84d_k.jpg90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    52228198684_e7f713b331_k.jpg90010 by James Makin by James Makin - Account 3, on Flickr

     

    A bit more blurb about it appears below here on my Workbench page, the hardest part was putting the loco back together again and working out which screws went back in which holes 🤣

     

    Great fun model to work on!

     

    Cheers,

    James

    • Like 18
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  5. Hi Rich!

     

    Great to catch up yesterday, our talk about the Eclipse trains prompted me to dig out my RAIL magazines, this was the feature I recalled reading from RAIL 364, including details of all the workings and some juicy Class 66 passenger train action..! 
     

    B63ADAFF-FA63-44EA-A046-CB035C1A0064.jpeg.0808e421a38d36092c3e99c185017b2d.jpeg


    48BB5900-B534-46D7-9BEF-FD6C2DD758A3.jpeg.eea1a6c72447748f1cef4672e9f91755.jpeg

    This one won’t rotate out of sideways but hopefully of use..!

     

    FA1A99B4-2676-4ED8-AAA8-7DE744511083.jpeg.ec87d7bdf165cf19d5e39a07fe66abdb.jpeg


    Of the 66s that assisted, 66124 and 66125 were very new at the time, being from the boatload before last at the time (the newest batch in country then being 66128-138). They are listed in RAIL 363 as being the first 66s to visit Penzance interestingly - 66125 on a rake of fuel tanks on Jul 6th and 66124 on Jul 13th.

     

    66106 was recorded on an Evian bottled water train between St Blazey-Truro on Jul 29th too.

     

    Enjoy!

    James

    • Like 3
  6.  

    On 16/07/2022 at 20:47, The Black Prince said:

    Cancelled my FGW HST pre-order, 2022 and they can't even do tampo printing that they some how managed (quite well it seems!)  20 years ago ? Obviously a cost decision, Accurascale have managed it with the TPE livery which is arguably more difficult than FGW !

     

    Going off recent Hornby QC it's going to be a lottery if you can get a full set in a decent condition anyway.

     

    Lets hope the rumours about AS doing HSTs and MK3s comes true!! 

     

    This is perfectly illustrated by the Rails of Sheffield Ltd Edition Bachmann Class 47 just announced in the complex ROG livery, complete with multiple fade outs, colour changes and tiny pinstripes...Hornby saying FGW 'Fag Packet' can't be done as tampo printing...time to up their game and invest in some new technology to keep pace with competitors..!

     

     

     

    • Like 6
    • Agree 1
  7. Thanks for all the nice comments guys!

     

    On 09/07/2022 at 13:50, D6775 said:

    Fantastic work on the 87's as always. Fancy having a go at something 7mm??

     

    Haha, that is an interesting thought! I always get too ambitious so I think I'd need a giant barn for the layouts I'd want to create or the income of Pete Waterman to keep up..! 🤣

     

    Mind you with Heljan's models sometimes being discounted I have lusted after the concept of having a model of my favourite Class 60 just sitting on the mantlepiece as a display! A giant 60038 Bidean Nam Bian all bulled up in Trainload Metals would be rather fun! 😎

     

     

    On 11/07/2022 at 10:34, aeroplane said:

    Hi James. Saw your 92 in the Accurascale topic and then bought the new Simon Bendall bookazine and have been reading through many of your old posts. You will have inspired so many people to try weathering and brought back many happy memories of locos in the past. Thanks and look forward to seeing more of your work :)

     

    Thank you so much! I always hope I can inspire others to pick up the paintbrushes and have a go at a bit of bodging! When I was very new at the hobby it always seemed so intimidating so I hope my pics show that anyone can pick up the paints, cotton buds and bits and just get started somewhere, and then just keep practicing and practicing! 

     

    It's also been a lot of fun bringing the old locos back from the past, when I first started modelling these were 'modern image' and the stuff you saw in the Lima catalogue...where did the time go?! I think the late '90s are a bit like the new steam/diesel transition era with the last remnants of old BR giving way to the new order, bringing so much variety and interesting juxtapositions of stock next to each other!

     

    On 12/07/2022 at 05:59, sb67 said:

    Well done on getting your work in the Modelling 90's loco's bookazine, I always knew your stuff was worth seeing in print. Just waiting for the book to come out now 😉

    As said above you've inspired many people, myself included, to have a go at weathering and detailing. Your style and photo's make it easy to understand and follow. I'm looking forward to the next project 👍

     

     

    Thanks Steve! It is always odd seeing stuff in print, especially things like the work-in-progress shots, and you look in the magazine and it's like "hey that's my workbench there!" 😂 My first ever article was for Model Rail in 2004 (the infamous Ginsters 158!) but you do still get a bit of a mini buzz each time a new issue drops, and the silly idea of buying two copies, one for reading and 'one to keep nice' !!

     

    Cheers,

    James

     

    • Like 4
  8. 19 hours ago, TRAILRAGE said:

    That looks Stunning.  James Makin's an absolute Artist and has made something this good look even better! That weathering is sublime.

     

    Cheers Accurascale for producing such an amazing model and James for doing it Justice!


    Haha you are too kind! 
     

    I’ve tackled a lot of weathering jobs over the years but I must admit this one was a little daunting at the start of the project thinking that there aren’t many Accurascale 92s in the country so there was no Plan B if it all went pear-shaped 🤣
     

    I must say hats off to the Accurascale gang, the model is incredible, there are even tiny etched brass grilles in some most obscure places across the roof and believe it or not, even the underframe, everything is just so crisp and beautifully modelled. 
     

    I might be biased but I’d say that the 92 is even better than the awesome Deltic! 
     

    Cheers,

    James

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 3
    • Informative/Useful 2
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  9. Looking good Rich!

     

    I don’t envy you with the Intercity respray there, to do that on a 37 is as tricky a paint job as it gets! 
     

    I chickened out and used a pre-painted Bachmann Intercity 37685 body for my 37510, figuring out it was easier for my bodging hands to change the ends, grille arrangements and do the roof mods on that body rather than try repainting a split-ender and somehow get the stripes all painted with precision! 🤣

     

    Love the new 3D print nose grilles, they’ve come up really nicely! 
     

    Cheers

    James

  10. 1 hour ago, sb67 said:

    Thanks James, the Humbrol can I used dried almost white! I think I should get varnish from a Model shop with a high turnover,  probably online. I wonder if the can I got has been on the shelf a few years! 


    Definitely this Steve!

    I order from the source where possible to hope for the freshest batch! Humbrol aerosols from the Hornby website and Railmatch’s ‘home’ supplier is Howes of Oxford.

     

    Cheers,

    James

  11. On 05/07/2022 at 06:19, sb67 said:

    More fantastic work James, I love the electrics and the patchy finish of 47 467 👍

    I'm sure you've mentioned it before but which Matt varnish do you use? I've had problems with a Humbrol rattle can recently. 

    Thanks for the heads up on the bookazine, I'm sure a copy will find it's way to my letterbox soon!

     

    On 05/07/2022 at 12:01, dj_crisp said:

    Always nice to see a battered duff. This one is a stunner.

     

    I'm also interested in matt varnishes - I've kinda given up on them and nowadays use railmatch satin which is the only varnish I've had success with.

     

    Thanks ever so much guys!

     

    I have been through a lot of trauma with various varnishes over the years 😄 For starters I always use aerosols as I just can't be bothered to load up an airbrush for a varnish coat!

     

    My current favourite in recent times is Railmatch, their gloss and matt varnish aerosols have been pretty good in recent times, so are my go-to at the moment.

     

    I used to use these in the distant past but had issues with aerosol cans blocking prematurely, and matt varnish that dried satin, so steered away from Railmatch, but in the last two-three years they have always been good. I always make a point of buying a fresh batch directly from Howes to be sure you're not lumbered with older stock from a model shop, and I'll always write the date of purchase, source & first use date on each aerosol can to help use the oldest first and help keep track in case any faulty ones need returning!

     

    I've also had some success with Humbrol's matt and gloss varnish but recent batches in the last couple of years have been very watery - it's easy to flood a model with just one pass of the aerosol! I still have some stock of these but they have been 'downgraded' to be used on wagon projects only rather than any locos! I did have a very cloudy Humbrol varnish that almost ruined my BR green 47004 from many years ago, fortunately I managed to wipe off the varnish while wet and re-coat with Railmatch subsequently. 

     

    Finally there are the 'others'! I often read about other people's varnish brands and give them a try. Testors varnish for me is highly volatile, it would crinkle up Railtec decals and cause crazing on certain paint surfaces (like Phoenix paints or certain Humbrols) randomly (remember those BP TEAs I mentioned that got mucked up!), and then I've experimented with some of the brands more popular in military modelling but the matt varnishes here can generally give a bit of a speckled finish or only semi-matt, or the dreaded orange peel, without warning! 

     

    So all in all, Railmatch gets my current vote, as long as you get fresh versions every few months and praying that the makers HMG don't mess with the recipe!

     

    Cheers,

    James

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 7
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  12. 6 minutes ago, thetrains said:

    Well may be I have I've done my sums wrong, based on R1 being 371mm, add 67mm gives R2 at 438, and each larger radius being 67mm more than last and I keep going to my 2000mm it's probably about R15+ pretty gentle.  Anyway still working on what's causing this snagging to kinematic. Will get there.

     

    Have you thought about fitting a wire 'goalpost' coupling instead potentially? I use these as it lets you fit the full pipework at both ends of the loco, and it can still work with your coaches on curves using their original tension lock couplings. I've yet to fit my D9016 with a goalpost but will be doing so, on all my locos I use 0.45mm handrail wire bent into a 'U' shape, drilled in to the bufferbeam and secured with superglue/contact adhesive.

     

    I had trouble with Hornby Class 60s and their kinematic couplers centering, a wire goalpost solves two problems in one by going for a DIY coupler for improved running and getting the pipe details fitted, it mainly works well for locos where you're pulling things rather than pushing, just to caveat though.

     

    Quick pic on a spare 47, but my 'Deltic' will get the same treatment soon -

     

    1581439008_Goalpostcoupling.PNG.e77062150135851c75ae2f2865ae8361.PNG

     

    Cheers,

    James

    • Like 6
    • Agree 1
    • Informative/Useful 3
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  13. 2 hours ago, Hilux5972 said:

    That’s a shame. Does anyone have the older Fag Packet stock? Was that transfers as well? Be interesting to know. 


    I’ve got all of the releases of previous Fag Packet stock, from the Hornby Mk2s, Mk3 TGS, Lima Mk3s, Sleepers and HST, all tampo printed. I must say I thought the previous tampo efforts all tackled before were more than good enough for my eyes so was surprised to see that current-day Hornby feel unable to come close/exceed this in 2022!

     

    My main concern upfront is the firstly whether the factory can consistently apply the decals as level as a printing machine can, and then secondly the long term durability, whether as users we’ll need to add a top coat of varnish to protect the decals to stop them getting easily scratched or lifting round the edges (and that’s assuming they have been fully applied over the contours of things like the doors and panel gaps, eek!).

     

    Finally it will likely make renumbering challenging as we will have to patch paint over the gold band for a decal as there won’t be any printing to remove as such! 
     

    I’m hoping that the end products will be amazing and all this is forgotten but it does bring up many concerns over using waterslide decals that you’d think should’ve been left behind 30+ years ago! 
     

    Cheers,

    James

  14. Hi guys,

     

    Bad news on the FGW Fag Packet HST, Hornby have confirmed to me that the stripes are indeed waterslide decals...!

     

    3C35D917-7301-4917-A242-5A52D89E0C47.png.a0f75cf6df474047beb3ba5b50490d35.png


    I’ll wait and see what the quality is like in the flesh, I’ve ordered a small fleet of HSTs given we’ve been waiting 23 years for this livery so it’ll either be a very expensive Winter or a very cheap one!


    The superb Railtec decals are still available so it will literally be a case of whether Hornby’s finish beats the ones I painted some years back, at least here the Mk3s will hopefully be a better standard than the originals.

     

    Impressed that Hornby came back to my email in an afternoon though, full marks there, I did not expect them to engage so quickly on technical details with customers directly!

     

    Cheers,

    James

     

    • Like 4
    • Informative/Useful 2
  15. For the benefit of RMWebbers, would there be any way that Warners may be able to press Hornby to give a brief update as to whether the production FGW 'Fag Packet' products use waterslide decals as alleged from the photos? 

     

    It'd be great for us all to find out one way or another and similar to other product queries that have arisen over the years with the other manufacturers, if Hornby are able to give a definitive answer it could help boost pre-orders further - the allegations of transfer being used are surely pretty damaging if this isn't the case.

     

    Like many others here I've placed a significant pre-order for these products already on the good faith of them being tampo-printed in line with 99.9% of all other previous Hornby releases, so to confirm the specification can only be a good thing and would mean that we can place further pre-orders with confidence.

     

    At the moment it appears that, as buyers, we're shepherded towards committing to upfront pre-orders (and direct from Hornby.com, at that) to guarantee delivery, but it sounds as if the specification may be different to that advertised. Hopefully this won't be the case and Hornby can put the rumour to bed?

     

    Many thanks in advance!

    James

     

     

    • Agree 2
  16. 19 hours ago, njee20 said:

    Thanks James, that’s awesome! I’m still traumatised from varnishing a set of printed wagons; only to watch it eat the decals in front of my eyes, whilst helpfully varnishing the resulting mush!

     

    Ouch, that sounds painful to watch! I've had similar before when using certain varnishes that are just naughty! My current go-to varnish is Railmatch, their aerosol cans make it nice and easy to apply and the result is generally very smooth and nice. I have had mixed success with Humbrol aerosol varnish too, sometimes it is amazing in every way, the current formulation in recent couple of years seems very 'wet' and it's easy to flood a model with just 1 pass of the spray if not careful, but dries generally very well.

     

    Where I've had the real pain is in some of the US brands of varnish, things like Testors, I'd heard great stuff about Dullcote but when trying it, it reacted with some Phoenix paints and certain Humbrol shades, but others it's fine, again the same with a few of the other varnishes that I've tried, and can also be volatile with Railtec decals too, so it's a gamble!

     

    Yet to debut on these pages are a couple of weathered Bachmann BP green TEA bogie tankers that I sprayed in March 2019, I'd given them a coat of Testors varnish over a paint-on/wipe-off effect and had such a reaction that the varnish had given the tankers a complete crackle glaze finish, if you imagine looking at something like the dried salt flats in Utah 🤦‍♂️🤣 I keep meaning to get around to giving them a strip down and re-doing sometime, just goes to show that the varnishes can easily catch you out!

     

    Cheers,

    James

    • Like 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  17. 17 hours ago, njee20 said:

    Lovely job as ever!

     

    When you're doing your 'paint on wipe off' (said like Mr Miyagi) how much do you thin the paint? Or is it 'neat'? I keep thinking I'll give your methods a go!

     

    Haha thanks Nick, for the paint on wipe off stage I tend to vary the thinness of the paint depending on the end effect. In many cases I'll go for neat Humbrol enamel paint, and the benefit is that it can be useful to heavily tint the underlying paint if desired, or give a good solid build up of colour in the recesses once any extra paint has been wiped away and wiped down further with enamel thinners on a cotton bud.

     

    In other cases I'll go for a much more diluted wash, this is useful where I'm looking for a streaky finish, things like the sides of the diesel locos have a wash of almost 80% Humbrol thinners to 20% paint so it's super light and gives a very gradual build up of colour. I'll sometimes also vary how I apply it, sometimes I will pre-mix a wash and other times I'll almost mix it on the side of the model, adding a paintbrush laced with thinners (or paint) if I decide the consistency isn't right whilst actually on the model!

     

    It's very much a case of just dabbling and seeing what works well, it doesn't always work well straight away and needs a lot of playing around, so I can't give more precise tips than that! I've been using this method for almost 20 years and am still learning on the shades to use, I just use enamels only and have been familiarising myself with how the different Humbrol shades work, as some definitely thin down better than others! I sometimes use Phoenix Paints also, but they dry extremely quickly so any washes of that need a lot more proportion of thinners to keep it wet before wiping off the excess colour.

     

    One thing to watch for where I've tripped myself up in the past is that the washes with high concentrations of enamel thinners will start to strip through layers of dried varnish if left long enough, so nowadays I always leave a model for at least 1 month to fully harden to almost bullet-proof status before 'attacking' as there is nothing worse than wiping off your livery as well as your weathering 🤣 

     

    The same goes for any RTR liveries as well, always do a pre-weathering coat of varnish to protect the surface, and then after all the weathering this is followed by a final coating, prior to the final airbrush weathering stage. It flattens the surfaces out slightly and removes some of the accidental sheen you get when doing the paint-on/wipe-off too.

     

    Hope this helps!

    James 

    • Informative/Useful 8
×
×
  • Create New...