Jump to content
 

dibateg

Members
  • Posts

    1,355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dibateg

  1. After another successful running session, my thoughts have turned back to the concrete signals - as work is well on with the electronic controls for them. There are two single posts and one bracket to make.
    This is my first shot at milling out the bell shaped slots in the signal post. The protoypes do vary in the shape of the slots. All I have to do now, is taper the whole post...

    IMG_8857.JPG.b11a9f96968a2f9a5989604c8f76dfac.JPG

     

    So with some heavy filing and then finishing up with the milling machine has got me this far.

    IMG_8859.JPG.cd598447803add9460540d53c1c823e9.JPG

     

    • Like 4
    • Craftsmanship/clever 8
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. Has anyone ever had one of these apart to repair? It looks like the output transistors have blown, but there are no identifying numbers on them. I've not been able to find a circuit diagram or anty tech details online either.... At least if I knew the transistor types, I could replace them.

    IMG_8851.jpg.bc633866d40b644bab2b149d4730dec7.jpg

     

    Tony

     

     

     

  3. Thanks Carl - 

    Work continues - adding York Modelmaking GNR signs and lamps to Peter Leyland's excellent station building. Posters have also been added now. A J50 fies by....

    IMG_8738.JPG.e0b025d6c4f75752935ff905405b12e0.JPG

     

    I'm also starting to plant the signals. Thats an odd looking moon up there!

    IMG_8740.JPG.a5e69ee8ef658922d8f74fa81e48e7ca.JPG

     



    and connect up the servos and Merg controllers underneath... still more wiring to add...

    IMG_8741.JPG.d5593fd0f53e4d55850fb62a24e8154a.JPG

    • Like 13
  4. I can't quite make 50 years seperation in models of the same class, but I can do about 30! 90674 was built as a one off in the '90s, long before I moved from 4mm to 7mm scale. 90437 was built in 2017 . Oakville and JLTRT kits respectively - although the Oakville one has had two rebuilds..

    IMG_8730.JPG.b54dd5a644127f71469343a88bc9f1bc.JPG

    • Like 16
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  5. Once you start running the layout, some of the planning deficiences come to light. There was a limited number of trains that could use the down line from Bulwell Common, so I put in a crossover between the up and down storage lines so that trains stored in a fan of sidings off the up line could run on to the down.

    IMG_8705.JPG.f4052359a916d020b700003e34d9f1ed.JPG

     

    Anyway, once wired in and tidied up, it created a direct short. I had forgotten to de-link the two closure rails. So with some choice words, it all had to come up again... Experiments to extend the wifi in to the railway room are still unsuccesful - it is a metal clad building...

    IMG_8706.JPG.92b4657820ff2ae8933bac6ea158d48a.JPG

     

    One of the movements it allows now - is 'engine and brake' from Annesley going West to a colliery pick up. Except that the fireman seems to have mistaken local passenger for light engine... Oh... and that fireman is a Modelu me!

    IMG_8717.JPG.34e58f34294ccb592dd2d5dca327a6bc.JPG

    • Like 16
    • Agree 1
  6. A new addition to the Derby line fleet:- a J50 obtained at a bargain price ( certainly less than the constituant parts ) from the bring and buy at Guildex. Colwick sent a pilot daily down to Basford North and I thought this would make a change from the '350 that I've been using.
    Its nicely built, but needed a little attention to the running to eliminate a tight spot. After reaming the bearings, adjusting the plunger pick ups, it turned out to be a tight coupling rod.
    It just need some cosmetic springs, and a vac pipe down one side - oh and renumbering from a Hornsey resident to a Colwick one. J50s are a typical loco picking exercise, there are a lot of detail differences between batches. So a review of the RCTS and Yeadon narrowed it down to 68927. The only real fault I can find is it lacks the staring eyes of the prototype's 2ft spectacles, the ones on the model are a little undersize.. It looks like it's one of Jim's kits, currently out of production.

    IMG_4230.JPG.5c40cea85b93855c2214c1fb49ad8855.JPG

    • Like 7
  7. Spiders - 

    I have the same problem and despite a regular vacuum attack on them, they are still coming, especially those 'ghost' spiders that have very fine legs. I asked the very same question on the Guild forum as I recall John Elliott mentioning using a 'smoke bomb'. If you Google search 'defumigation bomb' that will bring up a few options....  I shall try one and report back...

     

    Collections and demise...

    I created a spreadsheet with all the railway assets and my wife helped me compile it - she then has a very good idea of the collections value.

     

    I've been assisting a widow with a good friends collection and workshop. Finding new homes for a lifetimes collection of models, tools, books, kits and workshop equipment is quite a task. I go every couple of months to work through what is there. Stuff I know about, I have sold on individually, even then, I don't always get the prices right, but the only way to move some stuff is job lots on Ebay or via the Guild. Stuff I don't know about, I try and find an expert or specialist in that area. Tools and machine stuff is nigh on impossible, everyone with an interest is usaully fully kitted out. The only way with the hand tools is a trader that specialises in second hand, in which case just a fraction of the real value will be realised, or the other option is a charity. Realistically resellers have to make a living from what they do, so one has to accept that. The significant factor is the time, sorting listing, packing and trips to the post office - I don't resent that, I just wanted to do right by my friend. I have gained one or two items from the collection in payment, but my friends interest was in a different period and region. I found from my own colelction - books, unless they are particularly rare are difficult to move on too....

     

    Regards

    Tony

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 6
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  8. More rain facilitates more progress on Basford North - so to stop people and vehicles plunging over the top  of the retaining wall at the end of the back siding, I've erected a rail and tube fence - still in primer. The rod joiners were made from 1.2mm thn wall tube. When I was laying track, I retained all of the offcuts..  There still seems to be miles of fencing to put up...

    IMG_8525.JPG.e2c515aadee978f88feab13781cf480d.JPG

    • Like 12
    • Craftsmanship/clever 4
  9. Now trains are running again, a previously intermittent problem came back fully. In the original plan, the points avoided the baseboard joins. When Jim kindly added the transition curves to the Templot plan, everything moved. So turnout 88 was cut across the baseboard join. In the event, I decided to make the station area permanent. What I forgot to do was to connect feed to the now isolated secions of rail, and to complicate the matter, this was one of my early turnouts with only one or two shims connecting the wing rails to the frog. So I had to make new connections and joined them underneath. I always make the connection to the underside of the rail, when it's in the web, it looks awful. A tidy up and cosmetic plastic fish plates will complete the job.

    IMG_8517.JPG.84a3d541209d34243121bf53d946e3dd.JPG

    • Like 9
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  10. I'm not sure I could fiit 10 coaches!

     

    Another working day with Geoff and Alisdair has resulted in a lot of progress. There is a lot of detail work to do , but the basic scenery is taking shape.

    IMG_8479.JPG.db3a4bbb31d2fa48f57c261ba5fe81fa.JPG

    • Like 14
    • Round of applause 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  11. I like my DCC, but I wouldn't say it was necessarily better than DC, I just prefer it, and with a technical background I'm quite happy to fiddle with it. There is room for everyone. The bottom line is that any mechanism has to work perfectly on DC before it's worth fitting a decoder. I was given a 4mm kit built Caley 0-4-4 to fit a decoder too. The chassis would not run.... diagnosis: Insulated and non insulated Romfords on the each side and quartering set at 180 degrees! Not to mention vague pick ups,,,

     

    Then the resulting birds nest of wires... everything had to wrapped in tape 'cos of the live frames.

    IMG_8462.JPG.3b3ed80f801645e3cbace895f734da64.JPG

     

    It runs fine now.

     

    Regards

    Tony

     

    • Like 13
    • Agree 1
    • Round of applause 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  12. Now that the rain has come back, I've returned to the workbench. York Modelmaking kindly enlarged their 4mm scale GN footbridge for me.

    IMG_8457.JPG.d1c454422f774007f00646de0424da7f.JPG

     

    It's not exactly the same as Basfords, but close enough. There is always the balance of available time against accuracy! I needed to shorten it though.

    IMG_8458.JPG.4cca2b83acc978bbeea34267dc2927c7.JPG

     

    The stairs make up nicely

    IMG_8459.JPG.85ea6375ecd9acac0914e76f34d6d1ce.JPG

     

    It's cut from quite a tough styrene, the only solvent that would touch it was Plastic Weld.

    • Like 13
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  13. On 04/07/2023 at 14:43, Tony Wright said:

    Good afternoon,

     

    The following might help...........

     

    GresleySecondPantry.jpg.d442af1b41284ae74a5d42f88526cb56.jpg

     

    A Gresley Pantry Second.

     

    This is Tony Geary's work, and since he reads this column regularly he might like to comment on how he made it. 

     

    ThompsonPantrySecond02.jpg.5c64cfec47b54fa9020d8e6f235ee505.jpg

     

    And a Thompson equivalent.

     

    Again, Tony's work (I think this has Southern Pride sides).

     

    PantryThird.jpg.1b9cb90e7e8306b114c550d35a9be1e8.jpg

     

    And one built by Alan Buckenham for the late Geoff Brewin. I think this uses SP sides and Comet components.

     

    The branding is incorrect here. The BR roundel should be below 'Restaurant Car', not between. 

     

    ThompsonPantrySecond01.jpg.4101c2cb50b51d06c768db87752efa2e.jpg

     

    And, finally, a Thompson Pantry Second built/painted by me. 

     

    This uses SP sides on top of an old Bachmann donor (with the roof re-profiled), running on cast metal HD bogies. 

     

    In all cases, these are branded 'Restaurant Car', and since the three on LB all run in partnership with either an RK, RU or RF, I think that's appropriate. 

     

    Regards,

     

    Tony. 

     

     

    Apologies for the delayed response, I've been away on holiday. If I can remember that far back, I think the pantry 3rd was made up from a set of Comet open third sides. The extra panelling and windows were made up from brass strip and some scrap etch sheet. I used an Isinglass drawing. The window spacing on the open 3rd was just about right for the job, and although I cannot guarantee 100% accuracy, it looks right!

     

    It is very gratifying to see models I made quite some time ago in service and giving enjoyment.

     

    Regards

    Tony

     

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...