Jump to content
 

Suzie

Members
  • Posts

    2,729
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Suzie

  1. It is getting so hard to work out what is best. I used to have Economy 7 to heat my greenhouse, but the saving in cheap rate electricity was fully eaten up by the extra standing charge which made it a complete waste of time - most of the heating was done in the evening rather than the early hours.

     

    Now I have an electric car I suspect that the small amount of electricity used for charging the car will not justify going over to a similar tariff, even though a 4-hour window is adequate for a full charge at 7kW. Having a Leaf with a small battery often requires a mid-day top up for a couple of hours at day rate anyway. Current annual night usage appears to be about 1100kWh - is the extra standing charge more than £150 per year?

     

    Things might change soon though if I move house and get a better car, the new place has acres of suitable roof so will take a lot of panels, and will probably justify getting 3-phase so the new (100kWh) car will be 75% charged in the 4-hour window. Might still be worth charging the car at night though and exporting from solar and battery storage at peak times at ~100A (3x32A). It is well complicated. I am not convinced that any supplier is likely to be on top of all the pros and cons...

    • Agree 1
  2. It looks like you don't have enough current available for the momentary short when the train enters the the reversing section.

     

    I am not familiar with the particular hardware you are using, but it may be that the DR5013 is taking too long to switch which may be due to a high impedance somewhere in the wiring either feeding the DR5013 or in the track feeds.

     

    Yes, different sound locos will draw different amounts of current so you have one loco that just draws a few milliamps extra that is the straw that breaks the camel's back.

  3. Simple answer:- There will generally be four wires going to the Next-18 socket, and you can just splice these on to your decoder wires or solder directly to the next-18 decoder (many small decoders are just the Next-18 decoder with wires attached instead of the plug).

     

    Issues that will occur:-

    1.  Next-18 (and PluX) sockets include a defined space that the decoder will fit in to. Using a non-standard sized decoder will most likely mean that you will have to clear some space somewhere in the loco for the decoder and wires, especially for a sound decoder with a speaker and stay alive. Next-18s socket has room for a sound decoder.
    2. Next-18 (and PluX, and MTC-21) use very reliable connectors that are likely to make a connection when plugged in that will outlast most amateur soldered connections (especially if lead is involved).
    3. It is an awful lot of work to no advantage, especially when Next-18 (and PluX) decoders of the finest quality can be had for £25.

    The Next-18 socket is nothing like the somewhat less reliable NEM651 6-pin or NEM652 8-pin connectors which you might consider replacing with a hard wired connection for a good reason.

    • Agree 2
    • Thanks 1
  4. Clearly a layout of this type will have some compromises to be able to accommodate both DC and DCC. The big question is which way the compromises go - and how much of an I.T. project you want to make it.

     

    It sounds like you already have a good system to manage queuing in the fiddle yard, so why not just enable DC running on the DCC stock to facilitate using the DC queuing system where DCC trains are stopped by the driver when they enter the fiddle yard, the points are changed to the next clear road and relays switch over to DC - the reverse happens when leaving.

     

    I suspect it might be a lot easier and cheaper for the club to pay for DCC fitting of DC members' stock (£25 per loco - you can probably fit forty or so locos for what the DC wiring is going to cost) to just make the layout full DCC and a lot easier to wire - but you have the brief you are given!

     

    • Agree 1
  5. 14 minutes ago, 30801 said:

     

    We were supposed to have a similar Casio. I asked my dad for one and he said I could use his old one instead.

    It was one of these:

    s-l1600.jpg.1c34711b023ae03f2136c1822df7eff1.jpg

    I have a Commodore 9190 somewhere which is a higher spec model, and I think it is worth about three times what it cost new - or perhaps not since it cost about a week's wages!

    • Like 1
  6. On 15/11/2023 at 23:23, Andy Kirkham said:

    I want to buy a new portable DAB radio and this one is attractive and has good reviews https://www.argos.co.uk/product/3243053

     

    However I see that it has a built-in battery which I don't think is replaceable, so when the battery becomes exhausted, the radio will cease permanently to be portable. I queried this with Roberts, who responded promptly, saying that the battery was reckoned to be good for 500 cycles so that if it were recharged once every week it would last for 10 years. It seems a bit odd to me that none of the many reviews  have read mentions this as a drawback. On the other hand I don't think any of the DAB radios I've had has lasted as much as 10 years without some significant bit of it failing, so I wonder if it is worth quibbling about the finite life of the battery. Do we have to accept that consumer goods like this only last a few years?

     

    If it has cylindrical cells then the chance is that the battery will not be the first to fail, most likely the broadcast services will be withdrawn first.

     

    I am still very sad that my newest radio - a nice internet one with a fancy colour display that shows the weather - has had to be put away on a shelf because the BBC has withdrawn its internet streams and Times never bothered to start one so there is nothing left I want to listen to on it.

     

    My car is now ten years old and still operating on its original battery, so rechargeable lithium batteries are a lot better than they used to be.

     

    When I got my Pure Evoke 2 DAB radio I got NiMh batteries for it - they lasted considerably longer than the on/off switch which is nigh on impossible to replace because it is inaccessible. If it worked I would be able to listen to Times and Radio 4 though...

    • Informative/Useful 2
  7. 6 hours ago, Pint of Adnams said:

    ...The last train on 5th May 1951 comprised an ex-W&U Tram Car E60462 sandwiched between the two ex-Stoke Ferry Brakes E62261 & E62262. The train locomotive was J69/1 68578.

     

    If the last train could not use both tramcars, then I guess it is most unlikely that they were used together. 92 passengers is a lot (two tramcars and a brake) - that would take three Osborne buses to replace the service!

     

    I guess I will just have to invoke rule-1. I have a couple of Hattons brakes on order for modification (new wheels, move the guard's ducket and sort the end windows) so I can eventually make up a rake of  Brake-Tram-Tram-Brake for a Treacle Mines special excursion to Tudwick for 116 passengers...

    • Like 2
  8. I have my BR tramcar pair now, and I was looking at pictures to see what a likely complete train would look like, but I have not seen a train with both tramcars in it in BR days. I have seen:-

    • Two Stoke Ferry 6-wheel brakes.
    • One Stoke Ferry Brake and a tramcar.
    • Two stoke Ferry brakes around a tramcar.

    Surely they must have run together at some point!

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  9. The formulas are different for different manufacturers. Typically the decoder will have a regular polling time where it will add or subtract a an amount from the current speed until it reaches the target speed each time it polls. There are better ways to do it so some might adjust the amount added to create a smoother transition to the target speed.

     

    Storage on a decoder is not a big issue nowadays, and there is plenty of processing power to do what is quite a simple task in the scheme of things.

     

    Have a look at the source code for some of the DIY decoders that you can make such as the MERG or DIY Decoder Project to see how it is done.

    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  10. I guess a key question is how are you operating your points.

     

    If you are operating the points and signals from your throttle then you might like to power the accessory bus direct from your Z21, and using a booster to power the track.

     

    If you are using a computer or similar with software like JMRI to operate your points and signals then it might be worth investing in a Sprog3 to run your accessory bus as a seperate command station.

  11. I would recommend that you try a Bachmann E-Z Command which are available from eBay or similar:-

     

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/204472640662

     

    spacer.png

    For £50 it gives you a nice DCC controller to test your new purchases, and if you grow out of it you should be able to move it on with little loss (if you don't find it too useful and want to keep it!)

     

    It only has limited addressing, limited access to functions (so not ideal for fancy sound), and very limited CV programming capability, but is very, very easy to use. You would be surprised at how often these are used at exhibitions (I use one on one of my exhibition layouts).

  12. Even with just ten roads of staging it is not hard to create a train sequence that takes two hours to run through, meaning that the sequence (and each train) gets run about three times during a normal show day. This makes for an orderly packing away of stock over the final two hours of running as each train completes its final visit to the staging.

     

    Running freight trains at prototypical speed does sometimes have its advantages.

    • Like 6
    • Agree 2
  13. The only advantage using low voltage DC overhead has nowadays is that you don't need the transformer/rectifier on the train. This is an adavantage on a closed tram system where you have a lot of trams and can save a lot of space/weight/money not fitting all those rectifiers and transformers to the trams and just provide a few at substations, but no advantage on a proper railway with just a few trains where the 25KV feed can be taken directly from the main line feed and standard AC trains can be used with no need to provide any substations (the Braintree branch is a good example of how to get an electrified branch line on the cheap!)

    • Like 1
  14. 11 hours ago, black and decker boy said:

    good to have new infrastructure but BP Pulse are now very much a distress purchase for me

     

    When you compare the new NEC Pulse offering to the Braintree electric forecourt it looks a bit meagre. 

     

    I can never rely on using Pulse chargers as with just two at Colchester and one at Boreham there is always a long queue at weekends. I guess BP don't really care as there is only one other fast charger in Chelmsford so not much competition. It would be nice to just drive straight to Chelmsford and charge there rather than have to go via Braintree and charge at the Electric Forecourt both on the way there and on the way back adding about an hour and a half to the journey!

  15. Looks like a handy little unit. I suspect there would have been a lot less old Leaf batteries if they had put enough batteries in the Leaf in the first place.

     

    Surely the only reason you would get rid of a Leaf is because the range was inadequate - the cars are built well enough for a life considerably longer than ten years - mine is ten years old and you would not know that it was not brand new apart from only having about 80% battery capacity.

  16. On 27/08/2023 at 18:05, mswjr said:

    ...Where is the best place to buy all the components that i need for servo point operation...

     

    I would recommend CoastalDCC. You might not want to get all the parts from one manufacturer, but Coastal do stock a few different makes of equipment.

     

    You will need:-

    • Servo
    • Servo mount
    • Servo controller/(decoder)/(frog switch)
    • Extension cables

    There are two types of servo - digital (eg SG92R) and analogue (eg SG90) and some controllers work better with one type rather than the other.

     

    Servo mounts come in a variety of styles from a simple bracket to bolt the servo to all the way to a complete servo motor that is a drop in replacement for a Peco Solenoid.

     

    Servo controllers can be just the simple Megapoints that just operates the servo right up to the Signalist SC2 with integrated frog switching and DCC decoder. There are others in between like the Peco which has a basic controller with a range of add-ons to perform the other functions.

     

    You should mount the servo controller near the servos, you don't want long runs of servo wire, but sometimes you will need a short extension cable.

    • Informative/Useful 1
  17. On 27/08/2023 at 20:51, brossard said:

    ...What is the advantage to using servos?

     

    Price, servos are very cheap. Especially when you want DCC control the servo control can be built in to the DCC decoder combining two functions (such as when you use the ESU Switchpilot servo decoder or the Signalist SC2).

     

    Tortoise and Cobalt are not servos and cost a lot more - not specifically worse or better than servos, just different.

    • Like 1
  18. 17 minutes ago, TheQ said:

    How's this for a pylon

    image.png.20c25add5d749d0b7d2ebb58a3075a15.png

    350ft tall it's the last remaining chain home transmitter mast, and has been retained by the RAF for teaching aerial riggers...

     

    There are still a few Chain Home masts about. Here is one still in situ at Little Bromley. The three little arms used to hold 'flyswatter' reflectors for horns mounted lower down the mast from the days before dishes were used for microwave communications:-

     

    Great_Bromley.jpg

     

    Marconi moved one from the coast to Great Baddow after the war and that is still around, although I am not sure that it is used for anything now (Picture from Flickr):-

    Great Baddow Chain Home Tower

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...