Jump to content
 

G.M.R.

Members
  • Posts

    120
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by G.M.R.

  1. Have been making some progress over the past few weeks. Too cold in the garage so working on the removable boards indoors. Starting to get the shed area into shape:- The workshop is still at the primer stage. Next is to start to match the brickwork with the shed. The water tower is from Skytrex and has been a new experience for me. I received a set of parts, but the assembly is largely left to the builder working from photos of the real thing. The coal stage is from Ten Commandments and is next for the paint shop. Still plenty to do, but I think it’s going to work despite the limited space.
  2. Thanks Ray. Yes the levers are connected to the locking bars as you might see here… There are micros witches behind the levers which operate when they are pulled. These switches are detected by an arduino program which then sends the Dcc codes to the layout on the accessory bus.
  3. Hi Ray, The levers and frame are built from two MSE 7 lever kits. An additional lever is a dummy spare and simplifies the joining of the two units. Here are a couple of views under the top. .. nearest lever reversed nearest lever returned to normal and now locked. If you look carefully you can see in the first of those last three that the fourth lever from the left (an FPL) is back locked and in the last photo it is back in normal and unlocked. Being there has caused the first lever (Home signal) to lock.
  4. A few photos from this morning …… Recently finished the pub, oak tree and bus stop. Everything has to be built in lift off modules and stored away from the fold up board. My first O Gauge signal and the Peco signal box. Small arm cleared for the tank to enter the loco service line. My latest project. A fully interlocked lever frame. Locking is performed with servo motors and the levers interface to the layout through DCC, driving the accessory bus.
  5. Another photo from the same end showing partial construction of the goods shed. I spent a good number of weeks constructing a couple of card based buildings. Both are half relief and intended for the back scene. They are based on Scalescenes downloads but scaled up with a lot of patience. I don’t have an A3 printer! Here they are in place… The church tower helps to hide the discontinuity in the garage wall
  6. A view from the other end with the fold up board ballasted. I have allowed for a Small Prairie tank in the headshunt and have one in order. Still delayed from an expected availability of last April. I’ve continued to work with laser cut kits for some of the buildings. The almost complete Station building is shown roughly in place.
  7. Well having explained that I had started an interest in my post “Catching the O Gauge bug!”, I thought it was time I started a post to describe my efforts towards constructing a small layout in the garage. Here is a view from one end, giving an idea of the plan. Single platform face. Run around loop. Small yard to the right. Engine service siding near left. Two boards. The furthest hinges up against the wall. The nearest stores in a rack behind the camera. The track will continue onto three of the boards I made for the garden so that short trains can be run out and back around the inside of the garage. I started this during the summer and will go on to post some photos of how it’s developed so far.
  8. Have you sorted it yet? I have just fitted sound to mine and had the same problem until I securely clicked the body onto the chassis at the non exhaust end. Everything fine after it was all screwed back together.
  9. Hi John, Great pictures as ever. Must be years now since we began sharing layout progress. Granby Junction has developed superbly. Something you might find interesting is that I've just received a J27 ordered over 2yrs ago and made by Oxford Rail. I bought one already equipped with the DCC chip and Sound. It has an unusual but very useful function, F15. It performs the "Kadee Shuffle". So with the coupling over the magnet, a press of F15, and the loco creeps backward a little, pauses, then steps forward complete with a chuff. I hope we see this replicated in other chips in the future. Regards Geoff
  10. Very sad news. Will keep great memories of playing trains and golf. Rip Gordon.
  11. Set the garden layout up again today. Third time, but today was almost ten degree warmer than previous times. Also strong midday sunshine. Was still surprised by the amount of rail expansion. Had to trim back several sections to remove the buckling that started to occur. Guess that's a problem all the permanent garden layout folk are used to and presumably solve by having frequent rail gaps?
  12. Probably posted in the wrong thread John, but saw you replied in both. Taking inspiration from your photo, I removed the gangway assembly, refitted the end door inside the coach, and now the hook is exposed making coupling the screwlink from the loco possible. Thanks
  13. You got me thinking with your helpful photo there John. I had already had to repair the gangway assembly so knew how that came apart. I removed it and then fixed one of the supplied end doors inside the coach using blacktack. Now the hook of the coupling is visible and similar to the non corridor coaches I have so I can get the screwlink from the loco over it. Thanks for triggering the thought process A spot of black paint over the two magnets that are showing on the buffer beam and it will look fine for me. In hindsight, I would have been better off with a non-corridor tender, but there you go.
  14. Actually the coaches are already fitted with them to keep the gangways together within the rake in addition to the buckeyes. I could try fitting some to the loco tender, but I think the weight of the coaches would likely be too much pull for the magnets to hold. but appreciate the idea
  15. Guessed that might be suggested. I am used to NEM sockets in 4mm stock. Looking at fitting Kadees or similar to these is worrying at first. Not that there isn't space, but the thought of starting to hack around some very expensive items is of concern. If anyone has photos of how it's done, I would appreciate seeing them.
  16. There is also a problem with the packaging. The use of stiff polystyrene puts a strain on the gangway ends which resulted in one end being broken on each of the three coaches I received. Fixed with some cyanoacrylate, but could have been easily avoided with a small change to the packaging design. I have too more on pre-order and will cut a piece out of the polystyrene before I attempt to remove them.
  17. They come with buckeye couplings fitted to all the internal rake ends, and the gangways contain hidden magnets to grip the outer ends together. The rake ends on the BSKs are fitted with screwlink couplings, but I couldn't couple up my Flying Scotsman with its gangway tender. I need a miniature robotic shunter or fireman!
  18. Lionheart Mk1 coaches arrived yesterday. I think they are magnificent. Although there were some problems.
  19. Took delivery of Lionheart Mk1 coaches yesterday. They are lovely and internally within the rake include already fitted buckeye couplings. But on the ends of the rakes - outer end of the BSKs, they have screwlink. Connect the rake to a Hattons Original Flying Scotsman with corridor tender ........ I couldn't do it!! Even with ideas posted above. I ended up connecting the two outer screw links together with a piece of wire, just to be able to run the train around the garden. I need to be able to remove from the track and replace when I want to play. Any ideas?
  20. Six months later and a sunny afternoon: - Took 45 seconds for the circuit with Flying Scotsman at full speed.
  21. Here are a couple of photos showing one of the curved boards with just the inner track laid.
  22. Taking an 8x4 sheet of ply, I calculated that if I used planks 285mm wide, I could cut each into two trapezium shapes with the ends at 18deg angles so that they could then be fitted together as shown in the diagram. The pair being supported on a simple frame was then reasonably easy to carry, and five of them would form a complete circle. I could fit two tracks spaced at 90mm (more than the recommended 80 to allow for plenty of passing space on the curve). The outer track radius is 1872mm and the inner 1782mm which seemed reasonable for the space available. Also these boards would then fit well into the 4 metre diameter grass circles at each end of the lawn. And so construction began towards the end of last summer.
  23. Thanks for all the supporting comments. So to continue my adventure into the "senior" scale. Having enjoyed constructing this small layout, my thoughts turned to how I could create something larger. I do like to watch trains running, but whilst the 12 by 12 bedroom I have use of is fine for my OO layout, it would allow any continuous runs for O gauge, and I didn't really want to lose my existing layout with my largish collection of locos. I am lucky enough to have a double garage which is largely empty, except that unusually we do keep two cars in it. Even then at roughly 5 metres square, it is still too tight to have a sensible continuous run. So how about the garden? We are both retired, and now the garden is very much to domain of my better half. She is very supportive of my railway mania, but wasn't keen to have her landscape modified to take major civil engineering for a railway. So I made a proposal. How about I built a "Train Set" that could be erected around the perimeter of the grass lawn, and removed again when I had finished playing trains. This was acceptable, so I then had to start thinking about how. The lawn I not rectangular or round. It consists of two offset circles connected by a square. So the design would have to include both curves and straights. I reckoned that I could get a double track run of some 70ft which would include a four track station area long enough for five Mk1 coaches and large loco. I felt that I wanted to use 18mm ply, on a simple 2x1 type of frame, but kept light enough to carry from storage to lawn. Here is what I came up with for the curves. Curve Boards.pdf
  24. 12 months ago to the day, when it was becoming clear that life might be different for a while, I decided that the time may have come to start experimenting with a larger scale. Having an extensive bedroom layout in OO, I felt it time for a change, and I reckoned I could get a 4ft by 2ft board under part of the layout to accommodate something in O. After a lot of research on here and other sites, I decided a small shed scene would suit. I am not much of a loco kit builder so looked for a reasonably priced RTR loco for the project. Dapol were shipping some new versions of their 57xx including one in London Transport Livery. And so I purchased L92 and the fun began. Before we were confined to home, I visited the local DIY store to get a few items of timber to construct a simple baseboard. And then considered what the track plan might be. Being unfamiliar with this scale, it was hard to imagine what could be sensibly fitted in the space. I purchased a single Peco turnout and played a little. I grew up in the 50's and early 60's quite close to Neasden, (London) and my father worked just off the North Circular Road, so I became very familiar with the London Underground. Looking at some wonderful archive photos, I went for a very simplified nod to Neasden Shed. Not a true representation in any way, but something to base things on. It took me 3 months to build, but then I didn't have much else to do with my time. Here are a few photos of the result. I had caught the O Gauge bug. Loved the feel of the larger stock. I knew that I now needed to do more. And so my story continued, but more later.
  25. Thank you both. I will have a go at producing both types and see how I get on.
×
×
  • Create New...