Jump to content
 

Dapol 4D-011-002D Streamlined Railcar W10 in BR lined chocolate and cream - DCC Fitted


Sol
 Share

Recommended Posts

It arrived in quick time from the UK - looks nice but certainly not the same type of drive as other Dapol DMU's

tried to re-programme address to 18 from default 3, the decoder took it as the loco moved a bit but did not respond to the being asked to move - it still was on address 3

but it likes long address OK but the main problem are the flanges - doesn't like Peco Code 75 track work, Code 100 is OK

 

has any one else found this problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I have sorted out the addressing problem. I now find this...

does not like code 75 track at all  because as it stands, it only runs without any bumps & jumps through Code 100.

yet another Dapol DMU that I have  4D-009-HAT06 Class 12 bubble car has no problems even with Shinohara Code 70 track

Using a NMRA track/wheel gauge, one can see that the flanges on Class 121 DMU are smaller than those on the GWR railcar W10.

 

And Hattons from whom I got both DMU & GWR railcar have wiped their hands & referred me to Dapol

Edited by Sol
add last sentence
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dapol suggested I contact their parts supplier DCCsupplies which I did and they only have complete bogies so I responded...

 

Thanks Richard but no certainty that the flanges of those bogies will allow good running through Peco code 75 turnouts & diamond crossings.
 The GWR Railcar was on working display tonight on an operating session with 4 mates & they noticed how it bumped through the turnouts & they too checked the flange depth & back to back  compared against other Dapol DMUs with the NMRA gauge & said " yes those flanges on the railcar are crap - bet they are not NMRA RP 25/110  recommendations!"  That NMRA recommendation is almost identical to
https://doubleogauge.com/intermediate-wheels/

I did ask Dapol this

Is it because this railcar was an earlier model & the wheel sets have now been upgraded?
So a  bogie from the same manufacturer has different wheel standards ?


and the answer from

Kevin Grindley

Sales Admin Manager

Dapol Ltd

was

Sorry but I do not know the specifics but, as we use more than 1 factory in China I suppose  it is possible that they might be slightly different.

So it seems Dapol have no idea of what standards they use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

It sounds more like that one person doesn't know what's going rather than Dapol as a whole, but either way, it's not a good message to be putting out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The flanges on the Express parcels van from Dapol using the same bogies, has finer flanges than my railcar - even visually, the difference is obvious. Tried it on an unballasted layout - yes OK but with any slight ballast sticking up, the flanges find them  - the only motive power unit of my fleet of 28 that does this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

All the manufacturers use a range of factories in China.  It's why you get, at random, cool white, warm white or even yellow front lighting on Farish diesels.  I don't think ISO 9000 or the Deming Cycle ever made it to China, and you get what you're given.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Replacement bogies arrived today from DCC Supplies under warranty & even without using a gauge, one can see that the flanges on these are finer than the originals - just now have to work out how to get into works ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...