Jump to content
 
  • entries
    63
  • comments
    104
  • views
    41,265

PART 5A 1308 LADY MARGARET THE MISSING PHOTOS [1-5]


sleeper

777 views

I've had considerable problems with posting photos but when I posted them to the test area they came up ok [ called Murphy's law] or something like that.

Right in part 5 you'll see 12345 listed where the photo's should be here they are in that order:-

 

1

blogentry-15272-0-63027200-1358441230.jpg

 

2

blogentry-15272-0-10301400-1358441300.jpg

 

3

blogentry-15272-0-80323000-1358441344.jpg

 

4

blogentry-15272-0-37997600-1358441400.jpg

 

5

blogentry-15272-0-65706900-1358441444.jpg

 

Shhh it seems to have worked.

 

Conclusions drawn? I talk to 'kin much!!

 

TTFN

  • Like 5

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

I've learn now, you can't add too much content into these entries, the poor old RMW server won't take it, so in future I need to split it up more. I'm sorry if it's spoiled your reading of this blog.

Hopefully future entries will be 'as they happen' making for shorter entries the last few have been posted in retrospect making for large files of text plus numerous photos.

Link to comment

That's a great looking loco now that it has a coat or two of paint on. It certainly is an inspiration for me now to scratchbuild sometime in the future instead of kit bashing.

 

I look forward to seeing the completed model, oh and those close ups look good too.

 

Jim

Link to comment

Looks good. I dislike painting plastic, it is ok if it is not filled with static and attracting every bit of dust from the house.

I think the early GW green was more like brunswick than the later more olive looking one.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Now that looks great with a coat of paint on it. :)

 

Nice work and really captures the prototype well.  Will you paint out the handrails too?

 

Totally agree with Jim-Nice close ups ;)

 

Cheers,

 

Mark

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Lovely lady! :-)

 

I'm curious about your problems with the images. I haven't noticed any issues myself, except that the first image in every post does not show up on the main page of the blog (but is fine when you view the blog entry itself). What was the problem exactly, maybe we can help?

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Thanks guys for the kind words of encouragement.

Aberdare.

Jim I'm glad you've got your scratch builders hat on now, go for it. The shots through the Loup were purely random, I erased more than I kept because they were too out of focus. you can see on one shot the side of the cab is blurred but the inside is in focus, just need to get the distance right.

N15 class

I hadn't thought about static being the reason for the dust in the paint, good point. maybe the paint swirl over the plastic builds up the static, some kind of grounding strap required?

46444

Hi Mark, thanks for the comments, I spent some time reading through your blog, you're certainly a dab hand with the weathering. Regarding the handrails do you think they'd look better painted green to match the body or brass coloured?

Mikkel

The problem I had wasn't apparent when uploading the photos and attaching them but afterwards.

When previewing and submitting the post there were no photos just Icons, which, when clicked upon didn't do anything.

I tried posting them one by one in a separate entry - no problem. It was due to me trying to post too much content at once, a lesson learned for the future. Thanks for the offer of help.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

46444

Hi Mark, thanks for the comments, I spent some time reading through your blog, you're certainly a dab hand with the weathering. Regarding the handrails do you think they'd look better painted green to match the body or brass coloured?

 

Evening Roly,

 

Thanks for comments re: my weathering. Which reminds me-I better fire up the airbrush again soon and finish a few bits off.

 

I would have imagined that the handrails would have been green on the bodywork and black around the smokebox. However, I'm not an expert of this period of GWR locos and would imagine a 'PM' to Mikkel would answer your question.

 

Hope that helps Roly, and look forwards to the next instalment.

 

Cheers,

 

Mark

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

The problem I had wasn't apparent when uploading the photos and attaching them but afterwards.

When previewing and submitting the post there were no photos just Icons, which, when clicked upon didn't do anything.

I tried posting them one by one in a separate entry - no problem. It was due to me trying to post too much content at once, a lesson learned for the future. Thanks for the offer of help.

Odd that. But good to hear you got it sorted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I'm no expert either, but the general principle was polished steel pre 1906, and as per Mark's description after 1906.

 

See http://www.gwr.org.uk/liveriesloco1900.html

and http://www.gwr.org.uk/liveriesloco1906.html :-

 

Thanks guys for the info and links.

 

I've looked on Wikipedia and found this history

 

"The Liskeard and Caradon Railway was exceedingly successful while mineral extraction boomed, but it was entirely dependent on that traffic and when the mines and quarries declined, the Railway followed. From 1909 [the year that Lady Margareth was built] the railway was worked by the Great Western Railway, but its days were already numbered, and it closed in 1917, its track materials being removed in aid of the war effort."

 

So it looks like the handrails need to be green as Mark states, a bit of a pity really because other than  the brass handrails it's quite bland, maybe when I get the named and number plates they'll brighten it up a bit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...