Thinking about scale, the 1/50 project
During the lockdown periods various things set me thinking about scale. Somewhere in my head is a desire to have a go at some modelling in a bigger scale. Something I can actually see as I age. Perhaps something a bit out of the ordinary, perhaps something out of the UK spectrum. Hmm, but what ?
So the next logical scale up would be O. Thing is, which flavour of O, and anyway it isn’t really unusual. Folk would just compare anything you do to that which is commercially available. Anyway, this is about making stuff not about buying stuff.
I understand how many of the scales and gauges have come about and the reasons that some represent more compromise than others. Once that happens someone decides that they need standards which manufacturers bend to suit themselves. The debate is endless, I’m not joining in.
So, thinking continental and metric.
Hmm.
1/150 Far too small.
1/100. Still too small.
1/75. Kinda far too close to what I already do.
1/50. Now that has a certain appeal. 20mm to the metre. 1mm to 50mm. Yes, its odd numbers converted to imperial, but the entire point of the exercise is to think metric not imperial.
So I did a bit of research. Despite being arithmetically convenient 1/50 is not a scale that has attracted railway modellers. A few Japanese static kits, but no rtr, track or buildings. There are plenty of road vehicles and a range of Corgi trams, but no railway stuff.
A thought struck me. 20mm to the metre is really suggestive of metre gauge. I did a bit of research into that. Uk modellers, (apart from a few that follow Hom), just tend to ignore it. But there were, and still are relatively speaking a lot of metre gauge railways globally. Miles of the stuff, or should I say kilometers of the stuff.
Now although some might regard metre gauge as “narrow gauge” a lot of it isn’t. There are plenty of railways globally that run on metre track but have a loading gauge similar or greater than one one see on UK main lines. Serious sized trains, though fewer of them these days than were about in the 1950s and 60s.
So should I choose a prototype, do a lot of research and build accurate models in the same way that I strive to do with Kelvinbank? Hmm. The issue with that is my lack of fluency in other languages. I have a little, but nowhere near enough to study the detail of a specific prototype. It has been done, during my researches I came across this wonderful layout, albeit with a slightly underscale gauge.
https://www.narrowgaugenorth.org.uk/index.php/exhibitors/previous-years/134-pempoul#prettyPhoto
But, for the sake of argument, what if I went freelance? Base the ideas on a variety of prototypes, but not one in particular? It gets round the detailed research bit and just lets me mess about with ideas on the bench. That has a certain appeal.
Many folk will think all this is a bit daft. A scale not used, imaginary but realistically designed stock. Nothing available off the shelf, so a complete scratchbuild.
See what I can make without spending very much. But that is the appeal of it.
Anyway, sorry to ramble on a bit. Let’s see what the bits box yields.
- 4
- 5
- 2
13 Comments
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now