Jump to content
 

A London & Birmingham Novelty


5&9Models

940 views

 

I’ve long been entertained and intrigued by depictions of early railways of the 1830s and ‘40s. The period was marked by significant political and social change, the technology of the new iron roads symbolised these changes more than anything and the railway companies knew it. From the opening of the Liverpool & Manchester Railway onwards, artists such as Isaac Shaw, John Cooke Bourne, Thomas Talbot Bury and many others recorded what they saw, creating images that sought to commemorate and impress. From these illustrations lithographic prints were produced and distributed in quantity, in a way a form of propaganda, promoting the grandeur and unprecedented architectural and engineering achievements of the railways whilst at the same time demonstrating how harmoniously they would sit within the landscape, showing just how marvellous (and safe) it would be to travel by train.

 

The detail and accuracy of many images is praiseworthy, Shaw was a skilled engraver, Bourne a talented artist and Bury a noted architect however, some images must be taken with a full chip shop’s worth of salt, and a few would not look out of place hanging in a gallery of work by Salvador Dali. Therefore, one must never rely on such pictures as a clear window into the past but in the absence of photographs or files full of detailed and fully dimensioned drawings, they are all we have. 

 

Fig.1WatfordTunneldetail.jpg.89cc4f7f8066152c19ee28ffcd0ee782.jpg

Fig. 1. Detail of ‘The entrance to the tunnel at Watford’ by T. T. Bury, engraved by N. Fielding, published by Ackermann, London, 1837. 

 

The subject of this article is an oddity I noticed many years ago in a charming painting by T. T. Bury showing an impressive cutting on the London & Birmingham Railway. The little engine processes gaily towards the Watford tunnel entrance blissfully unaware that it is on the wrong line pulling eight open carriages, little more than trucks with seats, four enclosed second- and first-class carriages bringing up the rear. Sandwiched between these is one carriage which appears to be another open third but with raised full-height ends. Not only that, two passengers, apparently a couple, stand at seat back height looking forward down the train to the locomotive and the approaching tunnel. Trains in this period seldom reached speeds in excess of 25mph or so, but even at this pace standing on the end of the carriage would seem to be an extremely hazardous thing to do. Momentary loss of footing could result in serious injury, even death. Surely a flight of fancy on the part of the usually reliable artist I thought - but no. Buried in the London & Birmingham Railway minute books held at the National Archives is a short sentence that goes a long way to confirm that Thomas Talbot Bury was not pulling our legs. Dated 17th April 1837, minute 81 reads ‘Ordered - that Mr Bagster be authorised to give additional height to the ends of one or more of the third class carriages.’ It seems that this instruction was indeed carried out and remarkably Bury recorded one of these rare vehicles. Those familiar with my modelling will know that this is all the evidence I need to produce a model and it proved to be more straightforward that one might think.

 

After the opening of the London & Birmingham Railway, the board were left with a significant number of open carriages used initially to show-off the line but really only suitable for a third-class fare. Given that they had no intention of carrying third-class passengers something useful had to be done with them. Thankfully, they were sturdy enough to be converted into covered second-class carriages with the addition of brakes, full height ends and roofs whilst others formed the basis for entirely enclosed carriages. Our curious carriage would appear to be a half-way house for the daredevil traveller. In my quest for a good variety of London & Birmingham carriages I had already produced a cast white metal ‘kit’ for the open carriage based on drawings published by Samuel Brees in his ‘Railway Practice’ of 1842.

 

Fig.2Rawcastings.jpg.76cffe478a7d156415c6b4a3a83c6b27.jpg

Fig.2. The raw castings for the London & Birmingham open third awaiting cleaning and assembly.

 

The basic carriage was put together in the usual way, soldered construction with etched details and a set of resin cast seats which simply slot in place. Once completed, the carriage was thoroughly cleaned and given a coat of primer. The end extensions were then fabricated from styrene sheet and strip, and carefully glued in place. I decided that Bury’s suggestion that the two passengers were standing at the height of the seat back must be slightly incorrect. To do this would have required a substantial shelf at this height which would then prevent anyone from actually sitting on the end seats (unless the shelf folded up) and in fact standing on the seat itself would be sufficient to see over the carriage end and satisfy any burning desire to have one’s top hat blown off. 

 

Fig.3Assembledcarriage.jpg.9ac3e97b2151e04e632a8954da59b276.jpg

Fig.3. The assembled carriage in black undercoat with the end extensions made from black styrene.

 

The building of this curiosity took a few evenings work but the novelty of the finished carriage together with the point that it brings to life an otherwise forgotten or even unbelievable detail from the early days of railway travel was well worth it. As always, I am very grateful to Tom Nicholls for finding this little gem of information in the archives and providing the excuse I needed.

 

Fig.4.jpg.cb816c714614418a928766eeb992e529.jpg

Figs.4 The completed and painted carriage just requiring a couple of standing passengers with a ‘Devil-may-care’ attitude towards personal safety.

 

Fig.5.jpg.57cf32937b6dd8be6297dad1ab43fb39.jpg

 

Fig.6.jpg.2af7125ba3b2fade1be32787df7896a9.jpg

 

Fig.7.jpg.1381eaa23905ac5d431e6f9825bdb565.jpg

 

 

Edited by 5&9Models

  • Like 24
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 8
  • Round of applause 7

19 Comments


Recommended Comments

How on earth would a lady stand on a seat like that without flashing ankle? Totally unacceptable!

Best wishes 

Eric 

  • Funny 4
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

A nice model, it is an unusual vehicle.

 

Looking at the engraving I see that each of the four end  coaches has a brakesman.  I wonder whether that would be the reason for running such coaches at the rear of the train ? 

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Dave John said:

A nice model, it is an unusual vehicle.

 

Looking at the engraving I see that each of the four end  coaches has a brakesman.  I wonder whether that would be the reason for running such coaches at the rear of the train ? 

Thanks Dave,

You're probably correct about the position of the braked carriages although not all carriages with roof seats were fitted with brakes. First class carriages had roof seats at both ends and if they were fitted with brakes only one seat had a brake handle. Apparently in the early days you could buy a roof seat ticket much as you might do on a stage coach journey. I doubt that was particularly popular!

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Wonderful. I suppose the standing lady in Bury's painting means it cannot be urinals then? 🙂

 

Lovely figures too in very natural poses. Not Modelu I think?

 

 

 

  • Funny 1
Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Wonderful. I suppose the standing lady in Bury's painting means it cannot be urinals then? 🙂

 

Lovely figures too in very natural poses. Not Modelu I think?

 

 

 

Thanks Mikkel, not urinals but what a thought....! The gent is ModelU but the two ladies I carved from dental plaster and cast in white metal. Ok as long as you don't look too closely, they resemble Morph!

Morph.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to comment

Fantastic work.  Maybe you could post a picture of it next to a more modern vehicle (16T mineral, say) for a size comparison?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Lovely job! I assume that because the original inspiring image is an engraving that would explain the wrong line running? The plate is reversed in the print process.

  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment

The engraver is not much cop if he makes a basic mistake like that.

 

The engine up front looks to be a 0-2-2 like Rocket, not a 2-2-0 like the L&B Bury passenger engines, or indeed the L&M's Planet which replaced Rocket and it's class.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
21 hours ago, whart57 said:

The engraver is not much cop if he makes a basic mistake like that.

 

The engine up front looks to be a 0-2-2 like Rocket, not a 2-2-0 like the L&B Bury passenger engines, or indeed the L&M's Planet which replaced Rocket and it's class.

Stephenson’s engines were not welcomed on the London & Birmingham. It was exclusively run with Edward Bury 2-2-0 and 0-4-0 locomotives. Any resemblance to Rocket or anything other than a Bury would be a lack of accuracy on the part of the artist. They did sometimes run the goods 0-4-0 engines on passenger services with the coupling rods removed so it could be intended to be one of those.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 11/08/2023 at 15:46, number6 said:

Lovely job! I assume that because the original inspiring image is an engraving that would explain the wrong line running? The plate is reversed in the print process.

Good point, it could be that.

Link to comment
On 11/08/2023 at 13:45, Camperdown said:

Fantastic work.  Maybe you could post a picture of it next to a more modern vehicle (16T mineral, say) for a size comparison?

Thank you. I would do such a comparison but my collection of wagons doesn’t include anything past  the 1870s! 

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 1
Link to comment
On 12/08/2023 at 09:27, whart57 said:

The engraver is not much cop if he makes a basic mistake like that.

I’m prepared to accept that early depictions of the railway might have been subject to some unfamiliarity by the artist! Like being aware of handed running? So in an image like that it may not have seemed important to have flipped it. See early images of giraffes or rhinos - until you’ve seen one for real hard to argue it’s incorrect! 

 

 

D1C1C804-4E75-4BB5-982C-67DA12C48D25.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
19 minutes ago, number6 said:

I’m prepared to accept that early depictions of the railway might have been subject to some unfamiliarity by the artist! Like being aware of handed running? So in an image like that it may not have seemed important to have flipped it. See early images of giraffes or rhinos - until you’ve seen one for real hard to argue it’s incorrect! 

 

 

D1C1C804-4E75-4BB5-982C-67DA12C48D25.jpeg

Love the Pinguyn… with rabies?!! 😂

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Your model is a splendid example of historical research.

 

The engraving by T.T.Bird is a reminder that newly-built railways looked more like motorways under construction than the verdant shrubberies that we see today.  Those bucolic branch lines, so beloved of modellers, did not look anything like our perception of them today!

 

In the case of Watford Tunnel, the landslip of 2016 led to the cutting being cleared of vegetation and then netted over, which restored something of the original 'bare' appearance - see https://www.can.ltd.uk/casestudies/watford-tunnel-devegetation-rockfall-netting

 

Mike

  • Like 2
Link to comment
On 11/08/2023 at 14:46, number6 said:

Lovely job! I assume that because the original inspiring image is an engraving that would explain the wrong line running? The plate is reversed in the print process.

I think it looks better reversed and doing that puts the driver on the left.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Just a thought , but was the bright idea behind the raised ends to provide a form of wind protection when running, the shelter preventing the passengers' hats being blown off? (That the feature did not become common suggests it was an idea that didn't work.)

 

The original 3rd class coaches would have given a view forward . Those with raised ends wouldn't. We take it for granted that you can only see out of the side of a railway coach. Early passengers may have had a different expectation - are we seeing some daring passengers kneeling on the seat to get a view of the approaching tunnel over the top of the end , such as passengers in the other open coaches would get anyway?

  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
7 hours ago, Ravenser said:

Just a thought , but was the bright idea behind the raised ends to provide a form of wind protection when running, the shelter preventing the passengers' hats being blown off? (That the feature did not become common suggests it was an idea that didn't work.)

 

The original 3rd class coaches would have given a view forward . Those with raised ends wouldn't. We take it for granted that you can only see out of the side of a railway coach. Early passengers may have had a different expectation - are we seeing some daring passengers kneeling on the seat to get a view of the approaching tunnel over the top of the end , such as passengers in the other open coaches would get anyway?

It’s possible. Of course it’s only a short step to putting a roof on and being able to justify the second class fare a bit more comfortably and there were plenty of carriages converted in that way. This one seems to be that odd ‘missing link’ in between.

the attached pics show the second and an unconverted third.

 

IMG_8036.jpeg

IMG_8030.jpeg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
On 11/08/2023 at 12:45, Camperdown said:

Fantastic work.  Maybe you could post a picture of it next to a more modern vehicle (16T mineral, say) for a size comparison?

 

I was happy enough until I saw the thumb!

  • Funny 1
Link to comment

Hi Chris,

I've only just read your fascinating post, hence this rather late contribution, but is it possible that the modified high ended carriage shown was in use for passenger luggage?  From my own limited experience of researching official minutes, they can more often than not be cryptically brief, stating the minimum of facts about a decision without further explanation or detail.  Based on that ambiguity, looking at the print I can that there is very little roof luggage shown on the roof of the covered carriages immediately to the rear, and while there appear to be 2 people standing against the leading partition (brakesmen/guards?), there don't appear to be any seated passengers depicted in the coach itself.  It is also washed in dark body colour, compared to the lighter unaltered 3rd class open coaches in front, which clearly show passengers in them?  While there was room under seats for small luggage, the heavy portmanteaus, trunks and hat boxes of the wealthier long distance traveller would need to be carried on the roof, and perhaps this less than satisfactory solution was being addressed by this early modification of surplus stock?  No claims for expertise here, and thanks for sharing such an interesting print and project. Matt

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...