Jump to content
 

How to not plan a model railway (part 3) - Some thoughts on Inspiration...


Keith Addenbrooke

524 views

An important point was made in the comments below my previous blog post by @AndyB that is worth highlighting before I start: thinking through ideas for a Standard Gauge layout is not the only thing I'm doing.  I'm not a quick modeller, but my workbench has some narrow gauge scratch-aid kits and scratchbuilds in progress:

 

WorkbenchPhoto1.jpg.4ae179662e0919ccedc24c5ddc85636a.jpg

 

And earlier this year I completed five different station model kits, (one in TT I began last year and four new builds in HO):

 

StationsPhoto1.jpg.4358ab5dc333fa18e473e2c34068a802.jpg

 

The advice I often pass on to others thinking about a layout is to get started modelling something, don't just wait.  As I explained in a previous blog post, it can help form or shape an approach to modelling when it comes to layout building.  So I thought it might be helpful to flag up that I do some modelling as well as having fun thinking about new projects I can start.

___________________________________________

 

Although I have plenty to be getting on with (including another dozen or more structure kits in the stash) I begin this post with a familiar planning dilemma: the concept I was keen to develop won't fit easily into my space.

 

Am I sure?  In the case of overhead electrics, there's a simple question that tests this:

 

Am I sufficiently invested in a plan to commit to building the catenary it will need?

 

Without a layout plan I was sold on, I had to admit I wasn't convinced.  This was not what I'd imagined of course - look back through the previous blog entries and just about all of them include photos of European HO models.  Similarly, images of European HO models have appeared in both my Narrow Gauge and North American project threads this year as well.

 

But it was time for another visit to the well of inspiration...I thought I'd take a step back once more and have a good think:

 

1.  What kind of layouts inspire me (British Outline)?

 

I've stated frequently that I'm as much influenced by other model railways as I am by the prototype, so it took me no time at all to draw up a list of four favourites.  All have appeared in BRM:

 

  • Hammerston Wharf (BRM Feb 2007) - a linear O scale exhibition layout by Macclesfield Model Railway Group,
  • Hudson Road (BRM Jan 2013) - a linear OO gauge exhibition layout by @Jon Grant 4472
  • Tawcombe (BRM Feb 2013) - a home layout in a loft with a linear scenic section by professional modeller David Wright,
  • Up the Line (BRM June 2015) - a linear O-16.5 Narrow Gauge exhibition layout by @KH1

 

What all four have in common (apart from superb modelling I could never hope to emulate) is that while all allow trains to pass from one end of the scene to the other (or, in the case of 'Up the Line', to transfer onwards), none are continuous runs.

 

And if I think of British Prototypes I find inspiring, and rule out the likes of Birmingham New Street (1970s) or Liverpool Lime Street (contemporary) as too big for me to tackle, then the three places that easily top my list are:

 

  • Ashburton GW (despite its operational limitations as a model railway, we used to holiday nearby)
  • Fairford GW (a particular favourite I explored for a OO gauge project in 2020)
  • Welshpool WLLR (as it is today, another holiday destination)

 

All these of course are branch terminii.   It suggests my plan for a TT:120 GW Branch Line Terminus is good, but raises the question as to how committed I really am to continuous running, when I'm happy to watch trains in other ways too?

 

Continuous running is what I grew up wanting, and still very much enjoy, but might other alternatives help me to get building now?

______________________________________

 

2.  What inspires me (European outline)?

 

Looking at European railways, my prototype knowledge outside of Narrow Gauge Lines is really limited to Railfanning videos of mainline trains, so model railways are influential here too.  Again, drawing up a list of those layouts I keep returning to is not difficult, and most are on RMweb:

 

 

Again, these have plenty of space for trains to run, but other than Obermatt all are big schemes (and even Obermatt would scale up to more space than I have in HO).  That's what I didn't consider when I bought my HO Taurus class 1016.  As I discovered when I looked at the Glacier Express in H0m last year, my European Dreams cry out for more space than I have.

______________________________________

 

3.  What about smaller layouts?

 

Are there smaller layouts that I also return to frequently, and why do I find them fascinating?  Two on RMweb are:

 

 

Both are simple linear layouts displaying wonderful modelling (and miniature engineering) in less common scales.  To me, they tap into a leisurely world in a different way.  I could list other examples of European branch lines / tramways too.

 

4.  What about something I could aspire to?  

 

One example comes straight to mind:

 

 

In  space only about 1m x 25cm, an incredible sense of spaciousness has been achieved through very careful planning by the master of small layout design.  Given this, and the amount of US HO I already have (and am keeping), why don’t I take this on board and think again about North American HO after all.  Switching layouts and shortlines (or industrial spurs) have endless possibilities for any space.

 

And if I choose the right concept and era and I could still run passenger trains after all:

 

RDCPhoto2.jpg.1048db740eee6d7efd94d85f0d5b0829.jpg

 

RDCPhoto1.jpg.991faa54d506b7a4ae4b4f7df3ee5ad1.jpg

 

We all have our own inspirations, and there are plenty more I could mention, particularly when it comes to North American modelling.  What I need to do is to see if something sparks my interest with a flame that doesn’t quickly burn out.  Modelling American HO has always been a long term aim, but my thinking was initially along the lines of a garage-sized retirement project.  I’ve had a couple of goes at getting started, but not managed to complete a project design to the point of construction.  Why not look again?

 

As I mentioned near the top of this post, I hadn't anticipated heading off in this direction, so I'll see next time where my ideas take me.  In the meantime, I do hope my ramblings here might help others not yet building a layout to think more widely about the alternatives.  Like me, there may well be things we've missed. 

 

All that remains is for me to say a big and heartfelt thank you to all those modellers whom I've referenced in this blog post.  I don't know any personally, so I hope it's OK.  Your work inspires and encourages me, and I hope it does others too.  Thank you, Keith.

 

Edited by Keith Addenbrooke

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

Off the top of  me ed, Trowland and Old Parrock, are very nicely done BLTs. Agree about Obbekaar, too.

Edited by Northroader
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Hi Keith.

Another interesting post. Thank you.

In particular for the links to layouts; I found myself watching the Furtigen layout for several minutes and thinking it would be very much your cup of tea.

 

But of course it's bigger than you have space for! 

 

The idea of a train circulating in a figure of eight is one we've talked about by DM.

 

It was at this point my memory kicked in and reminded me of a series of micro layouts you designed a while back entitled "Round and Round They Go!

 

So I'm wondering if you might adapt that circular design for the HO layout? 

Just a thought! 

Cheers for now. Andy

 

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Thanks Andy - “Round and Round they Go!” on the legendary Carl Arendt’s website does indeed mark my one possibly unique contribution to our wonderful hobby: working out you could fit a double track continuous run circuit in OO / HO onto a micro-layout baseboard using no more than 4’ sq.  (it does need 1st radius curves, but we’re going back far enough that they were still a thing!).

 

Glad you enjoyed Frutigen’s layout - as you say, the schematic does indeed mirror one you’ve also suggested.  I’m planning to take a bit of time now as I (re)consider my options, so the next blog entry may not be for a while, though I did manage to get into the garden and do a bit of baseboard painting yesterday now the sun has come out.  Thanks, Keith.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Thanks Keith, I’m pleased Kinross inspired you. I find small cameo layouts a great way to scratch an itch and enjoy the hobby. Plenty more to build, more than I have space and time for, as I’m sure is the case for many of us!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

I am glad Up the Line inspired you and just thought you might like to know that after a four year enforced retirement it is going to be at the Cardiff show 21st and 22nd September. I have quite a lot to do in the next six weeks and will hopefully manage a blog or two.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...