Jump to content
 
  • entries
    3
  • comments
    11
  • views
    1,252

How many of us feel like this..?


Sam '43003' Tanner

373 views

Morning all,

 

So, I'm blogging. Let's see how this turn out. :rolleyes:

 

As the title suggest's, I'm on the plain of indecision. I get so many idea's that I feel swamped, then I decide on one, get to the point of starting something, then change my plans again. Permit me to elaborate..

 

I have "The Mall" in the pipeline for the 2010 Challenge..

 

"The Mall"

 

Now, this has kind of stalled due to a constant lack of funding and time. I may as well just admit defeat with the project and get it off my mind.

 

On the plus side of things, with the recent 2mm release's from the likes of Dapol and the apparent ease of use with EasiTrack, 'N' gauge is definatly a route I'm considering. This plan based on a combination of St. Margarets and Rye House on the Hertford East branch is definatly one I keep looking at..

 

2mmHertfordBranch.jpg

 

The layout is 12' x 1'6" (144" x 18"), of which 7' (84") is scenic. What I'm not sure on, is where to set the layout. One thought that keeps popping up is the Cumbrian Coast, between Barrow and Sellafield, giving me the excuse to run a range of DMU Classes and a few 'Nuke' workings. Other than that, my fancy takes me to East Anglia, the South West and the South East. If anyone would fancy picking one for me, I'll gladly oblige. B)

 

Then, of course, there's my interest in Narrow Gauge, 2' gauge in particular. This is represented by 7mm stock running on 14mm gauge track, known as 0-14 or 0n2. A major supplier is KB Scale I have a spare board laying about in my room, 37" x 15" iirc, and this could form the basis for a trial in 0-14 using a simple 'fork' layout, such as the North Pole Railway This simple layout would be fun to operate. A loader at the rear would load a few hoppers with sand/gravel/coal, the loco would then drag the hoppers to the spur at front left and propel them into the siding to be tipped into a waiting truck. To break things up a bit, a line of tree's would run between the siding and rear trackwork.

An alternative is this little layout, an idea from Ian Holmes.

 

IMG00085-20100125-0257.jpg

 

The whole layout is 16" at it's widest and 10" at it's deepest. The trackplan is drawn using 0-14 templates, available from KB Scale as a .pdf file

 

So that's pretty much the extent of my toils in the hobby. Hardly nothing compared to what some modeller's seem to go through, but enough to grind on my doo-dah's!

 

If you've got this far: Congratulations! If you have any thought's or comments, as always, don't hesitate to leave something. Let me know what you think regarding which direction I should be taking.

 

ttfn,

Sam.

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

Hi Sam. "The plain of indecision" - nice way of putting it!

 

I guess we all know what you mean. I don't know about you, but in my case it helps if I give up on the idea of making the perfect, now-and-forever choice, and instead simply say "OK, I'll build that layout first, then later on I'll build the other one, and then later still I'll build the third one".

 

That way, it doesn't really matter which one you choose as the first, and it's not so terrible if it fails, because you know you'll get around to the others eventually. It also allows time to let the other layout ideas mature at the back of your mind, including possibly discarding them eventually.

 

Personally I'd go for the simplest, quickest build as the first of these layouts, just to get something running. If you're experienced in kit-building, I guess that would mean the NG layout - if not, then a simple N gauge solution maybe?

Link to comment

Start one - whichever takes your fancy... as you progress you'll end up starting the others too - it's not necessarily about finishing them in any order. I've got two on the go with a third waiting in the wings. The hardest thing is starting but once you do you wonder what the problem is!

Link to comment
Hi Sam. "The plain of indecision" - nice way of putting it!

 

I guess we all know what you mean. I don't know about you, but in my case it helps if I give up on the idea of making the perfect, now-and-forever choice, and instead simply say "OK, I'll build that layout first, then later on I'll build the other one, and then later still I'll build the third one".

 

That way, it doesn't really matter which one you choose as the first, and it's not so terrible if it fails, because you know you'll get around to the others eventually. It also allows time to let the other layout ideas mature at the back of your mind, including possibly discarding them eventually.

 

Personally I'd go for the simplest, quickest build as the first of these layouts, just to get something running. If you're experienced in kit-building, I guess that would mean the NG layout - if not, then a simple N gauge solution maybe?

 

Some sound advice. Very much appreciated Mikkel. :) I've no experience with kit-building. I'd be in a better frame of mind to try it if the loco kit's were of whitemetal or resin construction, but seeing as they're brass, I'll hold that one for now. B)

Link to comment
Start one - whichever takes your fancy... as you progress you'll end up starting the others too - it's not necessarily about finishing them in any order. I've got two on the go with a third waiting in the wings. The hardest thing is starting but once you do you wonder what the problem is!

 

So it's a case of booting myself in the backside, saying "Get on with it you tart..!", and get a move on..:lol:;)

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

A lot of us get involved in more than one project. I work in 0 gauge, 16mmNG live steam and I keep looking at my old 2mm stuff and thinking I could just........

 

It helps if the ideas spring from things you know. Admittedly my 0 gauge Cambrian is before my time but I have regularly visited the welsh coast for the last 40 years so I have some idea of the setting.

Start with something you know if you can.

DonW

Link to comment

I can fully share your dilemma , having at one point found myself actively pursuing 4 layouts (and that's ignoring the stalled light rail project , the half forgotten ambitions for Ravenser Mk2, and the bits of modern N I started acquiring)

 

But with one exception, all of them were 4mm/OO (provided you ignore the large padded envelope stuffed full of 3mm wagon kits)

 

At least there was scope for me to reuse stock originally intended for one project on another project.

 

I think the first step may be to try and sort out which scale you want to commit to. You've mentioned 3 scales above: N , 4mm, and 7mm. Once you choose one scale, you're likely to find you stick in it for most or all future projects

 

A useful second way of approaching this may be - what models/stock/materials do you already have? Using what's on hand is a cheaper and faster way of getting somewhere than starting completely from scratch in a scale, with absolutely nothing, not even a sheet of brickpaper

 

A further suggesting is do do some rigourous scoring and analysis as a way of clarifying your thoughts and choices. The Americans like to do this, and I found it very helpful when deciding what to attempt for the last challenge. Draw up a list of things you want out of a layout , and a list of constraints (cash, space, skills, trade support etc), and probably a list of other factors like stock/materials on hand . Score each possible project against each category , say on a scale of 0-3 (0= doesn't do this at all, 3= perfect fit)

 

 

Add up the scores for each project , and you should get a feel for which one is going to suit you most. If you have any other ideas you've toyed with , even if abandoned, score those too.

 

Hope this helps

Link to comment
I can fully share your dilemma , having at one point found myself actively pursuing 4 layouts (and that's ignoring the stalled light rail project , the half forgotten ambitions for Ravenser Mk2, and the bits of modern N I started acquiring)

 

But with one exception, all of them were 4mm/OO (provided you ignore the large padded envelope stuffed full of 3mm wagon kits)

 

At least there was scope for me to reuse stock originally intended for one project on another project.

 

I think the first step may be to try and sort out which scale you want to commit to. You've mentioned 3 scales above: N , 4mm, and 7mm. Once you choose one scale, you're likely to find you stick in it for most or all future projects

 

A useful second way of approaching this may be - what models/stock/materials do you already have? Using what's on hand is a cheaper and faster way of getting somewhere than starting completely from scratch in a scale, with absolutely nothing, not even a sheet of brickpaper

 

A further suggesting is do do some rigourous scoring and analysis as a way of clarifying your thoughts and choices. The Americans like to do this, and I found it very helpful when deciding what to attempt for the last challenge. Draw up a list of things you want out of a layout , and a list of constraints (cash, space, skills, trade support etc), and probably a list of other factors like stock/materials on hand . Score each possible project against each category , say on a scale of 0-3 (0= doesn't do this at all, 3= perfect fit)

 

 

Add up the scores for each project , and you should get a feel for which one is going to suit you most. If you have any other ideas you've toyed with , even if abandoned, score those too.

 

Hope this helps

 

Most useful. I like the scoring system. I'll get a-writing. :)B)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...