Jump to content
 

LNER4479

Members
  • Posts

    5,838
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by LNER4479

  1. On 09/04/2024 at 09:56, dj_crisp said:

     have a few photos in my favs of services labelled as going to Barnstaple in the 80s such as (cant share those actually on the line).

     

    Class 33 Newton Abbot 4/5/82

     

     

    Were these the Saturday summer specials?

     

    Cheers

    Will

    I clearly remember riding a train such as this to Barnstaple and back in March(-ish) 1987 with a fellow BR colleague. We were doing a mad 24 hour rail travel competition and caught the WR sleeper from Reading at midnight (Fri night) and decanted at Exeter at something like 4am (Sat morning). There was then this 4.30am service to Barnstaple, 33 + MkIs. I'm pretty certain it conveyed newspapers in the luggage compartments (off the sleeper? Or maybe a separate newspapers train from London?). It was then something like 6am back off Barnstaple as more of a bona fide passenger service back into Exeter.

    I'll have a record of the loco somewhere but not the MkI formation (sorry!).

     

    My decade of interest is the 1950s and the 'classic' 3-coach ordinary passenger formation (branchline or otherwise) was BSK-CK-BSK, as others have stated. In fact, pre-1956, more accurately stated as BTK-CK-BTK. Typical 4-coach would be BSK-SK-CK-BSK.

    I would agree that use of MkIs on such services in the 1950s would be highly unusual; however, add MkI BCK through coach to add interest, ie BCK / BSK-CK-BSK. You need a lot of brake coaches when modelling the 1950s!

     

    Finally (for now - and as it's a modelling forum) my 'Festival of Britain' MkI 'Royal Scot' set that we run on Shap. It's slightly reduced formation (11 vs 13) but otherwise correct, including the full kitchen and the RTO vehicle (Comet sides on Lima donors). Rest are bog standard Bachmann.

     

    image.jpg.7f8abde521932d27195ce075968a6d3f.jpg

     

    Love MkIs!

    • Like 5
  2. 14 hours ago, Dominion said:

    I notice you mentioned earlier you planned to have the ability to run DC for Mark’s unchipped locos.

     

    I mention this as in normal DC or DCC wiring you would not have to insulate outer rails of fans, and I missed it when first laying my storage loops. It may be too late as it looks like you have laid several of those turnouts already but may still be easier to do sooner rather than later. 

     

     

    7 hours ago, gr.king said:

    Is the actual objection on account of the fact that any areas wired with consideration for DCC operation only will (or may) have "everything live, all the time", and therefore no places in which a (DCC fitted, or other) loco operable on DC will be able to stand "dead" when a DC power supply is being used?

    All very much in the forefront of our minds at the present time!

     

    Firstly, I've been putting double insulators in everywhere with the idea that only the train you want to drive will be live. An overriding factor is that the loops being laid will eventually be hidden from view (either partially or totally) so there needs to be a certain amount of automation in terms of stopping and starting trains.

     

    Whilst we'll have DCC to drive the trains, we won't be using it to change points, etc. That'll be conventional electrics, push buttons, relays, etc - we're as one with that. Just a preference, but one I'm comfortable with in terms of being within my competence.

     

    Each (of the four) circuits will be a 'district' and switchable between DCC and DC. There are many locos(!) and it will be a long process to chip them all. In fact, there's probably some kit built ones that will never get chipped!

    • Like 5
    • Agree 1
  3. 13 hours ago, AndyB said:

    Where you've got baseboards supported by kitchen units I'd recommend seeking ways to reinforce these.

     

     

    11 hours ago, gr.king said:

    I would be concerned on that score too. Not a fan of chipboard for anything structural.  I also don't trust softwood rails for baseboard framing - it is not inherently stable, if it wants to warp, it will, and you don't normally get the opportunity to choose thoroughly seasoned, knot-free, straight grained wood from the optimum part of the tree.

    Thanks for comments / concerns.

     

    FWIW

     

    The room is an inside room, ie no wall is an outside wall. So it's inherently dry and pretty constant temperature in there.

     

    Layout is only partly supported by the units; rest is conventional legs (3 x 1) as you can see. These areas are designed so as to be able to store the plastic boxes beneath, as you describe

     

    Lengthways, longitudinal beams are also 3 x 1. Bought in a pack of 4 from a well-known DIY store, of orange hue (other DIY stores are available). Yesterday, I opened a new pack (itself chosen from others in the rack as being the best I could see) and selected the two straightest and truest to be the longitudinal beams. They were dead straight and true to my eye. They'd also been in the room for a month and thus had time to adjust to the climate.

     

    I do use 9mm ply for similar beams on my exhibition layouts, where weight is a consideration. These (Doncaster) boards are designed to be removable if required which is also influencing the method of construction.

     

    I'll keep my eye on things but no concerns so far (although I do understand that some of the effects you describe are of a more longer term nature).

     

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  4. 33 minutes ago, philip-griffiths said:

    If you are operating points by hand, do I assume correctly that you are not powering the crossing separately, and are relying therefore upon the switch blades providing the power supply to the crossing?   Or is there a separate relay which you are firing at the same time as moving the point blades? 

     

    Regards

    Yes, it's relying on switchblade contact.

     

    I know there's the Taliban out there for whom that is anathema; but it's not a red line for me for a simple set of dead end sidings.

     

    I do have 'red lines' on other things, mind ...

    • Like 5
    • Agree 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. Latest report is a combination of two visits - the first was curtailed due to a ... er ... industrial injury 🤕 

     

    PXL_20240326_150830945.jpg.40673077f341a67a51484c47f5434368.jpg

    Anyhow, here's work on the last ladder of points in the fiddle yard, the Up entrance points, seen here temporarily laid out top left.

     

    PXL_20240411_192315642.jpg.2fde99f52a91854c868aa765cbded15e.jpg

    And now laid out for keeps, with the down exit line being installed beneath.

     

    PXL_20240411_125050738.jpg.c7dc3ec2418e0e3712db160de86f3af3.jpg

    Meanwhile, down at the other end of the room, further baseboard construction.

     

    PXL_20240411_172900989.jpg.c51a1423b58da055524521e971e48c2d.jpg

    And thus we have the final board in place for Doncaster station itself 🙂 It's quite a long way down to the other end.

     

    PXL_20240411_192330074.jpg.96613e188a82b4c441758b5c9ccfd85e.jpg

    With this progress, we're within an ace of starting to lay track in the scenic area. So this stretch of cork has been painted, in preparation. This is the south end junctions board.

     

    Next visit, hopefully 🤓

     

     

    • Like 11
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  6. Yes, another jolly day in BarryO's model railway room.

     

    PXL_20240409_164849414.jpg.0bf822dcade37869bd4f2c84d7a501f2.jpg

    Shock! Horror! Diseasels!!

    We did nonetheless identify this corner, alongside the approach tracks of the main station, as a potential site for diesel stabling sidings, maybe even a small depot? The sort of thing the ER was rather better at doing than the LMR (the latter all too often trying to adapt existing steam facilities rather than purpose building something new)

     

    Anyhow, here is the result of a day reaching over, drilling square holes etc. Room for up to ten of the things, more if shunting locos are let loose. I'm sure it'll be bulging at the seams before long🤨

     

    PXL_20240409_164127136.jpg.f32ce71c6f3e0b543f6c08683021f62b.jpg

    Whilst I had the camera out, went for a roam round the rest of the layout. Goods sidings full of trains. The NCB exchange sidings and colliery branch (RHS) is the next (last?) task.

     

    PXL_20240409_164104490.jpg.eeda9e9b78979ee038eaa4e1ba1b662f.jpg

    Loco depot full of proper engines. Some of them even moved when threatened with a controller.

     

    PXL_20240409_164312706.jpg.1663aa7db041a85bf78afe8e2a984d06.jpg

    And the main station, now looking rather good with platforms.

     

    PXL_20240409_164703774.jpg.1c254db72d6c36d7dc6011baf85a1df9.jpg

    And looking the other way, towards the goods depot.

     

    A very pleasant day; thanks to my host for supplies of tea, bacon sandwiches and evening meal prior to my departure 🤗

     

    • Like 10
    • Thanks 1
    • Round of applause 5
  7. 4 hours ago, Mallard60022 said:

    Just down the Road from you so no Postage charges.

    Doubt they will go for much as Traders don't like Coach Kits....too niche.

     

    http://www.vectis.co.uk/d039-lot-990376-comet-models-oo-group-of-coach-kits?display=grid&el=990376&header_id=0&keyword=&lo=ASC&pn=1&pp=96

     

    All the best

    Philth

    Good grief - that really is someone's kit mountain (looking thru adjacent lots as well). Trying to be 'good' here so that mine isn't too tall, come the day ...

     

    Thanks for highlighting.

    • Like 2
    • Friendly/supportive 3
  8. 3 hours ago, coronach said:

    From what I know, crabs were rarely seen on the Waverley, but I do have a video somewhere of one stopping for a blow up half way up the climb at Steel Road. 

     

    Hi 60093(!) Great to see you back up and at 'em in the loft 😃 All the best for your continued recovery; can't have been an easy last 12 months for you.

     

    Funnily enough, I was watching a Waverley route video just the other day and that featured a Crab, allegedly stopping for a blow-up at Shankend, on the southbound climb to Whitrope. Either a case of mistaken identity ... or that's at least two recorded instances? Like you, I hadn't previously associated the class with the route; however, one suspects in the general 1960s rundown under the LMR, anything went.

    • Like 1
  9. 3 hours ago, Oldddudders said:

    And that fits perfectly with something I have quoted before. Circa 1990, the man from Dupont was making his first visit to BRB. He walked into the Chairman's office with the words "Good morning Chairman - how many staff have you killed today?" Culture change did come about. If the pendulum seemed to sometimes swing too far, well that was to be expected. 

    I came across the attached some years ago and keep a careful hold of it. A reminder of how far we've come ... and to question by return the all too common 'elf n safety gorn mad' accusation.

    In the research for Grantham (trying to maintain some relevance!), I came across interesting snippet that, back in the day, the ground floor of the water tower opposite Grantham main station was designated as the local railway morgue ...

    Railway Safety Report 1972.pdf

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 5
  10. 1 hour ago, Fishplate said:

    Hi Graham @LNER4479. Stopped by a few times on the Sunday. Each time I called by you were either very busy inside, at the loco shed panel, or sorting out errant road vehicles, so didn't like to interrupt you.

    Aargh - sorry to have missed you 😔 It’s very easy to ‘zone out’ in the middle of a show - priority is always on trying to put on a good show and keep things moving … a constant challenge on a layout like Grantham.

     

    Glad you enjoyed your visit nonetheless and hope to catch up on a future occasion😉 Thanks for the photo.

    • Like 6
  11. And a perfect cue for some pix of mine ...

     

    PXL_20240329_113530372.jpg.10d237723ccb90863303b3a423e220e5.jpg

    Here it is all in the back of the van.

     

    PXL_20240329_113556569.jpg.1484519817cb8040fc4fe5b5d9554d07.jpg

    Backed up for unloading.

     

    PXL_20240329_121736099.jpg.5ff5293dde5f98a13347f8a79fe4e4f2.jpg

    This is how close we were to the unloading point. Those familiar with the venue will know where we are.

     

    PXL_20240329_124744903.jpg.f715178828290c64d8c18615af6df2ce.jpg

    Set up proceeds steadily.

    • Like 16
  12. 9 hours ago, St Enodoc said:

    I rather like that squashed-in railcar.

    Now you really shouldn't go around saying things like that; it only prompts me to post even more photos ...

     

    PXL_20240320_103803389.jpg.a0bfcc1dea313252a18cf9f0874e32b4.jpg

    Here's a slightly more three-quarter view of the thing. They are not without their charm, although the older, more rounded examples are more aesthetically pleasing.

     

    One of these days, we'll configure a trip so as to have at least an overnight in Nordhausen, where the HSB rails form one tentacle of the town's tram system. Have done it once before but it's over 10 years ago now. Only one steam working being the main disincentive!

     

    • Like 11
  13. 17 minutes ago, DaveF said:

    I hope you won't mind a link to my old photos of the HSB (when it was still part of DR)

     

    If anyone wants to see it as it was over 30 years ago some of the photos I took in 1991 and 1992 are on flickr in an album at at:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidwf2009/albums/72157630495850084/with/7535447786

    No problem at all - fascinating to see the railway in the immediate post-DR era.

     

    Clearly today's HSB is much modernised, well-polished etc. But I stick to my guns in saying that it's a working railway, not a preserved one. I can only experience this version of 'real' steam as it is in the 21st Century. Envious of anyone who was able to visit the railway in more workaday times.

    • Like 7
    • Agree 1
  14. 15 minutes ago, PaulRhB said:

    Nice to see the original in fine fettle, when we were last there the heritage train came up the Brocken with one of the later build and our service train had 222 on the front. I was delighted 😁 

     

    Yes, 222 seems to get used turn and turn about with the others. We saw it a lot on this visit. I've seen it in the past on the TraditionZug.

     

    According to previous news item, the green Mallett is due back for the summer but not sure whether they'll be using that on its own, unless a reduced formation?

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 3
  15. Ooh - nearly forgot. A bit of video:

     

     

    Our train back down the Brocken on the Monday was slightly late (shock horror!). This delayed our entry into the passing siding and so the uphill train was caught at the signal. Here it is doing an impressive re-start on the 1-in-30. In truth, loco well within itself with the standard winter formation of 7 carriages (8 in summer) and light passenger loading, not to mention dry rail. Still impressive enough though?

    • Like 11
    • Round of applause 1
×
×
  • Create New...