Jump to content
 

Tavy Man

Members
  • Posts

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tavy Man

  1. The loose brake composites were built to diagram 2406. Some of these vehicles survived until September 1968 in BR maroon. The brake composites which ran with semi open brake thirds for the West of England route were built to diagram 2405. These sets stayed together until the end of steam working on the Waterloo - Exeter route in 1964. Regards
  2. Apologies but I haven't any photo's to hand but look up Wadebridge. This station had a 4 arm structure for Up trains each platform had access to the North Cornwall line or the line to Bodmin North. Regards
  3. It's all your fault really. During the period in ones life when women and such like get in the way, I picked up a magazine, BRILL I think it was, when you reviewed and constructed a then new Crownline Merchant Navy. My leaning towards all things Southern gave me the encouragement to pick up a soldering iron and have a go. I still wince at some of my early attempts but gradually improved thanks to your magazine articles and DVD's. Geoff Holts books on locomotive construction were also a great help when I moved to 7mm scale, as well as joining the Guild. I moved up a scale for no better reason then it's easier to work with. The coach is a modified CRT kit of a Bullied brake composite which is nearing completion. The M7 comes from the Martin Finney stable. I'm writing this from my hospital bed as I'm recovering from a minor stroke so can I humbly ask you to continue this thread for as long as you feel able. Reading all the good things people are doing and the good advice contributor's give is the best medicine one can take. Regards
  4. Tony I wish mine would resemble a work bench occassionally, but I fear no modelling would be done.. Regards
  5. I have not heard Laira referred to as the "last outpost of Diesel civilisation" before, but I do recall it by the nickname of the "Bermuda Triangle" for reasons that escape me.... Regards
  6. Divided trains use to fall under regulation 20 of the old working of trains on double lines by the absolute block system.If a Signalman decided that bringing the front portion of a divided train to a stand would risk collision, he could signal the driver to carry on by waving a green hand signal slowly from side to side. This would obviously only apply to a partially or unfitted freight as both portions of a full fitted head would both be brought to a stand fairly sharpish. Regards
  7. Yes I remember being called out one night to attend a serious failure near Parsons Tunnel which resulted in an emergency evacuation to get the passengers off the stricken Voyager onto a HST which was stopped alongside. The Voyager was rescued by a 37 which was crewed by a Plymouth Driver who still signed them. We were both competent with the adaptor coupling but it was no easy task in those conditions. Regards
  8. The Virgin 57/3's were crewed by Plymouth Cross Country Drivers who were trained on them for this purpose. Advanced warning of bad weather would result in a Driver bringing one down from Birmingham to be stabled at Exeter or Newton Abbot depending on what needed assistance first. This all came to an end in November 2008 when Virgin lost the Cross Country franchise. 57 knowledge was subsequently allowed to lapse. Regards
  9. Absolutely and always a friendly wave in my driving days. I hope the people who were working there have been looked after. Regards
  10. Yes I can confirm that. The Bromsgrove Re-Signalling scheme extends from Ashchurch to Five Ways Birmingham and is now under the control of the West Midlands Signalling Centre. This involves full re-signalling between Aschurch and Barnt Green, Relock and control from Barnt Green to Kings Norton, and re-signalling between Kings Norton and Five Ways. All of this is now controlled from the new Bromsgrove Workstation in WMSC. In fact the regional boundary has also moved to Northway Crossing which is just north of Ashchurch. In short what we have today is going to remain for an awfully long time. In the early days of the Project the passenger TOC's were pushing hard for bi-directional running on the Lickey but unfortunately there was not enough money to finance it. I should also add that Oddingley Gate Box also closed as part of this Project and has been replaced by barriers. Regards
  11. Spot on. That's the problem we are now faced with. Unfortunately the Bromsgrove station Project, Bromsgrove re-signalling, and electrification were managed as three separate projects. The result is a fit for purpose station, new signalling, but inadequate OLE provision. Apart from the non provision of OLE for platform 1 at Bromsgrove, the former Goods only line from Barnt Green to Longbridge has been upgraded to passenger status as part of the scheme, but there is no money to electrify it. Another bottle neck which could and should of been dealt with. Regards
  12. Mike BA9261 Up Gloucester down direction and BA7623 Up Bromsgrove Loop are both fixed reds with a position light. The only route from these two signals is to the Up Bromsgrove Neck ( Banker siding ). There is no main to main crossover trailing or facing at the south end of the layout. There are main to main trailing and facing crossovers at the north end of the layout but there is no signalled route to the Down Gloucester from either of the two Up Platforms 1 or 2. BA3614 Up Gloucester and BA7612 Up Bromsgrove Loop are both straight post four aspect signals. Regards
  13. My friend I don't wish to upset you or anyone else. I am simply trying to tell you that your post regarding letters to Network Rail regarding platforms 3 and 4 is incorrect. We have made our position clear through the Network change process ( probably the letter you have seen ) but this refers to the failure to wire platform 1. This means all northbound trains Including XC services would have to use platform 1 if the preferred Cross City platform is not available. We have also made the point that the failure to deliver a main to main facing crossover at the south of the layout means that northbound trains can't turn back from Bromsgrove should there be a blockage on the Lickey. Apologies if I'm not making this clear. Regards
  14. I will say it again. The Bromsgrove Station Loop line IS platform 3 with a speed of 40mph entering and departing the platform. It is NOT the main southbound route. The fast line is the Down Gloucester line platform 4 with a speed of 90mph. Platform 2 is the Up Gloucester with a speed of 90mph. Platform 1 is the Up Bromsgrove Loop with a speed of 30mph. The process for observations, complaints, or compensation payments is a process known as Network Change which Network Rail are mandated to do as part of any infrastructure change which affects all TOC's and FOC's. Our observations concerned the failure to wire platform 1 as I indicated earlier. We also have issues about the omission of a facing main to main crossover at the south end of the station and some other minor performance issues. The station layout has always been the one I have described above and has not changed since the start of the Project. The main objections to this project were the FOC's who are not happy with the new bank engine arrangements which now involve GSMR and not the plungers, and of course the lack of paths now available to them because of the enhanced Cross City service. Regards
  15. Why on earth would WE send letters to Network Rail complaining about being unable to use the "Through Line" as you describe it when the through route is platform 4.....
  16. Platform 4 at Bromsgrove is not a loop line it is known as the Down Gloucester with a line speed of 90mph. Platform 3 is known as the Down Bromsgrove Station Loop with a maximum speed of 40mph and will be the preferred Cross City platform. Cross Country have not sent letters of concern to Network Rail regarding the station layout. The only concern is the lack of OLE on platform 1 the Up Bromsgrove Loop. As only platforms 2 and 3 are being wired, if anything prevents Cross City services using platform 3 then platform 2 the Up Gloucester is the only alternative. This means fast trains will have to use platform 1 with the subsequent delay of the 30mph restriction. However, it is still hoped that sense will prevail and platform 1 will be wired as well. Regards
  17. I was there from 1981 to 1983 Garry. By that time the 02.38 Ellsmere Port was tripped to City Basin from Riverside in two parts by the trip pilot. The train engines came off at Riverside. Although I have known the trip workings to be 31 hauled if for some reason a pilot wasn't available. Regards
  18. I will look out for you. The chair is having a week off next week. We resume the following Thursday. Regards
  19. That's interesting. Looking at the following 31's which passed City Basin Box in May 1983 when I was on duty, there are a few foreign ones. 31117/31285/31231/31210/31156/31216/31139/31170/31228/31304/31149/31128/31151/31325/31296/31121/31187/31161. 31260/31195. Regards
  20. I will make sure i do. Which building are you in, the old post office or Davison House. We meet in both as I'm on the Oxford Project as well. Regards
  21. Captain No need to worry. Despite their attempts the double track layout is staying as it is at present. Phase 2 SSC has just got underway with 2019/20 the target. The red lines that i am sure you remember from the VFM meetings are very much still our red lines. Regards
  22. These sort of photographs say it all for me. 36 years later and we've gone from a 5 coach local offering 1st and 2nd class accommodation and plenty of luggage and cycle space, to a 143 or a 150 if you are lucky. Ah well that's what they call progress isn't it...... Regards
  23. The 31 in the photo has been used to return the train to Newton Abbot from Teigngrace, where it was stabled. The "pretty" train engine would of been on the other end. Top and tail operation was always used on these workings as there was no run round facilities at Teigngrace. 31's were quite common working out of Exeter in the 1970/80's with at least 3 or 4 stabled at Exeter on most days. regular workings were the daily Barnstaple Goods, the Heathfield trip working, and local stopping trains to Paignton & Barnstaple. They also were booked to work the 02.56 Taunton to Paignton Newspaper train, the 06.15 Plymouth to Old Oak Common Empty Newspaper train and the 05.20 Paddington to Plymouth parcel train in the week as well as the workings already mentioned. I must admit to having a soft spot for the 31's as they were ideal on these workings. They didn't like the South Devon banks though. I booked on spare at Exeter one day and was asked to work the 07.30 Paddington down to Plymouth as Old Oak had nothing better than a 31/4 to work the train and Laira men didn't know them. With 10 coaches on the speedo was barely at 10mph going over the top. Happy days... Please keep posting these lovely photographs. Marvellous stuff. Regards
  24. Hi The first photo was I believe taken at Highbridge GWR station. You can see the ex S&D line crossing on the level ahead of the DMU. Lovely shots I must say. Many thanks
×
×
  • Create New...