Jump to content
 

37Oban

Members
  • Posts

    604
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 37Oban

  1. Hi, railway companies built buffer stops with only vertical posts, sunk into the ground, or with forward facing supports, for situations just like yours. Roja
  2. 37Oban

    Little Muddle

    More like the old wire coathangers at the back of the wardrobe! Leave one in a shed, out of sight, and the next thing you know...! Roja
  3. Hi Darius, I've just bought the DC Kits version of this from Ebay, for what I consider a good price! Like Clive. I live in Lincolnshire, although the northern part, and these were my local dmu's so, although not relevant for the areas I model I wanted one for sentimental reasons! A 114 was the only dmu I managed to snag a cab ride in way back in 1976! The kit comes with a Black Beetle power bogie which I'll put back on Ebay as I model in EM and, unless I can find a suitable power chassis in my boxed stash, I'll use you method to build one. Looking forwards to seeing this build with great interest! Roja
  4. Hi, when I've built Metcalfe, or any card kit, I've made my own weathering powders from pastels, used them then fixed with an ultraviolet resistant artists fixative. Much better than varnish as it prevents the building fading over time in sunlight. Worth the extra cost! Roja
  5. Hi, there's a Silver Cod pub in Newington, Hull. Roja
  6. 37Oban

    Little Muddle

    Hi, there could be more truth than poetry in that! It could a farrowing pen where a pregnant sow would be confined behind bars so the piglets could get away from her to prevent being crushed when she moved. Roja
  7. Hi, take a look at Peterhead! No loco release roads for both passenger and freight trains! Roja
  8. Hi, I'm looking fowards to seeing this develop. I have long thought that the docks of Hull would make a great choice for a model. I have several books on the railways, and docks, of Hull, which, unfortunately, are in storage pending an eventual move! Maybe, one day, I'll get chance to build one but at the moment I'm busy doing work on three, yes, three, layouts: St Mungos, an EM terminus based in Glasgow; Poppy Hill, an EM layout using 2 Scalescenes box file kits and Whitfield, an OO roundy roundy and all while house-hunting! Phew! Roja
  9. Hi, this is one of those dilemmas that everyone will have their own ideas on but you are the one to make the decision! For my two penn'orth, unless it can be easily seen for most viewing angles, I'd go with only one pit, and that being the outside one. However, as I've said, it's up to you to go through the pro's and con's of each idea and then decide. Roja
  10. Hi, operators not taking the time to complete the coupling and brake test operations is one of my bugbears when watching a layout at an exhibition. Once maybe operator error but two? That's when I walk away no matter how high the standard the rest of the layout. Bit like spoiling the shop for a hap'worth of tar! Roja
  11. Hi, I agree. Also needs some subtle weathering and I would also paint the footpath kerb, the ones I've seen are always a different colour to the path and road being made from a type of concrete. Roja
  12. For us of a certain age I think it should be Sage! Roja
  13. I agree. The top of the clump will be fairly well covered in leaves but the underneath just an open mess of stems. I'd add a wee bit more foliage, and some changes in the tones of green. Bramble foliage turns slightly paler, or darker, depending on the species, then gets patches of different shades of brown and beige the later in the year towards autumn. Depending on how late in spring your model is set maybe a few white flowers would help too. Roja
  14. And brambles! Lots of brambles! And nettles! Did I mention brambles? Roja
  15. Experts! Best definition I know of an expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing at all! Roja
  16. You've got to have Tunnock's and Irn Bru delivery vans somewhere on the layout! Roja
  17. I wholeheartedly agree with this! I seriously think that the model designers never actuctually "look" at the real thing to see what it actually visible! Even enlarged photographs of rolling sock doesn't show all the pipes and undergubbins that they insist on adding unless said vehicle is upside down following an accident! I feel that, for some modellers, it's a case of bragging rights! I know this view will offend some, but that's what I think! If you can't see it on the prototype from the lineside if the train is stood, let alone passing when you're stood on a platform, then what is the point? Surely what is more important is how close the external visible appearance of he model is is to prototype and how well it runs! We run steam locomotives and diesels with electric motors so why don't people complain about that? Imagine, a steam powered 4mm black 5 with working brakes, or a Cl37 with diesel engine, generator, traction motor to each axle,train heating and brakes coupled to a rake of mk1 coaches with wqrking brakes and steam heating! Then imagine the cost! If people want all the bells and whistles then fair enough, but, and it's a big but, what about all of us who just want a model that looks good and runs well at a reasonable price? I model EM, but most of my stock is used, kit or scratchbuilt. It looks good but lacks all the underside details because my philosphy is if I can't see it when on the layout why bother with it! Roja
  18. 37Oban

    Camden Shed

    Hi, I've built all sorts of turnout formations in both N an EM, including, in N, curved single slips and curved 3-way with a minimum radius of 8 inches! Unfortunately I don't have any photos of these. I enjoy building turnouts, but the have to be accurate to work well, and you have to be happy with their appearance or they'll annoy you to the point of madness! The curved 3-way took, I think, 6 attempts, before I was happy with it. I recently built a double slip in EM, which works okay, but I have a couple of niggles about it's appearance so, when I get the time, I'll either rebuild part of it, or maybe in it's entirety. I thing I do is only use copperclad sleepers in the critical areas of the turnout, such as support for the crossing nose and associated wing rails, and 4, sometimes 5, timbers to which the blades are soldered and 1, maybe 2, either side of the tie bar and 1 at the end of each road to assist keeping gauge and when laying with other track. The rest of the timbers are wood strip. As a rule, unless it's one of the critical areas, I only use 1 copperclad sleep in every 3 or 4 to maintain gauge. Also, I've never been too concerned about the thickness of the copperclad. A thin shim of card or plasticard under the timbers in question can be inserted when the turnout is laid, and/or during construction, and this subterfuge is easily hidden when ballasted. I have bought copperclad of a nominal thickness which was actually thinner, but worked around it as suggested. After all, like everything else, copperclad is now an expensive commodity, so I try to waste as little as possible during construction. Roja
  19. Depends on the time of year. From mid summer to late autumn bramble fruits will range from a pale white-ish green through to glossy black with a hint of purple whilst raspberries range from the same pale colour to a nice pinkish red. Apart from that, in 7mm, there's not much difference in the appearance of the plants. Roja
  20. Mm, brambles! Being Glenfinnan, maybe there should be some wild raspberries in the mix! Roja
  21. Is it me or is that kink near the turnout getting worse? I know it would be a PITA to fix but it would be well worth it both for appearance and running. Roja
  22. Well, that's an interesting article! I may have research further the use of a K1 chassis with some A4 parts! That's going to be sometime in the future, though, and, as ever, dependant on funds! Still.... Roja
  23. Modellers Law strikes again! I've just opened my download copy of Railway Modeller and guess what's in it? Gresley K4 described! 😂 Roja
×
×
  • Create New...