Jump to content
 

Siphon208

Members
  • Posts

    149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Siphon208

  1. HI, 

    Is there any one of the scratch building aces on here, that could help with this, please? I am looking to get these buildings done, as party of my proposed layout. At the moment, I only have a few photos, of the main station building and ticket office, and the footprint of the building. I have no indication of height. what is the best way of scratch-building the station house/ticket office? I believe everything was demolished, late 70's- early 80's.

     

    Any advice at all, would be great

     

    Dene

  2. Dear All

    I  could do with some advice on signalling this layout, once complete- It has a yard area, and a coal siding that locos reverse in to? its an end-to-end layout. If any one can help, please? Period is late 60'sto early 70;s Western Region

    Thanks, 

    Dene

     

    202379304_CranSignal.jpg.d3757e602b2ec63a9b8372e70781aa55.jpg

  3. Hi All

    Have any of our local experts on this CLC station, have any information on the layout? I got an old drawing from the “Disused Stations” website, but it’s not very clear. The little bay at the end of the down platform seems a little peculiar, as does the banking at the back of platform, and the heads hunt at the entrance to the goods yard? Any information gratefully received! 

    Saughall Plan.gif

  4. On 27/04/2020 at 01:40, Harlequin said:

    Hi Dene,

    Please draw your new plan to scale using accurate symbols for the turnouts so you can see what will, and will not, fit.

    My feeling is you’re going to have to drastically simplify the track plan and change the balance of scenic to fiddle yard length.

    You also have a really fundamental problem because your double track through station has, apparently, a single track connection to a single fiddle yard at one end.

     

    Have posted a revised plan below

     

  5. On 24/04/2020 at 15:43, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

    'The way' is not to think about 'siting' feeds as was the common practise with DC wiring where there had to also be planning for switched isolating sections: instead you run a pair of bus wires from the DCC system the length of the layout, and connect every single track piece with short soldered on connections or 'droppers' so the track is all live at all times, and there is no dependence on railjoiners for conduction.

     

    Suggestion for your track plan: could it be fitted within the space you have available on a very slight curve? Visually that is typically more  interesting, and Streamline points can be slightly curved to conform to a slight curve for a nicely flowing look.

    Done!

     

    • Like 1
  6. On 24/04/2020 at 15:43, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

    'The way' is not to think about 'siting' feeds as was the common practise with DC wiring where there had to also be planning for switched isolating sections: instead you run a pair of bus wires from the DCC system the length of the layout, and connect every single track piece with short soldered on connections or 'droppers' so the track is all live at all times, and there is no dependence on railjoiners for conduction.

     

    Suggestion for your track plan: could it be fitted within the space you have available on a very slight curve? Visually that is typically more  interesting, and Streamline points can be slightly curved to conform to a slight curve for a nicely flowing look.

    1512633568_CrantockAerial.JPG.b628bf2766737a156a9a06b02cfdebc3.JPG

    • Like 1
  7. On 24/04/2020 at 15:43, 34theletterbetweenB&D said:

    'The way' is not to think about 'siting' feeds as was the common practise with DC wiring where there had to also be planning for switched isolating sections: instead you run a pair of bus wires from the DCC system the length of the layout, and connect every single track piece with short soldered on connections or 'droppers' so the track is all live at all times, and there is no dependence on railjoiners for conduction.

     

    Suggestion for your track plan: could it be fitted within the space you have available on a very slight curve? Visually that is typically more  interesting, and Streamline points can be slightly curved to conform to a slight curve for a nicely flowing look.

     

  8. Thanks David- what is shown is the scribble sheet, the drawing was added to, at intervals to envisage what may have been there. As with a lot of "period" layouts, I do intend to use some leeway with what locos are run-  The layout is sated 1968-75. It is not intended as an exhibition layout, but I will keep it well within scope. Someone has suggested a slightly curved approach to the layout, and I am going to visit this idea, to see what the result is. The red bits I added to indicate what had been stripped out- they wont be going back in. I don't intend using Setrack points, as I don't like them, and for sidings, I won't be going smaller than medium radius. This is intended as a garage layout, and I have a running length of  around 14 feet available, if needed.

     

    Thanks for your help, I'll get back to the drawing board!

     

    Dene

  9. I'd like a bit of help with this, too if possible

    If a Class 52 was taking freight from Exeter to Penzance, what would be the likely headcode, if the train was restricted to 45 mph?

     

    I'm looking to modify one for my layout/

     

    Many thanks, 

     

    Dene

  10. Afternoon all!

     

    Just wondered whether anyone could help with this project?

    Its planned to be a fictional junction on a branch of BR (W) a few years after the Beeching Cuts- I have called it Crantock Tor, and it provided a junction between Penzance, Redruth and Helston. The period is 68-75. I intend to have one main running line, plus one truncated, a small factory siding next to the main platform, and a small coal siding on the other side of the abandoned island platform. I wish to run the locos DCC if possible, but I'm not confident about doing it with the track. I would like help with siting the feeds, if possible. It is an end- to end layout, with a simple run-round at one end (just past the signal bow, for 16T coal hoppers from the yard), and traffic from the  factory siding. I'll probably run 24's and 25's on it, maybe some "guest" locos, depending on factory needs!

     

    Many Thanks, 

     

    Dene1097436031_CrantockTrackplan.JPG.bab442b0cae6d93fc1093206ab23d53c.JPG

     

  11. Morning all!

    just wondered whether any of our local experts could help with this? I’ve been looking at the buildings that were on this station, such a shame that it had all gone by the 80’s- I had asked a contributor to a website about a branch that ran in to BNFL (as was). My late father had mentioned sidings, but I’d never seen them and a signal box. Apparently the signal box and sidings went in ‘69? Can anyone shed some light on this, please??

  12. Hi

    I was travelling towards Bromley Cross on Friday afternoon, when I noticed this- just north of Bolton Station, a viaduct curving away to the left, that was very overgrown, and fenced off. Would this be part of the Darcy Lever section? Apologies, I don't know this area very well, Greater Manchester must have loads of these disused viaducts!- I remember seeing one a few times, in the "Life on Mars" series- didn't manage to locate that one either!

     

    Any help from people with knowledge on that area, gratefully received!

     

    Dean

  13. Thanks for posting- great picture (hadn't seen this one before!)

    The photo I had was of a black 5 in that very same siding- backed up in the dispatch siding. Was taken about '65. The loco has the diagonal white stripe on the cab, and Overhead cables warning tags on the cab and boiler

  14. On 21/04/2019 at 09:50, BrushVeteran said:

    I recall seeing 40106 in blue undercoat and then a decision was made to use green as the topcoat to mark the last classified overhaul of the type.

    Regarding D838 being outshopped in maroon FYE after D864, the reason was D838 was awaiting bogies and final drive components but the shell had been painted long before that as part of an unclassified repair. I know someone who worked at Swindon Works at that time and he mentioned that it was sometimes difficult to ascertain what was having what done due to the constant component swapping on diesel hydraulics to keep them running in the numbers required.

    40106 came through my local station, Hooton, several times- I always thought it Odd that she carried Tops on all 4 sides, and was still in BR Green, with the late pattern BR badge still on- Here she is on ballast duties-

    95C95849-ACB0-4DC8-844B-E924AA3FA61F.jpeg

×
×
  • Create New...