Jump to content
 

RMW "Layout & Track Design" - all change............


halsey
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

Hi there

 

We are back home again for another winter thankfully without as much going on as last year which didn't see much progress on the layout

 

I've just completed my first (and only) white metal kit - langley models wharf crane - nothing wrong with the kit at all but way too fiddly for my eyesight and hands!

 

Reasonably happy with the result though this may not be the final position but it is so fragile I wanted to see it "fitted" 

 

This winter I intend to have a real go at weathering (not airbrushing) ...……...already bought various kit and some cheap <£2 wagons to play with. 

 

For those of you who have shown an interest in my boating activity - we had a great summer (500+ locks in 6 months) and even changed boats on impulse in late August (the front of "Zulu" is my new profile picture)

 

BFN

post-27634-0-60222100-1538999355_thumb.jpg

post-27634-0-60222100-1538999355_thumb.jpg

Edited by halsey
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • RMweb Gold

I think this achieves the consensus we've arrived at ..

 

attachicon.gifHalsey2.jpg

 

It's now 5 sections, with additional belt and braces feeds in a couple of places - the two shown next to one another on the branch should be immediately after the junction and immediately before the station throat  So you need 5 double-pole double-throw centre-off switches.  Isolating rail joiners needed on both rails wherever the colour changes.  The only differences between this and David's last plan are that (1) he also split the goods yard into 2 sections - I haven't and (2) I've not risked wiring direct to the double slip, but put two feeds to the right of it.

 

Good luck

 

Chris

 

I think it a credit to all concerned that only today have I found the need to alter this - and all I have done is provided an additional feed to area 3 (the branch station upper layer) and this is simply to allow it to be operated when the bridge is up - so well done all - 3 years later it still stands up - where did the time go!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • halsey changed the title to RMW "Layout & Track Design" - all change............
  • RMweb Gold

All now dismantled including baseboards/framing - we might be moving house so that was the trigger but even if we don't it was a good thing to do as what I was building wasn't "futureproof"...………………...

 

First layout main lessons learned ………………….

  • All the Baseboards were set too high especially the raised section
  • The bridge across doorway was a bad idea
  • The baseboards were too deep especially in the shed/layout corners as access was poor
  • If I build another indoor OO layout here again next time DCC for sure - but if the house move happens a garden layout beckons

 

Note to self - all these things were suggested to me during the build process...…………………….:rolleyes:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...
  • RMweb Gold

Well that was quite a year!!

 

We did move house 2 weeks ago and the new railway environment is a 5m * 3m log cabin (very posh) in the garden app 3m square area available for layout use with the rest for "manufacturing"

 

Sadly my Mum was very poorly from June so we stopped boating and she passed away in August with the dreaded big "C" and now SWMBO's Mum challenges us much more with her dementia - comes to us all of a certain age I'm sure but its tough all in one year including the house move on top so looking forward to a quieter winter.

 

Likely layout to be based on one main modelled area with a very simple 2 "opposing" tracks on a narrow shelf running round 2 sides of the space the 3rd side is as yet undecided - probably DCC and possibly a change to diesel based stock - a lot more research needed and no rush.

 

I'm looking for comments on DCC - my uninformed motivation is less time wiring less time on my knees under baseboards during construction and less strain on my hip.

 

What height for baseboards??

 

No boating now until May so lots of time to make a good start probably another month before I actually get going with this one...……….

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking the baseboard height question first:-

 

I suggest there are no right or wrong answers to this, you just have to think through what suits you, so factors I think you should take account of are:-

 

1) Your height and reach.

2) How long will you operate the layout for at a time?- If you intend to run it for long sessions , sitting down will be more comfortable, so the layout can be lower than for standing to operate for short periods.

3) What view of layouts do you like? -I prefer near eye level so I pretend I am standing at the line side. Others are ok with the "helicopter" view!

4)  How deep will your baseboards be and how often will you need to access the rear 3 inches?

5) Might others of different height e.g. grandchildren want to view or operate the layout?

 

There might be other considerations such as:-

 

Will you be reaching over the layout to operate points by hand or electrically, the same for signals, uncoupling and turntable operation.

You have already mentioned that DCC seems to offer an easier life under the base boards, and the higher the boards, the easier this access is!

 

Re DCC, I think you should, as I did 9 months ago, take the plunge, provided you do not have a large fleet of pre year 2000 manufacture locos that may be difficult or impossible to chip!

However, you do need to think hard and long about whether you want to go for sound? This will increase the cost and sound in small locos can be difficult to install.

 

I suggest you look carefully at the above factors on height and DCC when you are next at an exhibition and go and ask lots of questions of both exhibitors and sales stands.

 

Hope the above thoughts help?

 

Cheers

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
15 hours ago, Tallpaul69 said:

Taking the baseboard height question first:-

 

I suggest there are no right or wrong answers to this, you just have to think through what suits you, so factors I think you should take account of are:-

 

1) Your height and reach.

2) How long will you operate the layout for at a time?- If you intend to run it for long sessions , sitting down will be more comfortable, so the layout can be lower than for standing to operate for short periods.

3) What view of layouts do you like? -I prefer near eye level so I pretend I am standing at the line side. Others are ok with the "helicopter" view!

4)  How deep will your baseboards be and how often will you need to access the rear 3 inches?

5) Might others of different height e.g. grandchildren want to view or operate the layout?

 

There might be other considerations such as:-

 

Will you be reaching over the layout to operate points by hand or electrically, the same for signals, uncoupling and turntable operation.

You have already mentioned that DCC seems to offer an easier life under the base boards, and the higher the boards, the easier this access is!

 

Re DCC, I think you should, as I did 9 months ago, take the plunge, provided you do not have a large fleet of pre year 2000 manufacture locos that may be difficult or impossible to chip!

However, you do need to think hard and long about whether you want to go for sound? This will increase the cost and sound in small locos can be difficult to install.

 

I suggest you look carefully at the above factors on height and DCC when you are next at an exhibition and go and ask lots of questions of both exhibitors and sales stands.

 

Hope the above thoughts help?

 

Cheers

Paul

VERY helpful thanks - I don't have a large fleet of locos so that's not an issue and I do want to do something different - I enjoy the creative stages rather than the running and the last layout was (for me) a great success but I almost want to start again and do it differently for its own sake 

I am thinking much more about a steam to diesel transition era with a bit of poetic licence and a branch line flavour modelled very loosely on the line I can see from my new house which is the one coming out of Leominster station heading from Hereford to Shrewsbury.

Not that this bothers me particularly but was there ever a legitimate period when diesels pulled private owner wagons and DMUs were operating as that's where my mind is heading - if this has to be purely fictitious so be it but it would be nice to know

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 hours ago, halsey said:

Not that this bothers me particularly but was there ever a legitimate period when diesels pulled private owner wagons and DMUs were operating as that's where my mind is heading - if this has to be purely fictitious so be it but it would be nice to know

 

Yes, but the wagons wouldn't have been repainted since before 1940 so would be looking very worn indeed by the late 50s (the models on this page give an idea of their probable condition).  Characterful in their way but possibly not what you were after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Thanks that's very useful - as you may easily know this - what diesels would be appropriate to run with tatty ex P/O wagons midlands/welsh borders - I suppose they would now be BR.

What I'm trying to do is maintain my stable of wagons when I convert my layout (and move away from Era3) to 60's and DCC - happy to move on my LMS carriages and/or sell/display old locos "derelict" on the layout.

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, halsey said:

VERY helpful thanks - I don't have a large fleet of locos so that's not an issue and I do want to do something different - I enjoy the creative stages rather than the running and the last layout was (for me) a great success but I almost want to start again and do it differently for its own sake 

I am thinking much more about a steam to diesel transition era with a bit of poetic licence and a branch line flavour modelled very loosely on the line I can see from my new house which is the one coming out of Leominster station heading from Hereford to Shrewsbury.

Not that this bothers me particularly but was there ever a legitimate period when diesels pulled private owner wagons and DMUs were operating as that's where my mind is heading - if this has to be purely fictitious so be it but it would be nice to know

When you say DMUs I guess you mean first generation?

So if we say Diesels and DMUs started to be around in numbers c1958, and the last steam on the WR in any numbers was c1964, that gives you a six year window for the possibility of Diesels pulling private owners wagons?

Around 1958 there would not be any private owners open wagons in brightly coloured liveries, but there were probably a few around in well worn dull remains of their former livery with lots of plain unpainted plank repairs. Vans might be a better bet, and of course there were the cement wagons.

The above is just off the top of my head. I am a GWR and WR modeler, but my knowledge of the Leominster area is sketchy!

 

I will come back to you again after consulting some of my reference books.

 

Like the basic idea though.

 

Regards

Paul  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

With DCC you will need to do similar amounts of wiring as DC, possibly more, depending on how you want to go about things.

 

It's typical to keep all parts of the track powered up at all times rather than switch them on and off manually and that can mean more wires if you were used to allowing the points to switch power to sections.

 

With all sections powered up all the time you just choose a loco on your controller and start driving . (You still have to set the points correctly of course!) That also means that locos with sound and lights keep working while they are standing in sidings or whatever. For instance, you want to hear your shunter to continue idling while it waits for a passenger train to pass by rather than artificially going silent.

 

Maybe you could make some of your boards movable so that they could be hinged up to give you comfortable access to the underside for wiring...?

 

Edited by Harlequin
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

My view on DCC is that it offers sufficient additional functionality over DC that it would be a bit daft to start a modelling "career" from scratch and use DC. If you've got a load of DC kit that you want to use then that's a different matter as conversion isn't cheap.

 

There's probably no less wiring, but if you understand electrical design you'll appreciate how much simpler the wiring scheme design is. There is definitely less requirement for other components, as electrical switching requirements are vastly reduced by what the chips do.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 30/11/2015 at 10:19, jon_1066 said:

 

 

post-16793-0-35276400-1448877929_thumb.jpg

 

 

 

Hi,

For those of you who may still be interested …………...having moved house and dismantled completely the above layout I am thinking of rebuilding it pretty much the same because I liked it but wanting the following mods to achieve some simplicity and better access.

NO upper level branch at all

Two tracks going around the room

Possibly using DCC instead

If you computer experts here who were involved before esp Jon David are able to tweak this track layout to achieve my thoughts and then overlay wiring/isolation needs (for both analogue and DCC??) that would be fantastic.

I am beginning to think I don't want to reinvent the wheel just build this time that which I would have built initially if I had known more...………..

Thanks

Edited by halsey
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎21‎/‎10‎/‎2019 at 12:21, Tallpaul69 said:

When you say DMUs I guess you mean first generation?

So if we say Diesels and DMUs started to be around in numbers c1958, and the last steam on the WR in any numbers was c1964, that gives you a six year window for the possibility of Diesels pulling private owners wagons?

Around 1958 there would not be any private owners open wagons in brightly coloured liveries, but there were probably a few around in well worn dull remains of their former livery with lots of plain unpainted plank repairs. Vans might be a better bet, and of course there were the cement wagons.

The above is just off the top of my head. I am a GWR and WR modeler, but my knowledge of the Leominster area is sketchy!

 

I will come back to you again after consulting some of my reference books.

 

Like the basic idea though.

 

Regards

Paul  

Apologies it has taken a few days to get back on this:-

It seems there were a few open wagons in well worn private owner livery around mid 1950s as the first diesels were coming out.

 

However I suggest your best bet for colour lies in the following:-

Private owners tankers

Peak roof salt wagons

Cement wagons (both vans and Presflows

ICI wagons (opens, salts, vans, tankers etc.). Not all of these were dark green.

St. Ivel (the brightest!) and other milk tankers.

 

Non of these would have been particularly bright as they would all be well weathered but you could have the occasional lightly weathered and therefore quite bright items (just not a whole train of them!)

 

Hope this gives you some ideas and provokes others to throw in their two pennyworth of ideas?

 

Happy modelling

cheers

Paul

Edited by Tallpaul69
forgotten item
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • RMweb Gold
On 26/10/2019 at 12:27, Tallpaul69 said:

Apologies it has taken a few days to get back on this:-

It seems there were a few open wagons in well worn private owner livery around mid 1950s as the first diesels were coming out.

 

However I suggest your best bet for colour lies in the following:-

Private owners tankers

Peak roof salt wagons

Cement wagons (both vans and Presflows

ICI wagons (opens, salts, vans, tankers etc.). Not all of these were dark green.

St. Ivel (the brightest!) and other milk tankers.

 

Non of these would have been particularly bright as they would all be well weathered but you could have the occasional lightly weathered and therefore quite bright items (just not a whole train of them!)

 

Hope this gives you some ideas and provokes others to throw in their two pennyworth of ideas?

 

Happy modelling

cheers

Paul

 

I don't think I ever replied to this - I decided to model my birthday era 1955 as it fits all the requirements - means got lots of weathering to do and some carriages to move on!

 

I bought a Bachmann model of the first LMS diesel "10000"and I am now looking for a W&M railbus which just fits the timing - not sure about Heljan though or that particular model as the reviews esp those involving DCC conversion/fitting are poor

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎20‎/‎01‎/‎2020 at 16:38, halsey said:

 

I don't think I ever replied to this - I decided to model my birthday era 1955 as it fits all the requirements - means got lots of weathering to do and some carriages to move on!

 

I bought a Bachmann model of the first LMS diesel "10000"and I am now looking for a W&M railbus which just fits the timing - not sure about Heljan though or that particular model as the reviews esp those involving DCC conversion/fitting are poor

Fair enough! I don't get upset if folks don't reply to my postings, I am afraid I sometimes forget or get sidetracked myself.

Its your layout so Rule 1 applies.

Sorry, can't help with the W&M Railbus, not my era or railway line.

 

Your other thread suggests the layout is developing well so good on you.

 

Cheers

Paul

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...