Jump to content
 

SCC - Sparkshot Custom Creations - 3D Design/Printed Loco Kits etc


Knuckles
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Cambrian 'Albion' Small Passenger Class and Furness E1 4 wheeled tenders are now available with the 4 chassis options, 00, EM & P4 & 7mm 0 Gauge. Details in the product descriptions. Very happy with how these have turned out.

The brake handle and railings will be separate items due to them being so thin, this way it reduces a print fail risk.

 

4mm WSF/BSF:

https://www.shapeways.com/product/88HFLXKE7/cambrian-albion-spc-tender-wsf

https://www.shapeways.com/product/SBFRRXRAT/furness-e1-tender-wsf?optionId=63361926

 

4mm FUD/FXD:

https://www.shapeways.com/product/42T23JHEQ/cambrian-albion-spc-tender-fud-fxd

https://www.shapeways.com/product/VAU4FS5DA/furness-e1-tender-fud-fxd

 

4mm Chassis' (Both materials):

https://www.shapeways.com/product/2VMVTVENC/furness-e1-cambrian-spc-tender-00-chassis?optionId=63361584

https://www.shapeways.com/product/23E9CDNJ3/furness-e1-cambrian-spc-tender-em-chassis?optionId=63361588

https://www.shapeways.com/product/BT9VSUUWM/furness-e1-cambrian-spc-tender-p4-chassis?optionId=63361592

 

7mm Versions:

Chassis https://www.shapeways.com/product/YVKKB5D2M/7mm-fr-e1-cambrian-spc-tender-0-chassis?optionId=63370533

Cambrian Albion Tender Body https://www.shapeways.com/product/2ASEDJLSC/7mm-cambrian-albion-spc-tender

Furness E1 Tender Body https://www.shapeways.com/product/K8YLNRZ65/7mm-furness-e1-tender

 

 

Both tenders at a glance are very similar but there are notable differences.

The chassis are common to both bodies, other than the brake pads I have decided

not to model the brake gear this time due to a lack of clear photographs and drawings for them.

Visually I can see quite clearly how the majority of the arrangements work (similar to a basic wagon with cam arrangement) but to model them

accurately with the current lacking info would likely result in much guess work and I'd rather not do that.

Plus being thin they again run risk of print fails so brass rod and such like is the best option currently.

 

 

The following picture is a quick collection I made of the Furness version shortly before splitting it down into component parts.

The brake pads are still odd and there are two filler caps on the top, obviously you would pick the ones you need from sprue. Also the curved coal divider is optional so you can discard it if need be.

ONfIyM4.jpg

Edited by Knuckles
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

www.shapeways.com/shops/sparkshotcustomcreationsscc…

A0 Prototype Pacific RANGE RELEASED. Follow up pictures, video and maybe some more items may follow.

Shown is just one of the Full shells, currently the only one although I will be uploading a few. However MOST combinations you'll have to make yourself.

 

I know this is a niche subject yet important to me either way. :thumb

 

Showing a Full loco shell, a few more will follow however MOST combinations you'll have to make yourself. Details within.

qG3Enkc.png

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Brilliant and marvellous models! Any chance we could see the L&YR Class 28 Mogul Experiment in N Scale, please?

Sure, will get on it tomorrow. Re-scaling is my current priority anyway.

 

It is my aim to eventually have all the locomotives available in all the 3 main scales. N, 4mm (all 3 gauges) and 0.

I do understand the difference between N's 1:148 and the 2FS 1:152 difference in case anyone is worried.

 

 

 

Important point. I will re-scale and tweak the loco and tender bodies to N but unless you are comfortable with a 3D printed fixed axle chassis

in such a small size I don't think it would be a good idea to re-scale them simply because I cannot test the running qualities.

I do some N modelling but currently haven't tried to build a working chassis in the scale. For that small is likely currently beyond my modelling

ability where micro bushes, muffs and gears are involved.

 

Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

 

Most people are comfortable melding an RTR chassis to a N body anyway but I'd rather be sure of your (everyone's collective) intents. :)

Edited by Knuckles
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, will get on it tomorrow. Re-scaling is my current priority anyway.

 

It is my aim to eventually have all the locomotives available in all the 3 main scales. N, 4mm (all 3 gauges) and 0.

I do understand the difference between N's 1:148 and the 2FS 1:152 difference in case anyone is worried.

 

 

 

Important point. I will re-scale and tweak the loco and tender bodies to N but unless you are comfortable with a 3D printed fixed axle chassis

in such a small size I don't think it would be a good idea to re-scale them simply because I cannot test the running qualities.

I do some N modelling but currently haven't tried to build a working chassis in the scale. For that small is likely currently beyond my modelling

ability where micro bushes, muffs and gears are involved.

 

Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

 

Most people are comfortable melding an RTR chassis to a N body anyway but I'd rather be sure of your (everyone's collective) intents. :)

Great! I might either a Fowler 4F Chassis or a Crab Chassis with the cylinders and valve gear removed and that would fit in fine. Which do you think could work best?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly do not know. I haven't a 4F or Crab in N to experiment with.

 

I think a Crab might be best as the Mogul Experiment is supposed to run with 5' 6" wheels and the Crab I believe is the same. In fact based on my research so far I believe the Crab was built instead of the Mogul Experiment so likely best bet.

 

Don't quote me on that though. I can only speculate currently. As well as the wheels you have the space in the body to consider too.

 

I'll get to work on re-scales soon though.

Edited by Knuckles
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright. The Crab chassis it is, then. And thanks. By the way, would it be possible to use the Bachmann Crab Chassis on the 00 L&YR Class 28 Mogul Experiment but with removal of valve gear and cylinders? It did get me thinking.

Edited by LNWR18901910
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what I was thinking yes. Just use the coupling rods.

I do not know how well it would fit and how much fettling may be needed though.

Good luck with that. If I am able to purchase a body shell of the Class 28 Mogul Experiment, then I would need to find the Bachmann Crab Chassis and maybe try and remove valve gear and cylinders. Getting it to fit is the next step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with that. If I am able to purchase a body shell of the Class 28 Mogul Experiment, then I would need to find the Bachmann Crab Chassis and maybe try and remove valve gear and cylinders. Getting it to fit is the next step.

Aye, I had to thicken the insides of the splashers and a few bits up due to its smaller size and the printing tolerances so maybe slightly smaller wheels would be better. I cannot currently tell, however...

 

https://www.shapeways.com/product/NAHNCH5S2/n-1-148-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment?optionId=63943834

 

!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, I had to thicken the insides of the splashers and a few bits up due to its smaller size and the printing tolerances so maybe slightly smaller wheels would be better. I cannot currently tell, however...

 

https://www.shapeways.com/product/NAHNCH5S2/n-1-148-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment?optionId=63943834

 

!

Wow! It looks fantastic! You did a great job and thanks again! I love it! I wish I could purchase it if I had a shapeways account, though. Maybe a Fowler 4F with a pony truck at the front would suffice?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fowler 4F would likely be suitable. I know some used a 4F chassis for the 4mm version.

 

You don't need a Shapeways account to make a purchase there, it just makes it easier to communicate with me and other designers on there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fowler 4F would likely be suitable. I know some used a 4F chassis for the 4mm version.

 

You don't need a Shapeways account to make a purchase there, it just makes it easier to communicate with me and other designers on there.

I see. Maybe I could try it perhaps. I want to purchase the Mogul Experiment body, but I wonder how else? To complete it, I'll also need either an N Scale 4F chassis which is either the old one or the new one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah you keep saying. Only one way to find out, I've made the body available now so that's 50% the challenge gone.

 

So for everyone, the N gauge body is here https://www.shapeways.com/product/NAHNCH5S2/n-1-148-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment?optionId=63943833

The 7mm Re-scale and tweaked body is here https://www.shapeways.com/product/6N25TWJSS/7mm-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment

The 7mm 0 Gauge Chassis here https://www.shapeways.com/product/FRXQJ9ENT/7mm-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment-0-chassis?optionId=63943977

 

It so far is looking like the coupling rods cannot be offered due to bounding box issues so apologies for that. Currently beyond my control though.

 

Re-scaling and optimizing thicknesses for each is an on going process so keep your eyes peeled and please make your interests known as that likely will

change my priority for the re-scales as currently I'm neutral to which order I do them in.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah you keep saying. Only one way to find out, I've made the body available now so that's 50% the challenge gone.

 

So for everyone, the N gauge body is here https://www.shapeways.com/product/NAHNCH5S2/n-1-148-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment?optionId=63943833

The 7mm Re-scale and tweaked body is here https://www.shapeways.com/product/6N25TWJSS/7mm-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment

The 7mm 0 Gauge Chassis here https://www.shapeways.com/product/FRXQJ9ENT/7mm-l-yr-class-28-mogul-experiment-0-chassis?optionId=63943977

 

It so far is looking like the coupling rods cannot be offered due to bounding box issues so apologies for that. Currently beyond my control though.

 

Re-scaling and optimizing thicknesses for each is an on going process so keep your eyes peeled and please make your interests known as that likely will

change my priority for the re-scales as currently I'm neutral to which order I do them in.

They look fantastic! You did a great job on those.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

It's easy to set up a Shapeways account. Literally a 2 minute job. User name and password is all you need!

 

To anyone considering one of SCC's products, just jump right in. Gavin has done an excellent job designing (and building - his instructional videos are fully descriptive and refreshingly honest), and the 3D print rendition of the Furness J1 (which I have had delivered) is terrific in FUD.

 

No connection other than a satisfied punter and a fan of esoteric pre-grouping subjects...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to set up a Shapeways account. Literally a 2 minute job. User name and password is all you need!

 

To anyone considering one of SCC's products, just jump right in. Gavin has done an excellent job designing (and building - his instructional videos are fully descriptive and refreshingly honest), and the 3D print rendition of the Furness J1 (which I have had delivered) is terrific in FUD.

 

No connection other than a satisfied punter and a fan of esoteric pre-grouping subjects...

I'll give it a matter of thought. For now, I can hope for the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...