Renato Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 (edited) Hello, I am an Italian railway modeller and I need help to apply a simple fix to a Gaugemaster P controller bought back in the '80s in order to restore Inertia/brake simulator functionality. The controller works but Inertia/Brake simulator does not, most likely because of a broken wire solder. I am not keen enough with electronics and simply don't know where the wire should be reconnected. So I reverse-engineered the circuit diagram and ask some kind advice where to solder the wire. In the attachments you can see the controller data sheet, the controller open with visible interrupted wire and the circuit diagram Thanks for any advice, Renato Edited November 25, 2017 by Renato Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium dhjgreen Posted November 30, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted November 30, 2017 As no-one has come back to you, have you tried looking for the frayed end of the wire on the board or one of the components? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokebox Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 My (slightly educated) guess is that it should go to the positive supply rail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium dhjgreen Posted November 30, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted November 30, 2017 Certaintly it would do no harm to try it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokebox Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Looking further, is this a hole in the PCB where the wire came from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky Dicky Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 I thought Gaugemaster offered a lifetime guarantee, send it back to them. Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renato Posted November 30, 2017 Author Share Posted November 30, 2017 thank you all for advice. Answering to suggestions in order: there is no frayed end on the pcb side unfortunately I will try to connect the wire to the positiver rail and report reults, thank you no the hole is or a bolt that holds the pcb in place on top of an isolator column Lifetime is remarkable but shipment cost from and to Italy probably is quite high. thank you all, I will report result of trial Renato Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Dunsignalling Posted November 30, 2017 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 30, 2017 I thought Gaugemaster offered a lifetime guarantee, send it back to them. Richard Void once you open them up. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John ks Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Hello CC, Out of interest further Googling brought this circuit up, ostensibly from a Codar (never heard of them) controller. Looks as though S1 switches in the 'inertia' and R7/C1 regulates the ammount, I guess :-) Cheers - Jim While this is not the same as your controller it is very similar Firstly is the area I have circled been correctly back engineered? The connection of the 2 capacitors across the output transistor is not where(with my limited knowledge electronics) I would have thought they should be connected C2 & C3 seem to correspond to the 2 capacitors (circled) in your diagram If these controllers are so similar then I would expect the loose wire to go to the negative (Black wires are often used for negative (maybe a red herring)) Hope this helps John John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butler Henderson Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 (edited) Have you thought of contacting Gaugemaster - they probably will be able to advise you what goes where. I foolishly stuck a drill into a dcc accessory decoder and the supplier (not Gaugemaster) was a great help, advising on the components I needed to replace and providing a couple of resistors free of charge. Thankfully I had only destroyed those resistors and damaged a couple of transistors which I replaced, although it did take a bit of pestering to get the relative extract of the circuit out of them. Edited December 1, 2017 by Butler Henderson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renato Posted December 1, 2017 Author Share Posted December 1, 2017 DId not have time to try yet. Thank you John, I will look once more into my diagram And thank you Butler, If my attempt fails I will write to Gaugemaster Renato Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royaloak Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 would it be possible to lay the cable in its normal position and see where it ends up, as long as you havent bent the wire too much it should return to (near enough) its original shape which would at least roughly give you a clue where it connects too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cliff park Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 One puzzle that nobody sees to have asked (or dd I miss it) :- how or why did the wire come off?? Wires don't just fall off inside a sealed box. If there was movement of the potentiometer I would expect the wire to come off at that end. The point is if we knew what prompted it to 'fall' off there might be a clue as to where it came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renato Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 Hello, the wire came off at the circuit end, long ago, probably because of an accidental collision. The controller had been used with open cover (it was installed on a sort of a wooden rack). The wire laid off was close to the printed circuit but there are many possible connections in the range of a coulpe centimetres. And no evidence of broken wire on the PCB. However I think I could find the solution (or A solution at least). I soldered the wire to the brush of the "regulator" pot, as you can see on the schematic attached below. When "Simulator" switch is in OFF position there is a sort of a direct feedback connection between the central point of the capacitor partitioner and the brush of the "regulator" pot which controls current to the base of the leftmost transistor. With the connection I made, "Simulator" switch ON intruduces a variable resistance in series to this feedback circuit, thus providing slower evolution of the operating point, so to say (My English probably sounds horrible, hope you can understand). I tested the circuit and it works fine. The 100 kOhm position of the pot is marked "Brake OFF" on the front panel and this way when turning the regulator pot upwards from zero the locomotive hums a bit (some pulse oscillation I think) and slowly picks up speed. If I turn the regulator pot down to zero the loco continues at same speed and slows down in a very long time (more than 15 s). When at zero speed it hums until I turn regulator pot to zero. I then turned regulator pot up again, let the loco catch speed and returned regulator pot to zero. After that I turned brake pot up towards the "FULL brake" position and the loco speed slowed down faster. The more brake rotation up, the faster deceleration. When loco is stopped if I turn brake back to zero it will start again, until I turn regulator down to zero or brake pot up again. And this works both in forward and reverse direction. THe only worry I have is that the humming at stop is quite noisy so probably there is a high current ripple. To be safe I turned the regulator quickly down after loco stopped. Here below the schematic with the wire connected (I also added wire color indication for my convenience). Maybe this is not the best fix, don't know, I will keep locomotives monitored for overheat. Thank you all for advice and support. Renato Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium kevinlms Posted December 3, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 3, 2017 Hello, the wire came off at the circuit end, long ago, probably because of an accidental collision. The controller had been used with open cover (it was installed on a sort of a wooden rack). The wire laid off was close to the printed circuit but there are many possible connections in the range of a coulpe centimetres. And no evidence of broken wire on the PCB. However I think I could find the solution (or A solution at least). I soldered the wire to the brush of the "regulator" pot, as you can see on the schematic attached below. When "Simulator" switch is in OFF position there is a sort of a direct feedback connection between the central point of the capacitor partitioner and the brush of the "regulator" pot which controls current to the base of the leftmost transistor. With the connection I made, "Simulator" switch ON intruduces a variable resistance in series to this feedback circuit, thus providing slower evolution of the operating point, so to say (My English probably sounds horrible, hope you can understand). I tested the circuit and it works fine. The 100 kOhm position of the pot is marked "Brake OFF" on the front panel and this way when turning the regulator pot upwards from zero the locomotive hums a bit (some pulse oscillation I think) and slowly picks up speed. If I turn the regulator pot down to zero the loco continues at same speed and slows down in a very long time (more than 15 s). When at zero speed it hums until I turn regulator pot to zero. I then turned regulator pot up again, let the loco catch speed and returned regulator pot to zero. After that I turned brake pot up towards the "FULL brake" position and the loco speed slowed down faster. The more brake rotation up, the faster deceleration. When loco is stopped if I turn brake back to zero it will start again, until I turn regulator down to zero or brake pot up again. And this works both in forward and reverse direction. THe only worry I have is that the humming at stop is quite noisy so probably there is a high current ripple. To be safe I turned the regulator quickly down after loco stopped. Here below the schematic with the wire connected (I also added wire color indication for my convenience). Maybe this is not the best fix, don't know, I will keep locomotives monitored for overheat. Thank you all for advice and support. Renato It does appear that you have found the correct location for this wire - well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now