Jump to content
RMweb
 

GWR Plate Girder Bridges


Recommended Posts

Hi Guys and Gals,

 

Maes y Coed plan originally had a 'road over' plate girder bridge at one end but I scrapped that idea thinking in wildest North Wales in 1910 they would have used other materials. Instead I went for a Wills SS53 brick arch bridge thinking it would be more fitting to the location and era. Once built, I realised the kit was useless both it terms of its overall construction and its detail so that got cosigned to the scrapyard! The next idea was a simple level crossing as used at the other end of the model, which I would start building after I completed the station building. Then I found this -

CynwydStationc_1912.jpg.805c4e58b22e4212e34529bcba14dc70.jpeg.0f54db55723303b5dcc837695cfc39ed.jpeg

Cynwyd station in 1912. Cynwyd is on the Ruabon/Dolgellau line as is the mythical Maes y Coed so it's back to a plate girder bridge! However it's all going to have to be scratch built. Can anyone kindly point me in the direction of where to find the construction of GWR plate girder bridges? I am guessing there will be girders/RSJs between the plate girders plus some form of planking to support the roadway (gravel in 1910). Why were the plates split horizontally? Any ideas?

 

Mr Google has failed me in this instance so any advice will be greatly appreciated.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rovex said:

The road way was usually supported on brick arches built on girders running between the two side frames. I'll see if I can find an example on line to post

 

Have a look at this site, under jack arches.

https://sremg.org.uk/structures/struct_11.html

Many thanks @rovex and many thanks to everyone else. Brick arches between lateral H beams makes sense, reinforced concrete as a structural material not having been developed until after the 1880's when the bridge would have been built. I doubt I will be building the bridge soffit (not seen) but it does give me an idea as to where the road surface would be in relation to the side plate girders. In the model, the bridge abuts the end board so I will only be building half the width of the bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@KeithMacdonald Many thanks for posting. This is educated guesswork. Looking at the Cynwyd bridge, I think the deck structure fitted within the depth of the lower panels. Bearing in mind the bridge would have been built when this section of the Ruabon/Dolgellau line was constructed (1885ish) I recon the basic structure would have been short span brick arches between riveted iron 'H' or 'T' section beams. I doubt these beams would have spanned abutment to abutment but spanned the shortest span from plate girder to plate girder and would probably have been located at the plate junctions where the girders would have been at their strongest. The roadway above the arches would have been formed of crushed stone in layers, each one getting finer. In 1910, there would have been no macadam surface, just fine gravel.

In the photo, the plate girders appear to be supported on corbeled padstones. These appear to corbel out to increase the width of the abutment rather than reduce the span of the plate girders, which I find a little strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rowan said:

@KeithMacdonald Many thanks for posting. This is educated guesswork. Looking at the Cynwyd bridge, I think the deck structure fitted within the depth of the lower panels. Bearing in mind the bridge would have been built when this section of the Ruabon/Dolgellau line was constructed (1885ish) I recon the basic structure would have been short span brick arches between riveted iron 'H' or 'T' section beams. I doubt these beams would have spanned abutment to abutment but spanned the shortest span from plate girder to plate girder and would probably have been located at the plate junctions where the girders would have been at their strongest. The roadway above the arches would have been formed of crushed stone in layers, each one getting finer. In 1910, there would have been no macadam surface, just fine gravel.

In the photo, the plate girders appear to be supported on corbeled padstones. These appear to corbel out to increase the width of the abutment rather than reduce the span of the plate girders, which I find a little strange.

To get the required depth of girder, they may have been plates with steel angles rivetted to the upper and lower edges; that would give something for the top and bottom plates to be attached to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...