Jump to content
 

A Home for a Terrier


Sir Madog

Recommended Posts

Now that Dapol´s Terrier will soon be hitting the market, it´s about time to think of a worthy home for it.

 

Unfortunately, it won´t be a big home for that not so little doggie, as the space I have for a layout can not exceed 10´ by 2´ (in metric - 3.0m by 0.6m) - not much to give that fella the necessary exercise, but good enough for a little old fashioned shunting work.

 

Oh, I nearly forgot to tell - on the right side of the layout, it ha to narrow down to a foot - if I want to avoid issues with SWMBO.

 

I am not so keen about a sweet rural setting, industrial or urban is fine for me, but I have no idea how to come up with a layout design, which is rewarding to build, nice to look at and interesting to operate.

 

Is there anybody around willing to help me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Several of the Terriers worked the Newhaven harbour lines which included dock & quarry sidings,warehouses, tramway, swing bridges etc

 

Worth looking for old aerial photos & maps

 

Google will find photo & IRR article & plan from 1973

 

Dava

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several of the Terriers worked the Newhaven harbour lines which included dock & quarry sidings,warehouses, tramway, swing bridges etc

 

Worth looking for old aerial photos & maps

 

Google will find photo & IRR article & plan from 1973

 

Dava

I'd second something based on Newhaven. Try searching the 'ournewhaven' website for 'terrier'. Some cracking, inspirational pictures. http://www.ournewhaven.org.uk/category/searchgoogle.aspx?q=terrier

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Great photos of Newhaven & Terriers on the harbour line, lots of scope for a small layout here

 

My project is just 6 feet, see microlayouts

 

Dava

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're into Light Railways, you could always do a little terminus. Run around loop and a couple of sidings is all you need. Perhaps something based on the "Timesaver" concept.

 

Or perhaps something based on Ffarquhar:

 

(Top right of the plan, shown on three modules here)

 

rm-1968-01-ffarquhar.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Just that the loco looks like a D1 (0-4-2 T larger version) than a Terrier to me.

 

I'm reading an old book on the Kent & East Sussex which was\is one of their true homes!

 

Dava

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the Gauge O Guild website you can find, under publications, their splendid book on small layout designs. As many of them have actually been built, they provide a realistic resource for mini layouts which should be operable.

 

There are two volumes.

 

Ed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must obtain a copy of Volume 2!

 

Me too!

 

In the meantime, I have developed a first idea for a layout, based on an idea I think Ian Rice once put on paper for a "stacked" layout. I took the middle part and adapted it to O gauge and the space I have.

 

Terrier_Home_zpsqpcdjzut.jpg

 

I am not yet completely happy with it, but this is as good as I can do it at the moment. Your thoughts and amendments are highly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice idea. I think I would make the engine shed a single track affair and extend the platform line to make a loop with the ersthwile shed line. Two loops would provide plenty of play operational flexibility.

 

Here is a scan of the Iain Rice stacked layout. I've always had a soft spot for this design. My favourite is the one with the exchange siding allowing the appearance of main-line and privately owned locos. I would however, reverse the crossover to the exchange siding taking it off a 3-way tandem on the industrial line.

 

post-13142-0-16425600-1427126995_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would tend to agree about having a second run round loop for the platform. Not sure you would even need a loco shed, maybe just coal & water. Possibly, use another 3-way on the right hand side to gain a bit more usable trackage.

(Just my thoughts.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think I would make the engine shed a single track affair and extend the platform line to make a loop with the erstwhile shed line.

ME2. The value of a run round on a passenger platform cannot be underestimated for operation appeal. Where as an extra road on a shed is just a place to hide a second loco. (just how many do you need/have on a layout this size before it starts to look more like an MPD.

 

I would also swap the first two points so that the passenger traffic has priority (1st point to go straight to the passenger platform) OK this will shorten the warehouse loop a little but the 3-way could also be moved a little to recover the length. But its your layout you know what is important to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea of having a passing siding at the station and also swapping the points at the right end of the layout. I have been trying to incorporate that into the track plan, but failed. I´d need minimum and extra 2 ft. for that, which I don´t have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks more sensible to me- two shed roads is very much overkill, in fact one shed road probably is! I actually think it looks OK with the station loop points inside the goods yard loop points, and this allows you to run around a passenger train without the loco going "off scene" which is generally more satisfying to watch- obviously the freight shunt does involve an exit stage left but for some reason this seems better to me than the passenger shunt doing so- possibly because the passenger loop is in the foreground.

 

The main downside I can see is that you have a lot of pointwork and effectively only three shunting operations- loco on shed, passenger train in station, goods train under the loading dock (& potentially the rear FY road if you are treating that as an extended siding, bringing it up to four- but using that siding would involve moving the stock under the canopy).     

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...