McGomez Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 I recently bought some Peco dummy point motors and was about to fit them when I realised that there was more than one way to place them. I´ve looked through some books for clues and the web but I´ve not found any conclusive evidence of which way is the correct way OR can they be placed either way? The second question is what part of the point motor connected to the tie bar? The smaller of the 3 tabs that protrude either side or are the 2 larger tabs both connected to the point via 2 tie bars? The third question is, can a point motor be positioned between 2 running lines as seen on the photo below, of a crossover? I wasn´t going to put them there but just wondered? My layout is predominantly late 70s/early 80s if that has any bearing on matters. Thanks in advance. Andy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TheSignalEngineer Posted April 12, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 12, 2014 (edited) Try this shot. The three rods to the left of the switch blades are for the lock and detector slides. The other single one drives the points. The two bits sticking out on the base sit on the extended timbers. Edit; Usually best to put it in the widest available interval if it can't go in the cess. Edited April 12, 2014 by TheSignalEngineer 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium phil-b259 Posted April 12, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 12, 2014 The type of point machine illustrated is called a "HW Point Machine" produced these days by Signalling solutions (was Alstom / GEC) in two versions depending on whether they have a straight friction or an electromagnetic clutch - the latter being AC immune for overhead areas. As you can see the operating bits come out of the grey covers (and the bits themselves can be swapped round to operate a point on the other side with relative ease). The point machine thus needs to sit with the sleep being between the two grey covers with the cover towards the middle being located above the point operating tie-bar extension. However it is important to remember that you need to extend the sleepers so the point machine actually sits on top of - not next to them as I have seen in at least one picture on the net. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGomez Posted April 12, 2014 Author Share Posted April 12, 2014 (edited) Many thanks for the replies, guys. Appreciated. Were there any other designs of point motor that would have been seen during the 70s/early 80s? In the Signal Engineers photo, would the cables running into the tube and under the rails have been painted orange as you see on today´s railway? Would those cables have run into concrete cable trunking or would they have gone into some sort of metal control cabinet? Once again, thanks in advance. Andy. (Edited for typo) Edited April 13, 2014 by McGomez Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted April 12, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 12, 2014 Many thanks for the replies, guys. Appreciated. Were there any other designs of point motor that would have been seen during the 70s/early 80s? In the Signal Engineers photo, would the cables running into the tube and under the rails have been painted orange as you see on today´s railway? Would those cables have run into concrete cable trunking or would they have gone into some sort of metal control cabinet? Once agian, thanks in advance. Andy. Huge variety of point machines still in use in the 1970s as some quite old designs were still being installed up the mid 1960s and possibly later in that decade and of course some pre-war installations made it into the very early 1970s. Generally under the Modernisation Plan resignalling schemes a single main contractor did a particular scheme or area so it would be their style of signals and their own point machine design but with painting and numbering to the particular BR Region's individual standards. I think the orange pipe is 1980s but can't be sure on that one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southernman46 Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 and the innards just for flavour................. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 A few from me.. I've noticed several layouts at exhibitions where the machines are placed incorrectly. On the one layout where they were placed somewhere near right no attempt had been made to represent the extended timbers. 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete 75C Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 Huge variety of point machines still in use in the 1970s as some quite old designs were still being installed up the mid 1960s and possibly later in that decade and of course some pre-war installations made it into the very early 1970s. Generally under the Modernisation Plan resignalling schemes a single main contractor did a particular scheme or area so it would be their style of signals and their own point machine design but with painting and numbering to the particular BR Region's individual standards. I think the orange pipe is 1980s but can't be sure on that one. There was a thread covering this a while back, sorry, I can't for the life of me remember what the title was, but the general consensus was that the orange ducting was post 1976, so 80s for sure. There were the usual disagreements that it could be seen earlier than the mid 70s and also not until the 90s! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 Oh and the machine should be 3' 3'' or 990mm from inside edge of running rail to centre line of machine (13mm in OO?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Del Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 In SignalEngineer's photo, the pipe would have been self-coloured orange plastic (not painted) when new, and has got quite heavily 'weathered'. The cables themselves wouldn't be coloured. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 And how not to do it.. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGomez Posted April 13, 2014 Author Share Posted April 13, 2014 Thanks once again for the replies gents. Re the orange tube. I meant the tube but it does read as though I was referring to the cable so thanks Del. Maybe the orange tubes of today are made of a type of plastic that is self cleaning?? I can´t remember them from my late 70s/early 80s youth thats for sure. Re the innards, it certainly makes wiring a Tortoise look easy! With your help I have now ballasted around my first point and added the motor. I extended the sleepers but I think I over did it a bit! There must be a prototype for it somewhere though! I should have also cut the original sleepers back to the slots that are for the installation of the PECO underboard motors. I´ll have to fill them as they stand out like a sore thumb. I also glued some old offcuts of LED legs (always knew they´d come in handy!) to the underside of the motor housing to give a representation of the blade actuators. This is my one and only catch point. Hopefully it can be treated in exactly the same way as a normal point? 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted April 13, 2014 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 13, 2014 Thanks once again for the replies gents. Re the orange tube. I meant the tube but it does read as though I was referring to the cable so thanks Del. Maybe the orange tubes of today are made of a type of plastic that is self cleaning?? I can´t remember them from my late 70s/early 80s youth thats for sure. Re the innards, it certainly makes wiring a Tortoise look easy! With your help I have now ballasted around my first point and added the motor. I extended the sleepers but I think I over did it a bit! There must be a prototype for it somewhere though! I should have also cut the original sleepers back to the slots that are for the installation of the PECO underboard motors. I´ll have to fill them as they stand out like a sore thumb. I also glued some old offcuts of LED legs (always knew they´d come in handy!) to the underside of the motor housing to give a representation of the blade actuators. 14-04-13 Dummy Point motor (1) - copia.JPG 14-04-13 Dummy Point motor (2) - copia.JPG This is my one and only catch point. Hopefully it can be treated in exactly the same way as a normal point? Yes but with one proviso - on the Peco catch/trap point there is only a single switch blade therefore instead of 3 detector rods you only needs one (although in reality most motorised traps have two switch rails nowadays). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 Yes but with one proviso - on the Peco catch/trap point there is only a single switch blade therefore instead of 3 detector rods you only needs one (although in reality most motorised traps have two switch rails nowadays). As a complete aside i'm looking for the photos of a pair of HW's i've installed on a Network Rail main line with no lock rod or detection rods.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 Found one! Wasn't on the computer but on a disc. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted April 13, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 13, 2014 Found one! Wasn't on the computer but on a disc. DSC02712.jpg Hi Richard What is this motor operating, please? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 Hi Richard What is this motor operating, please? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Clive Mortimore Posted April 13, 2014 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 13, 2014 HI Richard Is it a lock for a swing bridge, ECML double track, Selby? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 (edited) Sliding bridge double track Keadby. Photo possibly taken on 30th November 2003 at 15:40 and nine seconds... Edited April 13, 2014 by LNERGE 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGomez Posted April 14, 2014 Author Share Posted April 14, 2014 Yes but with one proviso - on the Peco catch/trap point there is only a single switch blade therefore instead of 3 detector rods you only needs one (although in reality most motorised traps have two switch rails nowadays). Thanks Mike. Snipped the 2 that were not required. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete 75C Posted April 14, 2014 Share Posted April 14, 2014 I have to say Andy, that does look rather good. I'm at the ballasting stage myself and now feel the need to add some point motors. Being lazy, I wasn't going to bother but your pictures have changed my mind! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGomez Posted April 14, 2014 Author Share Posted April 14, 2014 I have to say Andy, that does look rather good. I'm at the ballasting stage myself and now feel the need to add some point motors. Being lazy, I wasn't going to bother but your pictures have changed my mind! Thanks Pete. I was discussing with a friend at the weekend the fact that it´s the small details that bring a layout to life which in my case is pretty hypocritical as I reckon that point motor is the first small detail I´ve added to my roundy roundy layout in 7 or so years of building!! Wadden Marsh is looking really good. I hadn´t dropped in for 2 weeks. There wasn´t any track down then. You´ve now got track and scenics!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete 75C Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 I have to agree about the little details but I'm a recent convert. I read an article by Cyril Freezer years ago that said if something can't be clearly seen from average viewing distance why bother with it? I used that as a mantra for years but as I've only got a 6' x 18" scenic section at the moment, I've now changed my mind. Point motors have been purchased! Lineside troughing and ground signals may be on the cards too. At this rate, I might scratchbuild something... God forbid! Good luck with the layout. Pete. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNERGE Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Thanks Pete. I was discussing with a friend at the weekend the fact that it´s the small details that bring a layout to life which in my case is pretty hypocritical as I reckon that point motor is the first small detail I´ve added to my roundy roundy layout in 7 or so years of building!! Wadden Marsh is looking really good. I hadn´t dropped in for 2 weeks. There wasn´t any track down then. You´ve now got track and scenics!! Now all you need is a little sound file that plays every time you operate a point.. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGomez Posted April 15, 2014 Author Share Posted April 15, 2014 Now all you need is a little sound file that plays every time you operate a point.. I´ve got 2 Fulgarex point motors that are louder than that!! I finally went for the tortoise. Thanks for uploading. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now