Jump to content
 

Ian Smith

Members
  • Posts

    1,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Ian Smith

  1. On 29/10/2021 at 14:37, Mikkel said:

    Excellent views, Ian. I have noticed before that photos from the "wrong" side can be just as good or even better than the normal ones. I wonder if it's because the angles are less "designed" and therefore in fact seem more natural.

     

    Anyway, that hose over the rail fence is a nice touch, haven't seen that before. I've enjoyed watching the layout in videos from Uckfield too, sounds like it went well.

     

    I quite agree about “non-normal” viewing angles. Some weeks ago I casually thought about turning Modbury around, and adding 6” to what is currently the front of the layout, so that it would be viewed from the yard side - I quickly discarded the thought as madness :D

     

    The Uckfield exhibition was very enjoyable, it was really nice to have a degree of normality back, and to see old friends again. Modbury for the most part behaved itself, there was an odd derailment coming onto/off the train table fiddle yards, and the occasional problem with the DG couplings used. All of the locos performed well (including the steam railmotor).

    Ian

    • Like 3
    • Agree 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. 7 hours ago, Mikkel said:

    Thanks Matt, just an old-fashioned flu.

     

    The great thing about Ian's GWR tarps is that you can change the numbers and dates etc with photo editing software. It's surprisingly time consuming though, as the number is repeated so many times. My solution is to "cut" the number once, change it, and then rotate copies of the new number to suit, but even that takes time.

     

     

     

    Mikkel,

    I left the numbers on the bottom of the artwork for that very reason, I usually make up the required number in the blank area, the copy and paste from there, rotating on sheet as necessary to overlay the original numbers.

    Ian

    PS. I can’t remember how long either version remained in service, but for my circa 1906 period I use both for variety - perhaps I should change my timescales to c.1902-06 :D

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  3. 6 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

    I too had the pleasure of seeing the layout at Uckfield. I was impressed by how small everything is: from the amount of detail apparent in photos and videos, one might expect it to be 7 mm scale...

    Stephen,

    It was very nice to meet you at last and put a mask to a name :D

    Thank you for the kind comments, I hope you enjoyed Modbury (and Sherton Abbas, Wadebridge, et al).  You are not the first to comment that virtually the stock and layout have a "bigger" presence :lol:

     

    Ian

    • Like 2
  4. 1 hour ago, Argos said:

    Hope all goes well Ian. Uckfield always looks like a great show. Unfortunately just too far for us northerners to travel to! Very jealous. 

    I live in the Midlands, and to be honest I think long and hard about going anywhere near London, let alone anywhere the other side of it!  I’m 60 years old and this will be the first time I will set foot in Sussex :D

    Going North, East, West or South West I haven’t got a problem with :rolleyes:

    • Like 3
  5. Modbury will be attending its first exhibition in almost 2 years this weekend at the Uckfield Model Railway Exhibition.

     

    Really looking forward to the weekend!  For Edwardian GWR fans, Dave Stone will also be there with Sherton  Abbas, and for 2FS fans, John Greenwood will be there with Wadebridge and Padstow too.

    Ian

    • Like 12
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  6. 1 hour ago, westernviscount said:

     

    You've clearly inspired some excellent modelling Tim. 

     

    After a long day, I will need help to understand how the doors have been hung backwards? Much head scratching has ensued. 

    I think it’s down to the diagonals - bottom of diagonal should be on the hinge side of door.

    • Agree 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  7. I very rarely feel the need to subscribe to these discussions, but I must admit that I get really fed up about people moaning about the difficulty of subscribing to or contacting MRJ.

     

    My own view is that whatever the reasons are, the production team have decided not to embrace some “modern” payment or contact methods.  We all need to accept that.

     

    For me, that philosophy doesn’t detract from the best model railway magazine available, indeed from a letters point of view I imagine that that philosophy would be an absolute boon as it minimises / prevents the dross that the keyboard warriors would submit - if one has to truly put pen to paper and then go to the effort of putting a stamp on an envelope and then putting it in a post box then hopefully the content will actually be worth reading!

     

    I personally don’t “subscribe” to the magazine, preferring to purchase my copies from a national newsagent, but I do have nearly every edition nonetheless.

     

    In short, I guess what I’m trying to say is that if someone’s business model works for them but not for you then the problem is yours not theirs!

     

    On issue 285, well done Jerry!  One of the best!

    Ian

    • Like 8
    • Agree 9
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  8. 28 minutes ago, nick_bastable said:

    I have found this stuff https://www.troutcatchers.co.uk/tungsten-sheet-c2x17213338

    useful at adding some extra weight

     

    Nick B 

    Don’t bother with this. I ordered a couple of packs a couple of years ago from troutcatchers only to find that the tungsten is “suspended” or woven into a fine mesh. It’s probably great for weighing down a fishing line whilst not poisoning anything but is quite useless for weighting model railway locos or stock.  
     

    I have some small scales and when I cut a similar amount of this sheet to compare with a similarly sized piece of lead was really disappointed to find that the lead was significantly heavier.

     

    Ian

     

    edit to add photo of what I bought :

    039DBB57-D50D-4641-A668-34B594321976.jpeg.80e684b7284c52df4eeca1c302464081.jpeg

    • Informative/Useful 1
  9. Jim,

    I don’t think that your methods or ideas are oddball or eccentric.  So long as whatever you do gives you pleasure while you’re doing it and the end results satisfy you then that is all that matters - we engage in a hobby for our own enjoyment primarily, if along the way others find enjoyment, inspiration or any other good feelings too from what you do then so much the better!

     

    From a purely personal perspective, I thoroughly enjoy seeing how others (yourself included) achieve their results - I invariably learn something new or different, whether I then go on to try something different is another thing though :D


    Even now I regularly delve into the 2mm Archive or early MRJ’s for inspiration - it’s probably just me but I get far more pleasure (and inspiration) from reading about Connerburn, Tumill & Haddon, Chipping Norton, Lambourn, etc (just 2mm mentioned here although other scales inspire too)  articles from the 1980’s than I do from many of the articles from the last 20-30 years.

     

    Ian

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 5
    • Thanks 1
  10. Would an alternative be to print on Matt photo paper (or glossy if Matt varnish applied afterwards), as being thicker and having a printed surface unlike ordinary paper would perhaps resist pva bleed through from the rear?

    I hasten to add that I’ve never tried it but thought I’d “put it out there” in the hope that someone may have and is willing to share their experience.

    Ian

     

    edit:

    PS goods shed looks very nice Jim, are the platform openings on the viewing side? Shame if not, but mine is the same on Modbury :huh:

  11. 3 hours ago, Trewisin said:

    Hi Ian, did you look at the 3D printed horse drawn vehicles by @Tricky-CRS on the road vehicles page may be some interesting time period pieces that I believe you were looking for. Nice Motorcoach will  look better in paint. Regards Ray .

    Ray,

    I have never strayed into the “Road vehicles” thread before, so wasn’t aware of any 3D prints of horse drawn vehicles in n gauge. Thank you for drawing my attention to it. Unfortunately I couldn’t seem to find any details of tricky-crs’s wares anywhere apart from a couple of posts on said thread. These seem to be showing screen shots of 3D models rather than actual physical models, and I couldn’t find a web presence either so have no real what is available or at what cost.

    Ian

    • Agree 1
  12. John,

    I like that a lot. The distressing of the plank bottoms is very subtle, and the fact that one or two glazing bars overlap is only noticeable in the cruel close up (and only then because I looked for it because you’d mentioned it! :))

    Keep the photos coming - when I started 2mm modelling a few years ago, the photos of Tavistock on the 2mm website (along with others) were what inspired me most when building Modbury. Thank you.

    Ian

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  13. I have just caught up with this thread and the fascinating discussion on the colouring of the Healing wagon. I have absolutely nothing of value to add to the discussion, however someone (several people) mentioned the difference of livery between the wagon and board description - my only comment would be that perhaps the person placing the board was illiterate anyway, and also that the photographer would be there just to take the photo (probably one of several that day) and would be looking at framing the photo rather than interested in what was written on the boards or that they related in any way to the main subject of his focus.

    Ian

    • Like 2
    • Informative/Useful 1
  14. 5 hours ago, Donw said:

     

    Grahame

    We are hoping to camp at Exeter Racecourse in the motorhome sometime and the walk along the estuary looks inviting. Do you know if  the car parks along there have height barriers. Another place we like to visit is the nature reserve at Dawlish Warren we went there when living at Brixham but by car and I cannot remember whether there was a barrier there.

    I do remember clearly there was a barrier at Sharkam Point, Brixham.

     

    Regards Don

     

    Don,

    just a thought but would Google street view be able to show height barriers?

    Ian

  15. 9 hours ago, nick_bastable said:

    Valentins a nice guy Im sure Martin Paul and I will be having encouraging words with him at the next months group meet.  Like me he get deterred   given Im on attempt No whatever to convert a Farish 3f although Ive already done one .  Valentin has built a beautiful   C class etch which ran very well but like me fiddled and broke it ( we all learn )  In retrospect should  have left the 3f alone when it first worked :ireful:

     

    Nick B

    Nick, I have met Valentin a few times and agree he is a thoroughly nice guy. I was hoping my message would come across as supportive. I’m glad he has access to an area group to lend support!
    Like many, I too have felt the need to tinker with something that is already acceptable and actually made things worse. In those events I always tell myself that having got it to run once I can do it again. Although sometimes putting it aside for a day or few to allow the frustrations to subside is necessary! 

    Ian

    • Thanks 1
  16. Valentin,

    Sorry to hear that you feel that you are unable to complete your chassis. Like Ian it took me an age to get a 2FS chassis running the way I wanted / expected.  
     

    I tried 2FS in the 1980’s / early 90’s (long before etched chassis were available), I attempted 3 different locos in that period and gave up with them all, and subsequently 2mm modelling altogether.  
     

    When I came back to railway modelling Jerry convinced me to try 2FS again with an Association chassis. I nearly gave up again as it took me 3 attempts to get it assembled and running reasonably! However, I was determined so persevered and was able to get my 2mm scale eye in as it were - I found getting used to the small size took me a while, but over the last few years my confidence has grown and I now feel comfortable trying to model in 2mm scale.  I hope that you too will be able to overcome your setbacks too. As Ian says, it looks like you’ve done most of the hard work.

    Ian

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...