Jump to content
RMweb
 

Ian Smith

Members
  • Posts

    1,402
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Ian Smith

  1. 12 hours ago, Ian Morgan said:

     

    Nit-picking, but actually more like Mercury capsules than Apollo ones. :dirol_mini:

     

     

    Ian,

    You’re quite right of course, getting my space programs mixed up :blink:

  2. 6 hours ago, CF MRC said:

    Bloodstock on CF will soon be improving...

    D6C83538-D48B-4404-82E3-D2F5C142F793.png
    So we shall need some shovels and wheelbarrows...


    Tim

    Tim,

    Really nice to see some horses in 2mm scale that actually look like horses!!

    I really must take a micro chisel and low melt solder to the white metal lumps in my collection.

    Ian

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 2
  3. 5 hours ago, Mikkel said:

     

    The model is looking superb Ian.

     

    I assume that, afterwards, you'll be doing those 5-6 Siphons in the background? :)

     

    1 hour ago, bgman said:

     

    It'd be rude not too ! 

    Hmmm, 5 or 6 siphons or another loco? Decisions, decisions :rolleyes:

     

    Then again, there’s that train of clerestory bogie stock that I keep promising myself that I ought to get on with!

    • Like 5
    • Agree 1
  4. On 28/04/2021 at 11:22, richbrummitt said:

    How has the fit turned out wrt. the drive on the front driver being visible from the side, especially with having to reduce the diameter of the worm gear with the result that the motor shaft sits  lower than originally intended?

    Rich,

    In short the interior gubbins is completely hidden! I was careful to only remove what I needed to to clear the worm and motor shaft (the Tramfabriek 6x15 motor is completely hidden within the tanks).

     

    Rich1.JPG.ec68cea679e89d89176e40e2fc308533.JPG

    Underside of the boiler assembly to illustrate the areas removed to a) allow it to sit snuggly on top of the tanks and b) to clear the motor shaft and the worm.  The red staining within the boiler tube is evidence of the heat applied when I silver soldered the boiler barrel into the rebate in the firebox.

     

    Rich2.JPG.d881779b5f678cbd0f3ae4a730b7a8c8.JPG

    Side on view that shows that the motor shaft is actually a little higher than the bottom of the boiler, and the worm is hidden behind the splashers.  When I have made and fitted the springs that sit behind the splashers the end "shackles" will probably even hide what can be seen of the cutout below the boiler.

     

    Just realised that that low down side on shot also gives away my secret - an outside pick-up spring that plugs into the side of my solid chassis.  The plug is usually a bit of 0.5mm phosphor bronze but on this loco it's a piece of 1mm brass wire (in my haste I'd drilled the holes too big by picking up the wrong sized drill! - I had just drilled 12BA tapping holes).  On this side it only goes in 1mm as this is the 1mm strip side of the chassis.  The spring itself is some fine phosphor bronze wire which wraps around the plug once and is soldered to it.  The spring wire is cut to reach the outer extremities of the flange so that there is no chance of it ever catching on the spokes, obviously it bears on the top of the axle like any normal "Simpson" spring.  Looking at this photo on the computer screen I've also just realised that I've put the coupling rod on upside down on the side - that will be addressed when I next warm up my hot stick.

     

    Ian

    • Like 12
    • Agree 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  5. As promised, a link to part of my Modbury thread, showing the last coach I painted.  The coach itself is an S6 All Third which I have finished with Oil lamps (an earlier one in the same rake has Gas lamps.

     

    A couple of pages earlier in the thread I described how I paint the coaches, here :

     

    Hope it is helpful.

     

    Ian

    • Like 1
  6. C19 is coming along very nicely, when I paint my coaches in this livery (albeit in 2mm scale), I do the mouldings with a 0.1mm nibbed Rotring pen with their own black ink. There is always re-touching to do on panels which I tend to do with thinned paint and small brush and copious use of capillary action.

    As I’m writing this response on my mobile I can’t link to suitable entries in my RMweb Modbury thread here, but if I remember later I’ll update this entry with a suitable link.

    Keep up the good work.

    Ian

    • Thanks 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Edwardian said:

     

    Thanks, Ian, that's a great photograph.

     

    I am trying to curate this conversation as neutrally as possible, because the only thing I'm sure of is that we cannot be sure of these points. Hence I tried to sum this issue up as representing plausible alternatives.  My personal view is that I see a logic in consistent GW practice, apparently from the days of all-over brown in the 1850s, through to the all-over grey of the 1904 livery.  I try to judge each image or other piece of evidence as objectively as I can, nevertheless.

     

    I would venture the following: 

     

    - None of these seem to be long-bonnet minks. As I wouldn't put the earliest likely possible shift to grey earlier than 1898, I think it very likely that we are looking at 3 red minks.

     

    - Like you, I cannot see any difference in tone.  To me this is not definitive proof that same tone indicates same colour - weathered to an even finished might be an explanation - but it probably makes it more likely to be the case.  Certainly there is nothing in this photograph to evidence black painted areas.  As neutrally as possible I would say this picture offers no positive evidence for black painted areas and tends to support all-over red. 

     

    - Bear in mind, however, that the rooves probably started off white, which has blackened to grey, leaving a tone not very much difference from the body red, suggesting, perhaps, the limitations of judging colour from black and white tone.  That said, the uniformity of tone across a single plane of view between body and chassis and running gear is remarkable.  

     

    - The brake van we agree will be grey. Do we think it an all-over grey?  If so, that would speak for a consistency of practice. 

     

     

     

     

    James,

    I think that what has been offered by yourself and others is very definitely a neutral viewpoint.  Personally, I have no axe to grind one way or another, as I don't think that the evidence is there to fully support or fully refute any argument.  As your previous set of images shows there is "evidence" that can be offered to support almost any argument, including that of black ironwork with red (or possibly even grey) woodwork!  Interestingly (to me at least) is the 4 planked 632 with the cast plates, as in looking for the accident photo I came upon that one and my immediate thought was that the woodwork does look a different colour to the ironwork (it's certainly a different tone, but it is also glossy rather than the matt of the woodwork which potentially confuses the issue further).

     

    I have also revisited the images of wagons in the Broad Gauge dump which one would imagine are all red wagons, and again to my eyes I do not see a vastly different tone between the body work and the underframe to indicate that the lower parts of the wagons were in fact a different colour.  Obviously the wagons in those images are all at the end of their lives so are well weathered, by that I mean that as the demise of the Broad Gauge was on the cards for a while before it happened I cannot believe that any of the stock would have been repainted within 2 or 3 years (or probably more) of 1892.

     

    Although there will probably never be any new evidence to come to light, I do find these discussions very interesting and enlightening.

     

    Ian

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  8. 13 hours ago, tapdieuk said:

    A half dozen  P O wagons.

    2 diffrent wagon bodies to give a bit of varation. The older mouldings needing some internal details. 

     

     

    A  bit tedious at times, but progress is being made. 

     

    Batch build PO wagons

     

    I assume that one of the half dozen is lying to the right of the underframe etches and has been printed in (very) clear resin :jester:

     

    Ian

  9. In defence of my view of red wagons being red over all, one of the images that I used to come to that conclusion is offered below.  The image comes from the Outside Brake Van article by John Lewis in a British Railway Journal (No. 17).

     

    1421165333_AA16Accident.jpg.d99ead23aa27843404cbdaf0bf9c24e9.jpg

    As can be seen it is of an accident, and interestingly one of the Iron Minks is lying on its side, meaning that body side, solebar and brake gear handle are all in the same plane and exposed to the sunlight in a similar way (rather than being cast in shadow by the over-hanging body).  In my view the tone of the whole wagon seems to indicate that there is no discernible colour difference between the body and the solebar or axleboxes or the brake lever.  The liveries of the (visible) Iron Minks is the 5" G.W.R, and the caption estimates a time period 1897-1903, so I've reasonably assumed that the wagons would all be in red livery (except the Brake Van of course).

     

    Thoughts???

     

    Ian 

    • Like 3
    • Informative/Useful 3
  10. Aah the lid on the old can of worms is being prised off again :D

     

    Personally, I have adopted a grey date somewhat before 1904, in that the wagons I’ve applied cast plates to are in grey livery. I’ve also gone with an all over red livery, ie everything below the solebar is also red.

     

     I have no evidence for any of the decisions I’ve taken though! The first open wagon I fitted the plates to was red but I felt it didn’t look right so repainted it grey (I have gone with white lettering on a grey background for my plates), and I adopted the all over red simply because the later livery was an all over grey.

     

    Ian

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  11. 25 minutes ago, Royal42 said:

    Hello all, I am in need of advice please.  I am about to order a turnout set, plus some bullhead sleepers and loco wheels, for my Birmingham New Street diorama.  My problem is that I do not understand how to identify the components of what I need.  Can anyone help with these queries?

     

    a.   there appears to be two sizes of sleepers, 8ft 6in and 9ft 0in, which size would I need for the ex-LMS/LNWR up to 1964?

     

    b.  Looking at the available locomotive wheels available, Mk.4 and Mk.5 etc., how can I identify what locos they would fit?

     

    c.  how can I identify and work out what radius turnout I need?  The turnouts on my layout appear to be fairly gentle but that isn't a recognised term when ordering these.  Any advice here please?

     

    new_street_station_08c.jpg.c326b4cbdc42287bbe616152b4e42ec9.jpg

     

    The items I want to buy will be my first test/taster to building the rest of this layout and so would like to order the correct bits.

     

    cheers,

    Mike

    Mike,

    There are many other members who are much more qualified to answer your queries, but ...

    a. 9’0” sleepers were a pre-grouping size (pre 1923), so by 1964 in a main line situation like Brum New St I would expect 8’6” sleepers - I have no idea when concrete sleepers were introduced so they may be needed (anyone who knows me and my interest will understand that final comment).

    b. The loco wheels supplied by the Association are “generic” so may not be entirely suitable for a specific class of locomotive (as a group we don’t generally concern ourselves too much about that although we do have H section spoked or Bullied wheels for certain circumstances). The older Mk4 wheels are cast brass, the new Mk5 being derived from 3D printing.

    c. I can’t really advise on the Association turnout kits as I have never used them (again anyone who knows me will know why) :jester:

     

    hopefully someone with better knowledge will be along soon.

    Ian

  12. 6 hours ago, Donw said:

    Yes I can see the improvement in the Spectacles. Brave man to risk spoiling the paint job changing them. The 517 is coming on beautifully .

     

    Don                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

    Don, the spectacles were annoying me. Especially when I compared the Dean Goods to the Metro and Buffalo, so I knew I could turn something up a little finer. Initially I thought I might be able to sand the originals a little thinner but decided that the risk/reward was too heavily weighted on the risk side. In the end I decided I couldn’t live with it as it was.

    Thank you for the kind comments on the 517.

    Ian

    • Like 2
  13. 42 minutes ago, Ian Morgan said:

    You might have a problem with BR Mk3 coaches hitting each other on those close curved fiddle yard tracks :dirol_mini:

     

     

    The gap is very tight, but I’ve checked my widest/most over hanging locos and stock and all is good. Luckily as Don mentioned I have no intention of building any Dreadnought coaches (or even Concertina ones for that matter). The only bogie coach I have in a running condition is only a forty footer so not much longer than my 4 or 6 wheelers.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...