Jump to content
 

Tony Teague

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    2,451
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tony Teague

  1. Incidentally, have just noticed that I started this thread exactly 2 years ago today! Thanks to all of those who follow it, make comments and give feedback, we are up to 22,450 views which I am pretty pleased with. Tony
  2. Hi Chris Yes, a good looking loco - I haven't yet managed to give her a good run but I should manage that over the next couple of days I don't know of the Center Models kit but I can imagine what the whitemetal chassi block would have looked like! Tony
  3. A new arrival today from loco builder Chris Phillips was this model of East Kent Railway No. of the "Victory" class: This loco was one of 10 built by Kerr Stuart in 1917 and was first owned by the Inland Waterways & Docks Dept, and used for shunting at Richborough Port in Kent; it was transferred to the East Kent Railway in 1919 where it worked local services to the Kent collieries. Technically it never came onto the Southern Railway's books as it passed from EKR to BR upon nationalisation where it was given no.30948 which it never carried. It was scrapped in 1949. For me it is a "nice to have", having been serviced at Ashford Works in 1948 - so it will probably remain in near pristine condition. Only after taking the pictures did I notice that the top lamp bracket has got bent in transit - it will be rectified! The model is from a kit by CSP Agenoria and is another one off my "missing" list, so here is a progress update on that topic: Missing locos where the solution is now in hand (4): LB&SCR Billinton E5X (4) - 3D printed body now available + SEF E5 chassis kit held for assembly to start as soon as the E6-X is complete LB&SCR Billinton E6X (2) - assembly almost completed (by me) per previous posts, from 3D printed body + SEF E6 chassis kit LSWR Drummond L12 (20) - assembly by 'thegreenhowards' very advanced from parts produced by Arun Sharma + Hornby T9 RTR chassis SECR Kirtey R (18) - assembly (by me) at advanced stage from SE Finecast R1 kit Missing locos where a potential solution has been identified (10): SECR Wainwright B1 (16) - a Jidenco kit exists but I can't find one (and it may not be that great!) LB&SCR Billinton B4X (12) - potential solution through a 3D printed body under exploration LSWR Drummond C14 (3) - potential solution = CSP / Agenoria kit announced years ago but yet to be delivered LB&SCR Marsh D3X (1) - potential solution through indication of a forthcoming 3D printed body, chassis to be sourced LB&SCR Billinton E4X (4)- potential solution through a 3D printed body + RTR Bachmann E4 chassis under exploration SECR Wainwright F1 (9) - solution = Jidenco kit held but not yet in build (& may be difficult / lacking accuracy) SR Maunsell I1X (18) - potential solution through a 3D printed body explored + Alan Gibson milled chassis frames obtained LSWR Drummond S11 (10) - potential solution to use Arun Sharma's cast L12 parts + modified SE Finecast T9 chassis under consideration Soton Dock Co. 0458 (1) - possible solution to modify CSP Agenoria kit CSP 04 identified & kit now obtained DS75 (1) - exploring possible solution vianewly drawn etches Missing locos where no solution has yet been identified (3): LB&SCR Marsh C3 (8) KESR 0-8-0T Hecate (1) Fowler diesel shunter (2) So in summary, there is still a way to go, but there are solutions available for the majority of the missing locos - any additional or alternate solutions welcomed! Tony
  4. Hmmm.... the primer is not as magical as you think, and there are some fairly rough areas which will need attention before it gets a 2nd coat. I am awaiting some very small sanding sticks to get into small corners. You are right about the haulage capability; fortunately the E6-X will take a lot of lead inside the boiler and side tanks, and it will need as much as I can get in there, because the body is light as a feather. I think the truth is that this print is about as good as 3D printing gets at the moment - and it is worthwhile for the odd prototype for which no alternatives exist; the "assembly" work has been minimal and the cost is not much more than for a standard kit. In the end I hope to get the finish to be good enough from "normal viewing distance" but it certainly won't stand close scrutiny against the finish of a modern RTR loco. The experience I have gained on this will certainly be helpful as Javier has now finished a bit of re-working on the E5-X and will shortly move on to other locos that are on my "missing" list. Well done on Stowe! If I was nearer I'd be keen to join in and I am certainly keen to see it in steam! Best wishes Tony
  5. Andy (thegreenhwards) has provided me with a progress update on his work on my LSWR / SR L12 loco. The steps are now fitted and he has added the trim around the cab windows, smokebox door dart and Markits spring buffers, plus a coupling and lamp irons; he has also been fettling the fit of the body to the chassis and having moved the attachment point back 0.5mm and filed some brass off the inside of the splashers it now fits nicely with no shorting. The loco is seen here performing a test run with 10 coaches on Andy's layout - haulage capability looks vastly superior to that of the T9 which donated the chassis and motor, probably because of the greatly increased weight of the white metal body: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqqstRvwGrw Some detailing work remains before painting - addition of trim to the cab roof, fitting clack and snifter valves, plus handrails etc. The loco will be finished in wartime black + sunshine lettering - another one from the "missing list"! Tony
  6. Some further progress with the E6-X ! Having 'parked' the chassis whilst waiting for missing bits, I moved over to the body and fitted brass / nickel silver handrails, clack valves, smokebox door handles and a steam pipe; the cab door-side handrails were particularly tricky as the 3D print is very thin in that area - so I was careful, but not careful enough and managed to break off both sets of rear steps! I have yet to decide whether to re-attach them or to use nickel-silver ones that were included on the chassis etch; I also have brass sprung buffers for the loco but will not fit them before painting. I think the "face" of the loco is looking pretty reasonable: I have given the body a first undercoat which shows that a little more cleaning up is required. The steam pipe on the left side looks a bit like a banana in the picture - it is better in real life but probably needs a little more work! I now need to get the chassis completed - which is mainly about the rear wheels, plus the brakes, and then work out more precisely how the body will be fixed to the chassis - I am reluctant to drill the 3D print for a bolt! The loco will be finished in unlined black and then weathered, and I am keen to get this one finished as the E5-X is waiting in the wings! Tony
  7. Is that a slug on the roof? (Hope it's not a live one!) Tony
  8. Stunning modelling Simon - and the end will justify all of the effort that you have put in. Tony
  9. Have not been idle since my last post and will soon post a further update but in the meantime, I have been going through the archives and came across this faded shot taken on Stowe Magna shed! Tony
  10. Trial fitting of the wheels to the E6-X chassis showed that ride height was actually spot on - so no further adjustments required, although there is some adjustment neded in terms of how the body is fixed to the chassis - I am not sure that the 3D printed plastic can be drilled to take a bolt!: So I pressed on and as of the end of the day I have a motorised, free-rolling chassis, which has been run in for a half hour on the rolling road: During the build I discovered that the axle and smaller rear bogie wheels were missing from my chassis kit, so tomorrow I will be off to Scaleforum where Dave Ellis of South Eastern Finecast has offered to bring some with him - excellent service! With the body now sitting on the chassis, it is beginning to look like a locomotive: Although it has yet to receive any paint, the second print looks even better now that I have added the splashers, which come printed inside the loco body: I also hope to pick up some brass fittings tomorrow, such as sprung buffers, clack valves, a whistle and firebox door handles tomorrow as I think these will add a lot to the look of the finished loco. Tony
  11. Thanks AdeMoore I have no connections with Poppy's who also do various laser cut things in wood; I was recommended to the product via Tony Wright, see: http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/64295-wright-writes/?p=2540958 Tony
  12. About a month ago I reported the arrival of a 3D printed body for an ex-LB&SCR E6-X loco from Shapeways (one of my missing locos!) but have not managed to find time to work on it since - until now! In fact, Shapeways had sent me an earlier, but faulty, print which they rapidly agreed to replace and so I turned this problem to advantage by using the faulty print as a test bed for painting schemes; here it is painted in white acrylic primer: and then with an aerosol satin black - you can see the flaws in the print along the tank sides: These tests have given me confidence that I will be able to achieve a presentable finish using the much better replacement print, and so I have now started to build the chassis, which is from an E6 kit by South Eastern Finecast; the E6 had identical wheel sizes and configuration to the E6-X which was derived from it: For the experienced reader I should point out that this is only the third loco chassis that I have ever built! - I am therefore open to constructive improvement suggestions! It is seen sitting here in "Poppys Jig" - a device that I find most helpful - with the connecting rods placed along the outside so as to ensure the chassis is square: I then checked this for fit against the body: this revealed that whilst the body fitted snuggly at the rear, there would be a problem at the front, where the "foot" underneath the boiler sits exactly above a screwed brass frame spacer that protrudes above the top of the chassis: Having soldered a further spacer towards the front of the chassis, I decided to remove the screwed brass spacer completely: This has resolved the particular problem, but further adjustment(s) maybe required to get the ride height correct: This is as far as I got today, so my next job will be to trial fit the wheels to the chassis to ensure that it runs freely, but also to confirm ride height and if necessary make further adjustments. I will then finish the chassis before moving on to detail the body. Tony
  13. Yes, built years ago and now very dated / not up to current spec, but with so much still to be done, a re-build or replacement is not likely to happen! Tony
  14. These two S15's are both built from DJH kits (but not by me!): No.499 is the Urie version built an painted for me by Chris Phillips: No.847 is the Maunsell version which I acquired via Tony from the estate of a deceased modeller and so the builder is unknown: As has been said, Hornby have only produced the Maunsell version and there is no doubt that it has a level of detail that the kit-built examples do not achieve; nevertheless they are pretty good models with excellent haulage capability. I love the look of the S15's; here is the real thing on the Bluebell Railway (my image): [with apologies - not often I can post SR pictures on an LNER thread!] Tony
  15. I have also made further progress on the area in front of Churminster South signal box, so that one can now get long views into the shed and station: In the distance, to the left one can see Wadley's Brewery buildings; these four shots were taken using focus stacking and I have posted them in larger format because the level of detail that one can see by zooming in is considerable! (Just click on each image for the larger version). The T9 in front of the box is one of my recent weathering projects: The bare / unpainted wood to the centre left is the back of the control panel, which is difficult to omit at this angle; the "muddy" area to the bottom left is the location for the old village of Churminster, at the bottom of the hill and cut off from the newer part at the top when the railway came through. It will be the last area to get modelled on the whole layout because it is such a handy area to put things on! Tony
  16. The Kirk / Maunsell brake composite is now completed barring couplings and some tweaking of ride height: I don't think it looks bad, until you see it alongside the Hornby Maunsells, at which point the deep window mouldings stand out: I guess that it is a model "of it's time" but whether it would look right in the ACE alongside an otherwise Hornby rake is questionable I may have to find other uses for it.
  17. Andy Thanks for the update - knowing that you were otherwise occupied, I had refrained from asking, but progress looks real. Yes, I can send you the parts you mention, and I was also intending that we use the T9 backhead so I will sort out these bits and mail them. Thanks again for taking this on! Tony
  18. You may have been lucky - or used a different type of PVA. This took about 15 years to show: The key issue seems to be that it was enclosed - the side tanks were also filled but showed no sign of expansion. Tony
  19. Thanks Mick! I did wonder whether the brassicas needed a bit of weathering, but I'll probably leave alone! Tony
  20. Thanks for responding to my query; it sounds very sophisticated, and having seen it in action I know it works. I think I will start by consulting my own neighbourhood electronics genius, but failing that, I had also thought of exploring the use of IRDOTs, having already got over a hundred installed and working on the railway. Many thanks! Tony
  21. According to "The Book of The Schools" (Irwell Press), your Schools can't be within the first 10 which had smaller windows and flat sided tenders ( although the latter could have got swapped around later). All but 5 of the class appeared in pre-war malachite, and all but 8 in post war malachite - and some locos also had the wider chimneys fitted by 1939, so you have a lot of choice as to suitable candidates, e.g. 914 from 1946 to 1950, 919 from 1941 to 1943 and 1946 to 1949, 924 from 1940 to 1943 and 1947 to 1950, 938 from 1940 to 1943 and 1946 to 1948 (random examples). Good luck! Tony
  22. Andy I have seen your daughter's work on LB - excellent! I think you are right on the coal, there are a couple of lumps that would kill a scale fireman! I must break them down. Best wishes Tony
×
×
  • Create New...