Jump to content
 

69843

Members
  • Posts

    2,130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 69843

  1. 22 hours ago, ERIC ALLTORQUE said:

    If this keeps up it will drive you to Guinness,as long as its not the guy in Transit holding things up still.

    Part of me wonders if Guinness and a long night at the Accurascale office were involved, they've misplaced the models and now are trying to remember where they put them when playing "Hide the 37"

     

  2. 15 hours ago, rapidoandy said:

    Having asked the question it all looks to be good to go. As ‘our’ (Rapido) order book has been extended they have also kept theirs open to match.

    Thanks Andy. Was a little confused as it was past the cutoff date but nothing had been heard.

    I look forward to my RT/HH02, and might have to take it down to see PWD79 one day.

  3. On 29/10/2021 at 19:05, Skinnylinny said:

    Spotted on the Hardy's Hobbies website:

    https://hardyshobbies.co.uk/shop/partners/rapido/rapido-trains-hunslet-16in-0-6-0st-plain-versions/

    They appear to be offering unlined, unlettered versions, subject to meeting minimum pre-order numbers in each livery. Plus, each one will come with a driver and fireman figure from the Hardy's range. 

    An easier answer to those wanting their own liveries without having to remove various printed-on details?

    Has anyone heard if they did indeed meet the minimal cut-off number for these to proceed? 

  4. On 17/11/2021 at 23:14, TomScrut said:

    I although if a lot of MRAs are out of use maybe with my layout being based 2020-2021 that I should move my 10 on to replace with something else.

    Well if you have a set of 859Bs you wouldn't mind parting with, I'm sure I could send them on a nice long sabbatical to Australia ;).

    I really picked the wrong end of the decade to want MRAs and JJAs...

  5. G'day all,

    Asking on behalf of a friend investigating the DRS Stobart/Tesco train-what class is the twin platform wagon in the attached photograph? We are aware that it is not an IKA (or at least the type as modelled by Dapol) and is definitely not an IDA, but are stumped as to what it is. Unfortunately no search of photos or videos has given us a clear enough view of the code to work it out. Is anyone able to lend a hand?
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/94418464@N08/9175857125/

  6. On 01/11/2021 at 05:07, TheEngineShed said:

     

    That circular cut-out should be an easy fix, assuming there isn't tender frame structure behind it...

    I agree, and it's on my list of small changes to sort.

    I just find a bit of irony in a fix being applied but then the other fix not being applied.

    • Agree 2
  7. 2 hours ago, chris p bacon said:

    Hornby naming the GT3 as model of the year with its issues and mistakes says more about HM and it’s relationship with KR. 

    Regardless of your thoughts on the model, which are not entirely unfair, this shows more about your lack of understanding with the vote than if you'd not tried for the snide remark at the end.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  8. 5 hours ago, adb968008 said:

    I wonder why there is no word on the class 89, i’m sure that would be much more popular.

    Without trying to wander too far off topic on page 1, I believe it was mentioned it has been due to having trouble accessing the locomotive to scan it at the depot it is/was being reactivated at.

×
×
  • Create New...