Jump to content
 

BernardTPM

Members
  • Posts

    5,661
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by BernardTPM

  1. 1 hour ago, Jol Wilkinson said:

    Largely because they have built in safety features required by law. Perhaps the size (width) of the average  person has also increased.

    You could always go back to the day of the sliding window Mini where the only thing between you and a side collision was the door panel and its layer of vinyl trim

    Good idea. Lots of resource saved, will weigh less so use less fuel (electric or otherwise) and more room to pass on narrow roads. Compared to walking (or the bike I ride) it's still wasteful though.

    • Like 4
  2. 3 hours ago, DaveF said:

    Some photos at Barking on both the London Tilbury and Southend and LT lines.  For those who knew the area at the time I had probably gone there to visit Guy Norris to look at records and model railway things.

    I used to work there some Saturdays around that time when I was a student at QMC. That end of the parade is gone now, replaced by the Vicarage Field Shopping Centre, though I see that is now coming down to be replaced yet again.

    • Like 1
  3. One of the more obvious differences between the large and Small England cabs is that the latter are near to symetrical, so the front and rear panels are about the same size.

    EnglandCabs.jpg.126b13bce5cc49b0d7afb4aef77f0b7e.jpg

    Left: Small England (Princess), Right Large England (Welsh Pony)

    Incidentally, the old FR 'Prince' kit of the 1960s/'70s was actually 'Welsh Pony'.

    • Informative/Useful 1
  4. The van and the odd half-open wagon look to have scratchbuilt bodies, but on two different commercial chassis. The brake van looks like it has been shortened from a standard length van, but whether a kit or not it's hard to tell. A view of the underside of these three might give some clues.

     

    I agree the P.O. opens are probably Peco. I built an example with the early wooden body in C &G Ayres livery; I still have the box!

  5. 12 hours ago, Rasendyll said:

    rassy2978_orthographic_pencil_and_watercolour_sketch_rear_view__64682a69-d998-451e-9ce4-8593c45faa55.png

    It has certainly thrown up some interesting scenes, but perhaps doesn't understand the concept of essentially identical, mirrored rows of houses that typifies late 19th Century terraced housing. Where I used to live there were essentially just four styles of house in the whole road, I assume because each plot was developed at about the same time but by different developers/builders.

    • Like 1
  6. The Dinky models scales were based on Imperial measures, the nearest to 7mm scale (1:43.5) being 17/64" per foot (about 7.08mm per foot or 1:43.06). These were mostly cars, but also includes the Coles Crane. The list I've seen was updated to 16th Feb.1961 so doesn't include later models.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  7. I've had trouble with gmail addresses since last November when they apparently made changes. I can receive messages from a gmail addresses but I just can't get a reply back to them, they're always rejected, nor send a new e-mail to them. For me a gmail address is useless.

  8. 17 hours ago, cypherman said:

    Hi Bernard,

    I believe you are right about the body. But the chassis is a late 1950s split framed one. Unless they used the split metal chassis until the 1970s.

    I'm not sure they ever updated that chassis construction; perhaps why they abandoned it in favour of the new Holden tank in 1978. I would be interested to see an all-cast version if anyone has one.

    The sprung wire pick-up makes it later than some as do the see-through wheels. Early ones have solid backed spokes (though I don't think they ever had the shallow version solid spokes) and a brown paxilon pick-up section with phosper bronze strips.

    • Informative/Useful 1
×
×
  • Create New...