Jump to content
 

Simond

Members
  • Posts

    6,918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Simond

  1. Fantastic news.  
     

     

    I do hope the trader (who should be praised for his initiative) was lucky enough to have paid by some means that identifies the seller.  

     

    And further, I hope the local constabulary are able to make further enquiries.

     

    atb

    Simon

     

    • Agree 16
  2. I have seen arrangements like this (maybe Liverpool docks?) where an intermediate floor had fold - out side guard rails and a sort of drawbridge that could fold down once the load had been hauled above it.  You could model this closed in the door recess, I guess?

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Hal Nail said:

    What door handles did you use - are they a good match? I was thinking of using the 4 supplied to fix one side then put 4 new ones on t'other!

     
    That’s a good idea, and probably worth doing.  
     

    I have a pack and a few Blacksmith ones left over from a coach building spree some years back, and used them.  They’re close, but slightly larger.

     

    re the dynamo, if I can find one in the bits box, that’ll be ideal, if not, I’ll measure one, model it on CAD and 3DP…. If I had / could find a drawing, that would be quicker still!

     

    cheers

    Simon

    • Like 3
  4. Done quite a bit to mine.  
     

    The number’s wrong (apparently 1270 was experimental, and had horizontal planks but I’ve not seen a photo to confirm this), and it’s missing two door handles on each side, along with the hand holes that you reach out of to open the door if you get shut in.  Drilled out the hand holes and added T handles as required.

     

    I’ve painted out the number on each side and will put new transfers on tomorrow or Wednesday.  Changed the couplings for Premier ones as the springs are far too weak, fitted battery boxes, trying to find a spare dynamo in my bits boxes, painted the wheels with track grime, and sprayed similar over the bogies, ends and lower sides, and gave the roof a gentle dusting of soot.

     

    it’s nice to personalise something like this.  I’m very pleased with it, despite a couple of fairly minor issues.  I’ve got a couple of Ian Kirk Siphons too.  Might get another one, make a train of it!

    • Like 4
  5. I felt that 5 sovereigns in 1905 must have been an impressive amount of money, but the Bank of England inflation calculator suggests it was "only" £495, so marginally more than a day return nowadays.

     

    https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator

     

    frankly I think the BoE calculator is not telling the whole truth...  If one assumed a constant 6% inflation, it would be more than £5440, and I imagine it would be possible to get a helicopter to Aylesbury for that.

    • Like 5
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 4
  6. 7 hours ago, magmouse said:

    This, I think. The strips going diagonally across the roof in Mike’s picture look too thin to resist much of a compression force, especially as they are curved.


    I agree.  I suspect we will have to assume some kind of cross-beams inside the roof.  Either directly beneath the strips, or “square on”.  I could imagine them being below the strips on the roof.
     

    Unless anyone has access to a container in a museum or similar to confirm or correct this, I guess we’ll not know, but at least, the good news is that it makes no difference to the models.

    • Like 4
  7. it’s good practice to use spreader bars when lifting stuff like this, to prevent the top collapsing inwards - the diagonal pull of ropes or chains in an “X” is not insignificant.  The actual force is dependent on the angles of the triangle and the weight.
     

    I see the nearer container in Mike’s post has some kind of reinforcement on the roof, perhaps to prevent the sides being forced in if spreaders were not used/available/commonplace, but that none of Nick’s photos show spreaders.  I guess the containers were built to be lifted without.

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  8. Well sorted, Mike.


    it’s a pretty reasonable assumption that the material should be /do “what it says on the tin”!

     

    For t’other side, if you cut the first 7 planks on each side as pairs from the same (7?) strips, then flip one of each over, they have to match - well, “have to” if the strips are consistent along their length.
     

    The ones that reach from top to bottom are less critical, though you’ll still need to be careful so they look right when you get to the ends.

     

    atb

    Simon

    • Like 2
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  9. That’s annoying.  Could you have a “strip sizer” made from brass that you can check the strip width on before going further?  You could go the whole hog, and fit a scalpel blade to plane the strip to size, but I reckon a bit of sharp glass paper on a piece of glass would do the needful.

     

    When did this kind of container traffic start?

     

    atb

    Simon

    • Like 1
  10. Dave, that’s really very sweet.  Beautiful work.  
     

    I guess mine would float, but I doubt for very long, and certainly not the right way up!

     

    Yours raises an interesting omission on mine, I’ve not fitted a doghouse to get down into the forepeak!  I’m sure I’d have included it had it been on the plans, and it’s daft that it’s not there.  Particularly as I included the decklights to give the crew a bit of illumination when the Tilley wasn’t lit.  Wouldn’t be too hard to make, though matching the paint at this distance in time may be a challenge.  
     

    Mike, sorry about the marine intermission!

     

    atb

    Simon

    • Like 2
  11. Looking good.

     

    I cannot recall when, but I do remember that there was an article on building one of those kits as a Black Maria in an MRJ some years back.  There might be some hints or tips that will help, in any case I think it was an interesting article.

     

     

    postscript.  
     

    There aren’t any “usual reasons” not to work in 7mm.  You just choose your model to suit your space.  It isn’t any more expensive than any other scale, on a £ per square metre basis either.

     

    enjoy!

    • Agree 2
  12. When we returned from our sojourn in India, all my modelling stuff was in storage, and all our other stuff was in a container somewhere on the high seas.  We were temporarily living in my late M-i-L’s house.  She had been quite keen on picture framing for self, friends & relations, so I was happy to find a cutting mat, lots of card and a few scalpels.  
     

    A bottle of good quality PVA glue, download plans, and the result was a 7mm Clyde Puffer.  Saved a good deal of thumb-twiddling.

     

    image.jpeg.c309cfbb116cb7828b1c6a1ba90f36f0.jpeg
     

    Some time after the above photo, it was blessed with a carvel dinghy, much fiddling with card, and more recently, it has acquired 3DP navigation lights, ventilators, binnacle and wheel.

    • Like 12
    • Round of applause 1
×
×
  • Create New...