Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

Mulgabill

Members
  • Posts

    1,344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mulgabill

  1. Sorry last post hiccuped and was sent, before I finished.

     

    A couple more pics (one before wasn't intended) then I'll try to make the laptop behave better, next time.

     

     

     

    1166248439_DSC_1492(2).JPG.8120db4a8ab55a22f4ba9685e01c88a6.JPG

     

    And the work underway

     

     

     

    467425192_DSC_1496(2).JPG.1d0897b5eb31ad4b7ca7f56022d88939.JPG

     

    I'll try to be back soon, honest

     

    TONY

    • Like 8
  2. Yet again, I had intended posting sooner.

     

    The photographers have managed to capture some unusual workings in the past quiet

    period, so will try to post.

     

    An unusual visitor brings in an engineers working, hope thats not bad news.

     

    1779587138_DSC_1489(2).JPG.9a13b19da0770d3fdba5d63f1784bdce.JPG

     

     

     

     

    647608872_DSC_1493(2).JPG.fd4d263597d8f3146a0901924739b7d5.JPG

    • Like 6
  3. A sidetrack for comment, especially if you know anything about signalling.

     

    Copied here is a note from my club, re signalling for the layout  we, well they, in my absence

    are working on.

     

    Gents,

    I've been taking some time while away to make a signalling plan for Gloucester London Road and have come up with the attached diagram. These are my proposals. The station gantry is under way anyway and the smaller one for the approach on the 'Up Main' is in situ without signals at the moment. 

     

    1393753871_2022_02_05_GMRCLayout_SignallingProject.jpg.120c4d76a0c02bc75c8fb379625144c5.jpg

     

    This was just to get some sort of plan in place based on my own understanding from what I've learned so far, also with some of Bill's help. I'm not sure about the two signals with feather type route indicators (on the far sides exiting the station) but at least wondered if two 'starters' might be appropriate before the gantry - perhaps with the shunt signals attached instead of at ground level in those cases. The route indicators might be too much given that there are already Theatres on the gantry a bit further on. For the main platforms I though the little 'OFF' indicators were appropriate ahead of the gantry - Banner Repeaters probably unnecessary in those instances. However, I thought one on the 'Down Main' might look good as an advance to the three aspect signal (around the curve at the tunnel entrance). The rest are ground signals, two of which are 'yellow/white' instead of red/white to allow for off main shunting.

     

    Of course, if I've cocked all this up I'm sure I'll hear soon. Let me know if you have other ideas guys or see any glaring errors. Plan attached in JPEG file. Apologies if I've missed anyone out or sent to someone I shouldn't on the distribution.

     

    I've not yet got my head around it, beyond No need for shunt sigs in sidings areas, as they are handlever operated. Just required out into station area.. My general impression is that there are perhaps more than we need e.g. not needing a home before the tunnel.

     

    Will try to have a proper look later, but would appreciate any input from you guys,

     

    Many thanks

     

    TONY

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  4. 10 hours ago, rodent279 said:

    Little more than a collection of glorified mobile classrooms if I remember rightly? At least, that's what they seemed like. They must have done the job though.

     

    An example of 12" : Ft Kit bashing, it was extended, without being to clever at covering the join!

     

    Also gave me many evening out with my girlfriend watching, sat in the car, a view that included

    Hymeks and Westerns, free of charge. Those were the days.

     

    Oh and she's still around, we progressed to evening picnics at Severn Tunnel Junc, after we were

    married, and the Hydrualics had gone.

     

    TONY

    • Like 6
  5. 38 minutes ago, KNP said:

    More work on PW train formation….

     

    This must one of the strangest looking wagons I have built….

     

    I present to you the sleeper wagon!

     

    3B645533-20C7-4ED6-BD67-1E36C2DED6FA.jpeg.ab7c2d65b440effcb32db88fc344ec94.jpeg

     

    It will be loaded with sleepers when painted…

     

    Next one to think about is a rail carrying wagon like a Macaw or similar!

     

     

     

    I too am in the middle of building one of these. (Picked it up for the princely

    sum of £3 last Summer). But I'm doing the later taunton concrete version.

     

    Trying to work out how to fit couplings,  any suggestion?

     

    Cheers

    TONY

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  6. 17 minutes ago, KNP said:

    Off we go again, let’s see what tomorrow brings???

     

     

    This isn't LM, Kevin.

     

    With AP on the job, it could all be done, and written up,

     

    .....by TEATIME.

     

    One Eyed TONY

    • Funny 3
  7. 1 hour ago, Andy Keane said:

    I have gone for the older Hornby R4319A / R4319B coaches which are not so nice but I think probably did run to Helston.

    Andy

     

    Yes I do have a pair in BR Maroon as the "normal" branch set, plus about half a dozen choc/cream for GW running or future detailing/improving. Although all of these are pre Hornby versions inc my 1st pair of Airfix original issue.

     

    TONY

    • Like 1
  8. 3 minutes ago, Andy Keane said:

    Though I guess the 57' bow-ended suburban stock never made it to Cornwall?

     

    Well this is where I have an advantage, presenting a cartoon. (ie rule 1), But at an early stage

    I did also refer to the layout having an alter ego - that of Helstonish on Severn.

     

    To date I have tended to find it difficult to envisage the layout as being anywhere but Cornwall,

    other than when I want to run some of my bigger locos. But one day I may get round to drawing

    up a Severnside based History / Timetable, which might justify some of the loco's I've acquired.

    (One work in progress is a spreadsheet of loco allocations for Bristol, Gloucester and Cornish

    sheds from BR database, to highlight locos which spent time across more than one area of interest.)

     

    The new rake will effectively at least upgrade the presentation, replacing an old mainline Midland

    set as the regular non corridor working.

     

     

    16 hours ago, Andy Keane said:

    Maybe somebody will be brave enough to replace the cab windows with glue and glaze?

     

    You are probably right, although thats unlikely to be me. I'm not that brave.

     

    I will probly fix the other irritation that I omitted from the above. ie the steamheat pipes

    which vaguely point horizontally under the buffers, front and back, which will need

    "clipping" to a bracket on the buffer, I think.

     

     

    TONY

    • Like 1
  9. 12 hours ago, St Enodoc said:

    I think you put the RH comps on the right and the LH comps on the left...

     

    Always happy to help.

     

    Yes, thats exactly what I have done.

     

    But the comps can be turned 180 deg, so there is a choice to be made.

     

    From what little differences I can see, I think the choice is, do I group

    the first sections together at the centre, or  the comps?

     

    Must admit I've not yet looked at GWR.Org

     

    Good to know I'm not the only one who doesn't immediately have the answer.

     

    TONY

    • Like 1
    • Friendly/supportive 2
  10. 1735812319_DSC_1484(2).JPG.5bf8236a039ff7adf7de51bf19c0b3d1.JPG

     

    Well the verdict on the Model Rail 16XX, with lot's of caveats.

     

    ie this is just my impression, and I have no pretense to really knowing what I'm looking for,

    and, at the moment whether I could see  it, if I did.

     

    I like it's running qualities, both in terms of speed, and control, but also it's ability to stay on

    all of my trackwork.  The details are generally nicely done, and I particularly  the reverser rods.

     

    Dislikes - the join across the bunker, which everybody was moaning about, but I can live with.

    especially once I have painted, and fitted the fire irons etc. A bigger disappointment for me is the cabfront windows, which catch and reflect the light, shouting plastic. Not sure of the answer to that.

     

    Overall however I am very happy with my first new purchase since probably the Lima 94xx when it was first intoduced.

     

    Now I need to work out how to put together a new branch set, how do I get the RH / LH comps the right way round  ?????

     

     

    TONY

  11. On 23/01/2022 at 21:00, gwrrob said:

    Don’t blame me for your 16xx purchase but I’m interested in your thoughts on the model Tony.

     

    Good to hear from you, Robin.

     

    I do have a few thoughts, but will give a more considered answer, tomorrow.

     

    Does  look nice on the Porthleven goods.

     

    272475213_DSC_1481(3).JPG.097146afd8c60ce54f0ec91cf47f6f8f.JPG

     

     

    However, I do have to question the sense of asking a one eyed bloke, who sees

    things as a cartoon, at the best of times.

     

    TONY

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  12. 512938285_DSC_1745(2).JPG.44d29dcea59add3903a67212957b3c33.JPG

     

    WSR Mogul 9351 heads away from Blue Anchor, Light Engine, Minehead - Williton 4 Jan 2022

     

    This working left the WSR with 1 steam loco available, as the line was again about to be cut, again,

    for track renewal between Dunster and Minehead. Also it left me available for last weeks eye op!

     

    All seems to have gone ok, but it's an experience I am in no hurry to repeat. Currently there seems

    a little improvement each day, but not without a price. I have managed to walk into the wardrobe a

    couple of times, and have a cut on the forehead to prove it. It also required either sitting at a table,

    and laying forward, face down, or face down on a bed, for 2 x 3hr sessions a day. To manipulste

    the gas pressure! And with only one eye working, no driving.

     

    Modelling would be nice, but there's no time, it's like being back in full time work, and no pay.

     

    However there have been some "arrivals" so, thanks in no small part to Robins Sweets' prompt

    hereabouts, this arrived just before Christmas. Must be on loan from Swindon.

     

    DSC_1501.JPG.298e3e96ced5b60859507f7571a50a18.JPG

     

    DSC_1502.JPG.c80731ea8d98177c1cf69b04a48a49ae.JPG

     

    And another parcel arrived from my new friends at Kernow, yesterday. Pics to follow shortly,

    I hope.

     

    TONY

    1328370507_DSC_1745(4).JPG.65691672361958734a326e3c4fba0b7d.JPG

    • Friendly/supportive 6
  13. 2 hours ago, Captain Kernow said:

    Really?

     

    You've already got examples from Hornby, Heljan and Dapol!

     

    Sorry - I think my offhand remark missed the target, somewhat.

     

    I was referring to the acronym, giving the word B O A T.

     

    As for 1000s you're off the mark, Cap'n

                all mine are Lima, or Lilliput !!!!!!

     

     

    TONY

    • Like 1
    • Friendly/supportive 3
  14. 12 hours ago, Andy Keane said:

     

    Some while back, I was looking for a Cambrian Kit. (Inspired by the allocation of  a crane to Little

    Muddle). However there were seemingly none available at the time.

     

    The Bachmann is a beauty, but a bit of overkill. At that price I would have to relay Helstonish,

    on a weekly basis.

     

    In the meantime I have a done a bit of work on a Triang Hornby version, which has come out well

    enough to stand in for the time being.

     

    I'll perhaps look out for the the kit, after my eye op, and once my modelling efforts come back

    to reasonably productive standards.

     

    TONY

  15. Happy New Year to all who visit here, and hopefully Helstonish also.

     

    My feeling, I have no real evidence, is that the branch would likely have an allocated brake van.

    This as there were a few branch freights timetabled, plus trailing loads on mixed trains, all of

    which, I think would be re-formed at Gwinear Road. After all GR was extended and was a fairly

    substantial yard in it's own right, and would despatch further afield, in more substantial

    formations.

     

    That's not to say that goods working couldn't work, in or out, further afield. What it would do

    is facilitate the branch workings.

     

    With regard the coal chute, I would expect it to be more substantial than the Minffordd one, as

    there would be more drop. Again I have no evidence, but would suspect it would be similar to

    the serpentine loading chute, but perhaps with wooden framing. A, as it would have been an

    earlier build, than the oft pictured stone chute. Of course it could be have been rather more

    cobbled together, as the covered coal "sheds" near the goods shed were.

     

    Looking forward to more good progress here in 22, as well, I hope on Helstonish, just to

    keep up with the Jones Keane.

     

    All the best

    TONY

     

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...