Jump to content
 

5BarVT

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    3,951
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 5BarVT

  1. "in advance" and "in rear" is confusing . . . assumed that "in rear" was what was behind (i.e. after) the signal as the train approached it, and "in advance" meant somewhere that the train got to before the signal. 

    Even 'behind' can be used differently depending on circumstances: if out on the track and asked to stand behind a signal I would be looking at the back of it, however if I was talking about a train going behind a signal (to reverse being unstated) the driver would be looking at the front of it (having changed ends).

    I understand that one of the difficulties with 'in advance' is that track colleagues use it to mean looking into the toes of the points so that for a trailing set it is the same as the operating use but for a facing set it is the opposite.

    No wonder there is confusion!

    Paul.

    • Like 1
  2. would there be a wooden fence around behind the Buffers, but leaving access to the Signals?

    A railway must be fenced off, but only at the outer boundary. Since privatisation, that has led to fences between NR and other depots that didn't exist under BR, so don't regard current practice as what would have been the case in the 70's. I don't think there would have been a fence, but I stand to be corrected.

    Paul.

  3. WR had standard circuits for one pull (no track circuits), one train (tracked beyond starting signal), one train with track clear (tracked up to starting signal) all done at the receiving (non pegging) end. One acceptance (Welwyn control) was a 4 P.O. Relay box at the sending (pegging) end. All worked over a single line wire with earth return. I think the circuits are still available.

     

    Edit to add: all of the above is only to prevent signalmen from forgetting about trains and ending up with two in the block. If the whole block is visible, and it's only a model 'by instruction' is perfectly adequate.

     

    Paul.

  4. Looks good Andy. As others have also said, I think you will enjoy it. It reminds me a bit of a Thornton Fields Carriage Sidings with the buffers almost at right angles to the running lines, so even prototypical in its arrangement.

    Paul.

  5. The two distant signals that can be seen are for Benton Quarry Junction. As shown, the line is clear through Benton Quarry for the ECML. I'm fairly certain the LH distant will be worked as it would not need to be provided if fixed (unless someone knowledgeable in NE signalling knows better) and will be to indicate that the signals at Benton Quarry are cleared round to Benton Station. I would expect the RH signal to be a distant too and it looks like it is: that will indicate signals off round towards Backworth.

    Paul.

  6. Ed,

    I lost your thread in the move, but have found it now.

    post-27044-0-56860800-1505653535_thumb.jpg

    As you can see, a three platform minories, with above the third platform a parcels platform and siding. An arriving parcels can run straight in (or into the passenger platform), a departing parcels is made up and placed in the top passenger platform for departure.  I have added a loco release crossover in the platforms - this works for short trains, but longer expresses are taken out by a new train loco.  To give an idea of scale, the bars below are 12" and 3" in OO.

    Paul.

  7. Yes, it was still called the School of Transport then, only becoming the Railway Engineering School a few years later. A bit like boarding school - we had to stand when the Principal (Leslie James) entered the dining hall and we were allocated a silver napkin ring complete with napkin, which lasted for the whole week.

    I'd forgotten about the napkin rings - thanks for the memory. I worked there 84-88 when Charles Underhill was in charge - he took us on an outing to Tees Yard and Thornaby depot in the induction week, so he may have taken over by then too.

    Remember the dodgy emergency alarm and the poor soul who was allocated follow up each one overnight?

    Paul.

    • Like 1
  8. Today I clocked up my 43rd anniversary of working in the rail industry.

    Congratulations. 42 years two weeks ago yesterday for me. WR S&T started their trainees two weeks before BRB that year (get the regional loyalty in early?!). So 42 years ago today I would have been sitting in the lecture theatre at the ex LMS training school in Derby.

    what I'm going to do when I grow up - I tell them that I don't know yet...

    Ditto!

    Anyway, when I got back from Melbourne this week these were waiting for me:

    Really nice. I have seen their site before, just need to get round to deciding what I want on mine.

    Paul.

    • Like 1
  9. Thanks for the help! I am still going to want help on the goods yard.

    I have a plan for what is essentially an extended minories.  I want shunting so I am using parcels traffic to give that.  Newcastle 1970's certainly had enough moving of parcels stock to justify what I'm intending to do.

    Paul.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...