Jump to content
 

LBRJ

Members
  • Posts

    1,102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LBRJ

  1. I must confess that adverts do not often bother me either way (though those pop up ones can be a bit gear-grinding on occasion).

     

    The "secret" is to click them away and tell google why....then, eventually, you get lots of adverts that are very much more your thing...

    Unless of course ...cough cough ;)

  2. 12 minutes ago, Andy Kirkham said:

    No sign of any diesel electrics at all. Did that reflect the actual situation at Exeter, or do we suspect cameraman's bias?

     

    And how common was it to see Class 22s on passenger services?

    Probably a bit of both in the choice of subjects.

     

    Not that there would be all that many Peaks and 47s knocking about around Exeter in 1969.

    I think the D6300s were pretty common on Devon local services.

    • Like 1
  3. I saw an article earlier this week on the matter, and it suggested that "The Authorities" decided CO2 / pollution levels were getting a bit high, so they literally just pulled the plug!

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  4. I always thought that your line manager was your manager, IE in charge of you, and so on up the tree.

    Presumably this is to stop people like the aforementioned "manager fresh from Tie Rack" thinking that they are in charge of you.

  5. 4 hours ago, melmerby said:

    Yes

    A layout based on Fenland - the epitome of flat baseboards!

     

     A Fenland based layout would be just about diametrically opposite to a flat earth baseboard. 

    The railway would very possibly be the highest point in the landscape.

     

    More On Topic, I have seen maybe half a dozen "build a layout" type films on YouTube...

    That is more than enough for me ta...

     

    Conversely, a lot of the ones that I  do see on matters related to joinery, woodwork and general construction (particularly  those from north America, where they do things a whole lot of different) are often very educational or thought provoking or at the very least entertaining.

     

  6. 1 hour ago, Captain Kernow said:

    The last few photos are superb enough, but the first two are so realistic, I simply cannot tell the difference. I think these might be the most realistic model photos I have ever seen.

     

     I would have to agree there CK, and for once, I think the colour shot is as good as the B&W one - its got that atmosphere thing down perfectly.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 3
    • Thanks 1
  7. Not really too far Off Topic here..

    But, for those who like 59s and lack space I do recall seeing one in the late 90s with just 3 wagons in tow - They may have been TTA type oil tanks.

    I only really remember it 'cos at the time it struck me as being a very short train for a very big engine!

    • Like 1
  8. 17 hours ago, phil-b259 said:

     

    A builder my parents engaged put it thus 'I use whats easiest to work with'

     

    If dealing with very small measurements the metric unit of mm is far easier to handle than fractions of an inch. On the other hand 6ft is easier to remember than 1.8288m.

     

    In other words keeping the number of digits and decimal places as low as is necessary!

     

    That is exactly what I do too - use whichever suits the application.

    Keep the numbers small and manageable for mental arithmetic.

     

    I do laugh a bit when I look at Yuotube etc and see US Framers and Builders jump through hoops to multiply or even just add, obscure fractional measurements though

    • Agree 1
  9. 22 hours ago, St Enodoc said:

    The Chapel Siding is level but I have to disagree regarding the branch. It definitely falls from Par to St Blazey. At its steepest the gradient is 1 in 56 according to Network Rail's track gradients database, although not for very far.

     

    As I said , it is to all intent flat.

    There is a very slight up grade from Par station to the foot-crossing, and then a very slight down grade towards St Bz.

    The 1:56 is the absolute ruling gradient over that section of line.

    Trust me here, I have walked along  it enough times to know it is as close to flat as matters not.

     

    Much more on topic, I am itching to see how Bute Road (alight here for the Eden Project) develops.

     

    Some years ago, there actually was a proper bus connection from Roche station through to Eden, though I dont know how long that ever lasted.....

     

    • Informative/Useful 3
  10. 18 hours ago, St Enodoc said:

    The branch falls towards St Blazey. The main lines rise from Par in both directions.

    The branch round the curve from Par to St Bz is flat (or as good as) as is the now very overgrown Chapel Siding. 

    That gives a good idea of how steep the climb out of Par on the Down actually is; which is about 1in 60. The line up the Luxulyan valley is as steep as 1:37, so plenty of grunt needed to get up to Goonbarrow and beyond!!

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 3
×
×
  • Create New...