Jump to content
 

Iain.d

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    328
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Iain.d

  1. 1 hour ago, Dave John said:

    Just for comparison this is Halfords Vauxhall Burgundy red. Slightly deeper in hue than the Ford version. I think it should be a bit purpler, but closest match from a rattle can. 

     

    883393806_gcsred.JPG.d9e599b4cdc5e5bc809056c8bb734f27.JPG

     

    Mind you, I had to drink lots of Burgundy before deciding........ 

     

    That looks superb!

     

    kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. 2 hours ago, polybear said:

     

    Very nice - you must be one of the cleanest solderers known to Man, or very good at cleaning up! :smile_mini2:

     

    Thanks! 

     

    I don't have much of a soldering philosophy, I use the smallest bit a job will allow and the least amount of solder I can get away with on the bit.  I learned the basics from reading Ian Rice's Etched Loco Construction in the early 90s. For soldering brass with 145 or 188 degree solder I have three bits: small (~1.2mm tip), medium (~2mm tip) (rarely used) and big (~3mm tip). On the Stove R I used the small bit for the hinges, drop lights, door stops, body fixing nuts and brake gear. I used the big bit for joining the sides to the ends, doing the solebars and the headstocks. I have a cheap Chinese soldering iron station with a temperature control, but what the digital display displays is probably not accurate - I generally have it set on 365 degrees for brass work, occasionally going a little higher, and 200 degrees (its lowest displayed setting) for whitemetal.  I don't think the accuracy of 'my setting' is that important, I think it's all kind of relative, it's more a case of knowing the iron and making small changes to the temperature as each task is slightly different - it depends how much the brass sucks the heat away from the tip. To some that may seem somewhat rudimentary and agricultural and I'm aware there are some good videos available explaining in some detail the temperatures that one should use but my method works for me.

     

    As to cleaning, I do scrub the brass with Jif and a toothbrush after most soldering sessions. On the Stove R above you can see it hasn't yet been scrubbed because my fingerprints are all over it!  Sometimes I use too much solder or too much flux (the solder will flow to wherever the flux is) and it can sometimes blob or run a bit. On the top left hand hinge of the door above you can see where the solder flowed through the hole the hinge comes through and onto the body side. I carefully filed off the excess, sometimes I use a scapel blade to scrape the excess off. I have never used one of those solder wick things. I think its always easier to add a bit more solder/flux/heat than it is to take it off.  I still believe I have a fair way to go with soldering, I certainly haven't mastered the art of it -  I'm a shocker when it comes to trying to sweat stuff together!! I might even reach for the glue, but I wouldn't say that too loudly around here....

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 8
    • Informative/Useful 6
  3. I use a Nikon Coolscan 5 for my slides / negative strips. The software it came with no longer works with current Windows or Mac OS; I use Vuescan (paid for, once, which gives a perpetual licence) to operate it. It has an adaptor that does 35mm negative strips, in batches of six, and a slide adaptor for single scans. The quality is about as good as you can get for a top end (considered by most) amateur scanner.

     

    I scan everything at 4000dpi and maximum scan area, I used the lowest in built cleaning setting. The images scan at about 70Mb as a TIFF, tidied up and cropped they’re about 60Mb - I think a lot of the scan data is noise as a comparable sized image from a digital SLR is about half the file size

     

    1000+ slides or negatives will take a long time, particularly if you set everything to maximum scan quality etc, and then of course there’s the processing of the scans….

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 1
    • Agree 5
  4. That's nice, but I'm not sure its 'right' for a UK based layout. As far as I know/remember, EOD / IEDD is done by the Royal Logistic Corps and Royal Engineers, only London has a police bomb disposal unit.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 5
    • Agree 2
    • Informative/Useful 2
  5. Towards the end of last year, I started rebuilding a heavily damaged DJH 7F that I bought from eBay in 2013. On stripping the whole thing down – it was glued together – I wondered if it had ever actually run; I think not as there were no pickups to the loco’s motor (a Portescap) nor did it look as though any had ever been fitted. But the tender has ‘run’ because there are significant wheel wear marks on the whitemetal on the inside of the chassis.

     

    1127437378_DJH-SD7F-53800(05)-TenderSubChassisComponenets-StrippedDown.jpg.91ede37803e16064a675db6d74126e20.jpg

     

    I decided to start rebuilding the tender so put together a Comet tender chassis and fit that. The chassis as supplied needed shortening by quite a few mm at each end to fit the whitemetal body. I had to relocate the guard irons (twice!), first as part of the shortening of the frames and then again to allow the fitting of the removable brake gear. At the moment the original wheels are being re-used but I think I’ll replace them with Gibson’s.

     

    1245975998_DJH-SD7F-53800(08)-Tender.jpg.91e28b04f7055026be128ea2bf3f49a3.jpg

     

    I made up a set of tender pick-ups, although I’m not sure if they’ll be required on an eight coupled loco but at least they’re done if the need arises. There’s not a lot of room between the frames and I removed quite a lot of whitemetal from the inside of the tender to avoid electrical shorts and allow the wheels some lateral movement. Also the front fixing for the sub chassis is raised to allow the pickups to have clearance below.

     

    1171189576_DJH-SD7F-53800(10)-Tender.jpg.b04e34c180083da2539232d1723ebbcd.jpg

     

    I need to think have a think about the coupling method to the loco and how I’m going to finish off the front end. I have to file a new rear coal plate from brass strip, fit a tool box and water filler.

     

    1692436603_DJH-SD7F-53800(11)-Tender.jpg.617dcb7431c1e5c92be16605c946709b.jpg

     

    I filled the two (massively oversize) holes for the brake handle and water scoop (not needed) on the footplate with some solder and whitemetal off cuts and smoothed off the excess. I will use a bit more filler around the old handrail holes and along the back of the tender to tidy things up. Brass steps will replace the original whitemetal ones -  the drag beam will likely be brass to help secure the front ones. So far, a very enjoyable few hours of modelling over the last couple of weeks.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 14
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
  6. 4 hours ago, daveyb said:

    I did some work there in 96 and 07-09.  It was used a both an experiment ground and a disposal station for a long time and had a very extensive standard gauge system and a collection of narrow gauge sections.  It even had it's own passenger services in the really busy post war period.

     

    After being MOD PE&E as mentioned above, it came under the wider Royal Armaments Research and Development Establishment (RARDE) name and later still was renamed something more closely related to its actual role, like other sectors.  With the Govt of the 80s and 90s pushing to contractor and privatise a lot of things, the Govt agencies saw RARDE split into various bits  Showburyness and the other test ranges at Eskmeals, BUTIC, Larkhill, West Freugh, etc fell under the banners or Defence Evaluation and Testing Organisation (DETO) or Defence Experimental Research Agency (DERA) DETO was supposed to test for DERA and then bill internally whilst still all being inside the Civil Service but under the control of the agency SERCO (the civil SERvice COmpany).  This was all before it was privatised.  SERCO was also split for sale and when it actually became privatised it had to tender to run its own establishments!  Another subsection of SERCO was sold off under the name Qinetiq.  Qinetiq later took over the running of Shoeburyness and even later bought it.

     

    The MoD still sends significant amounts of unserviceable ammunition to Shoeburyness for contract disposal by Qinetiq (we send it back all the way from Canada rather than use local arrangements - apparently it is a global contract so global stacks must be shipped back), including fired brass from the ranges which is burnt to confirm all energetic material is destroyed before the scrap is sold to smelters.

     

    The line into Shoeburyness used to be a fairly innocuous looking single loop to the south side of the terminus build at Shoeburyness station, crossing the road just in front of the the station build through big wooden level crossing gates (that had not been closed in years even in 1996), that road led to Artillery Barracks which was a coastal fort and is now houses.  Once across the road there was an access control gate through which the single track led to the exchange sidings.  Those access siding were more commonly full of stock for disposal during my visits and that could be seen from the road.  The siding behind were where the various VAA/VDA and VGA wagons were received and marshalled by whichever Steelman/ Thomas Hill / other MoD shunter was there at the time.  There was some 20ft iso container traffic too (RCTU or RLCU full side opening types), but I don't remember any PFAs only a few FGA type skeleton flat rakes.

     

      The railway was much foreshortened in the 90s & 00s and the various gates and bridges to Foulness Island were out of use, but you could still make out how each of the ranges had been served at some point.

     

    I doubt any of this is of any use but it brought back some happy memories.

    That’s a pretty comprehensive summary from that time; I visited / worked there quite a few times between late 1995 and early 1997.  I don’t recall much being transported by rail at that time, all our stock for disposal was delivered by road.

     

    We would destroy munitions on the sand flats off Foulness Island when the tide was out. The tide never seemed to be fully out – there was always a thin covering of water so it was very difficult to see the holes left by the exploded munitions, which quickly filled with water, so we would mark the holes with big wooden crosses (like a WW2 beach obstacle) and hope we would be able to see the hole, and where it was in relation to the marker, next time we went on the sands. More than one person fell in hole!

     

    Working there between Nov and Feb with the wind blowing off the North Sea was bitterly cold.

     

    I remember the rail yard ‘behind the wire’ and seeing a variety of wagons (never a loco), and now regret that I had plenty of opportunity to take photos, only didn’t. I did take this though:

     

    712255071_Capture3(2).JPG.c7fc9ac02123ae1926e1f8e72fcc9dba.JPG

     

    Its from the top of the beach near where we used to stay, on what was the old barracks – our accommodation was usually the building next to the beach at the end of Chapel Road.

     

    Sorry, like daveyb’s post above – probably not much use other than a nice trip down memory lane for me!

    • Like 9
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  7. 3 hours ago, Headstock said:

     

    Good evening Ian,


    don't give up, it's a nice build of one of the most common types of wagon built in this country but not seen a lot on model railways. However, it is not the most likely type of wagon to be found in an engineers train, especially in your time period. It's a turn of the century PO coal wagon, there was a mass culling of such  wagons in the early years of Nationalization, you might consider departmental black? 


    Believe it or not, 16' wagons of this type made up the bulk of the PO mineral wagon fleets, easily outnumbering the later 1923 17' RCH design. The results of the Great depression stopped the 1923 design usurping the older shorter wagons. The 17' 6'' length was usually reserved for the later types of General merchandise wagons.
     

     

    Thank you for that, and the information about this type of wagon, I do admit my knowledge gap of wagons is vast.

     

    There was no history of the wagon with the kit instructions although it did say (paraphrased) it could make a 10T or 12T example, depending on the axle diameter.

     

    So now knowing a bit more, I’m less inclined to ‘lose’ it in an engineering or departmental train. I’m now more inclined to either paint it in PO livery of one of the Somerset Coalfield collieries circa 1920 (I’ll do a bit of research) or as a tired PO wagon circa 1950ish.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 2
    • Informative/Useful 1
  8. On 23/01/2022 at 16:23, jwealleans said:

    I remember seeing that WSM kit and being briefly tempted.... then I remembered how awful their C1 kit was.   I'll be interested to see how it turns out.

    The build of my WSM 7 plank PO wagon is complete.

     

    1548414836_WSM7PlankPO(03).jpg.140907d7851d5108f0e34eea3270742e.jpg

     

    It wasn’t hard but it was certainly awkward.  The main brass is 20 thou thick and the part etched lines for the folds needed some heavy filing to open them up or the bends, when made, would never have been 90 degrees. Also, for the soldering everything needed to be done with the biggest bit I have, with the iron at max temperature, this of course meant that some bits became unsoldered as I tried to add other bits…

    The only glued on bits are the axle boxes. The brass got so dirty – it literally tarnished before my eyes!

     

    Rather than just solder the chassis side frames to the underside of the body, I decided to solder an offcut of brass between the chassis sides so I could get the axles all square and free running first, then I tack soldered the whole chassis to the underside of the floor.

     

    1037032499_WSM7PlankPO(04).jpg.88411b326078e82f5a3dfc2e46b62732.jpg

     

    I have no idea why a hole is etched through the drop side door – I’m aware when some wagons were re-purposed, holes were cut in the sides to prevent over filling with dense materials. I don’t think that’s the case here. Additionally, to my eye the proportions look wrong; it looks too short for its height (it's 64mm/16ft over the headstocks), other open wagons I have equal about 17ft/17ft 6in.  It’ll be finished in grey, with 3 link couplings, and added to my engineer’s train. And it needs some door banger stop things.

     

    10325309_WSM7PlankPO(05).jpg.65e9eb44cca3c5ac322e5adb8f612576.jpg

     

    Did I enjoy the build? No, not really.  Would I buy/do another one? No….never…!

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 3
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
    • Funny 1
    • Friendly/supportive 7
  9. 3 hours ago, uax6 said:

    It would be interesting to know how many on here have more than just railway modelling as a hobby... 

    ....  

     

    Andy G

     

    My second hobby is landscape/seascape photography -

     

    Capture1.JPG.3dd16c223f858c694dfad959191dcd9d.JPG

     

    Third hobby is kayaking -

     

    Capture2.JPG.cecd85318160cf74056b00d7aab13e97.JPG

    (Apologies for the wonky horizon (but I wasn't the photographer, mind you, with it being me in the kayak, you probably worked that bit out...!))

     

    Plus travelling as a hobby, which is a bit curtailed at the moment.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 17
  10. The Ratio wagon has a multitude of faults. Some easy to correct, others less so.  With what I have learned since completing mine (off RMweb) – its about 8mm too short and 3mm too wide! The bogies while based on a prototype are far from accurate.

     

    For the bolsters I glued them (complete) to the sides then chopped off the plastic stanchion and carefully drilled out the sockets and inserted .5mm brass wire. I could and should have made some sort of shackle representation. I carved off the side loops and bent some brass .5mm wire into a loop, drilled the holes in the side, threaded on a chain loop and secured it with a spot of glue behind the frame/solebar.

     

    174266857_Ratio-GWRBogieBolsterA(01).jpg.4b8c83cecc885af46de7d62effda13dc.jpg

     

    I discarded the plastic truss rods and used .5mm brass for the rods and .8mm tube for the queen posts.

     

    492837125_Ratio-GWRBogieBolsterA(02).jpg.7745a2efd57a21ab535ef6a68f70e086.jpg

     

    There's about 80gm of, cut to size, lead sheet on the underside for weight. The floor didn't line up so the gap is covered with a shim of plastic card.

     

    732279740_Ratio-GWRBogieBolsterA(03).jpg.90a1006ad2a09fb2a2c58048867076eb.jpg

     

    Buffers are from Lanarkshire Model Supplies. Wheels by Hornby.

     

    1058274307_Ratio-GWRBogieBolsterA(04).jpg.1c7097c5a47efc6af2c30d56ef20ccc0.jpg

     

    Some chopped up matchstick to represent old dunnage and a couple of Roxey shackles.  I will add some chain when I get it. Home produced transfers - I guessed the design and location from internet searches and looking at RTR wagons.

     

    991496414_Ratio-GWRBogieBolsterA(05).jpg.aa69d3524dea8c3b17f51a270a320882.jpg

     

    If doing another one – highly unlikely – I would try and correct the length and width issues and use the Wizard stanchions.

     

    All that said, I’m happy with mine, I think it looks okay.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 6
    • Craftsmanship/clever 10
  11. 56 minutes ago, LNER4479 said:

    Here's a sight that'll gladden a few hearts.

     

    20220101_225349.jpg.9e09f64c13d5263298f2ae9916f2b4a6.jpg

    I do have - ahem - rather too many of these squashed LMS vans so I've come over all Clive and going to have a go at creating one out of two. The spare chassis thus released will come in useful as I've got a few of the old 1970s Mainline chassis that ought to be consigned to history. My recently built ABS LMS van is there for reference. I'll let you know how I get on...

     

     

    I saw the cut red(ish) wagons, the red on the work surface and the saw.... and for a moment, I thought you'd had a terrible accident...!

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Funny 9
  12. I have found quite a few of the previous posts on ratios of different railway company stock being prevalent in a particular part of the country quite interesting – certainly not something I have spent much time considering previously.

     

    I showed the wagons I completed this year a few pages back - a very generic bunch of stock.  I like doing wagons as background projects and time fillers with many of the individual tasks not taking very long at all - I can often break up building them into 10 or 15 minutes chunks of time.

     

    On the clutter of my work bench today there are three more wagons under construction: two BR ‘Conflat As’ and an LNER ‘Conflat S’.

     

    429517859_ModelBenchDec21.jpg.bad26fe1f2f04dea4fb50230dbf8f82c.jpg

     

    Don Rowland, in British Railway Wagons (p136), states ‘there was one container wagon for every fifteen wagons in 1967 compared with one for every sixty-five wagons twenty years previously’. If I think about this in proportion to what I might end up with as stock on my future layout and its intended timeline, I don’t think I’ll be building anymore conflats, as much as I like them! Probably need lots more mineral opens and box vans though.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 9
    • Informative/Useful 1
  13. 14 hours ago, WagonWorks said:

    Superb models and finish!

    Just a thought - I would have expected the kitchen to be marshalled between the two dining sections unless there is a reason for them to be as in the picture.

    Thanks! Yes, you’re right about the marshalling - I just haven’t made the coupling for the Third Open yet.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Iain

    • Like 1
  14. 5 hours ago, Chas Levin said:

    Iain, thank you for posting, especially the above close-up which shows those superb fabric curtains to great effect: they look so much better than painted / metal / card / other stuff ones. I shall definitely be using fabric in future curtain production too.

     

    Merry Christmas to you too, and to everyone! :)

    Thanks very much Chas!

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...