Jump to content
 

MikeTrice

Members
  • Posts

    3,254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MikeTrice

  1. 37 minutes ago, jwealleans said:

    I added jumper cables and the dimension plate to the end.   I'm not really sure why they aren't cast in.  Maybe Mike can comment?

    They were done over 22 years ago. I cannot recall why certain decisions were made at the time.

  2. Following on from my earlier post about reprofiling the original Kirk ends I have made some further adjustments. My filed beading has been removed from the top along with some of the moulded in beading. A new top cornice has been added and the now mising end beading replaced with 0.5mm rod. A dimension plate and jumper cables have also been added.

    20230619_084627.jpg.e7e958f86dfe561a7897b77a9d4e4f2f.jpg

    • Like 4
    • Craftsmanship/clever 6
  3. Some earlier posters have commented on the incorrect roof profile where the ex-Kirk 61'6" Gresley's are concerned. To me this has always made them stand out a mile and I can spot one in an instant.

     

    In the past I have successfully cross kitted Kirk sides with an MJT roof and cast ends. One thing I have never tried, until now, is the obvious one of modifying the Kirk mouldings themselves.

     

    So as a starting point here is a Kirk end against a scaled GA drawing:

    IMG_7113.JPG.5d121791ee2330459fa0c7f20d58418a.JPG

     

    Note how much shorter this is which results in a too short corridor connector and when viewed from the side too big a curve to the roof.

     

    The first step was to build up the height of the end with styrene. I used Evergreen .080" x .156":

    IMG_7114.JPG.4bb6b4ac0053083712048ff762a2cd8f.JPG

     

    The addition was then filed back to the correct shape including at this point the end beading:

    IMG_7120.JPG.6d665d79196083ddc07f89d62f7e55a5.JPG

     

    Now I have a confession to make. I should have included in the above modification the cornice that edges the roof. I managed to find one single Kirk end and some pre-used sides that I could just about cobble together to prove if this approach works, however I decided at this point ot print out using my FDM printer some replacement ends rather than use my last Kirk original.

     

    The carriage body was then assembled after filing back the moulding draft along the top edge, adding a piece of 20thou styrene to restore the height of the side and cutting back the supplied roof to fit behind the extended ends:

    IMG_7127.JPG.76b26071bdfa58ab9c2f02c30bd61f1e.JPG

     

    IMG_7129.JPG.1d49e0d0b7797c73ddbf7921baadb3e4.JPG

     

    IMG_7130.JPG.3ebd3f0ae40aca76ae3346c23e33d085.JPG

     

    The joint between the cut back supplied roof and extended ends was then filled with Milliput and sanded smooth. The transformation is obvious and the side profile is much improved in the process:

    IMG_7135.JPG.d36d67d31c0cfac87f917084f188f455.JPG

     

    IMG_7136.JPG.7bf283c1a64360c3836b1de5cfebcadc.JPG

     

    IMG_7138.JPG.26618553dfa03fe032d5fe1e9f77b07a.JPG

     

    Yes I cheated by using a new coach end, however I have proved that it is perfectly viable to modify the supplied Kirk mouldings to correct the most glaring error in the kits.

     

    Hopefully one day the new owners might be in a position to retool the roofs and ends to make this unnecessary.

    • Like 3
    • Craftsmanship/clever 9
    • Round of applause 3
×
×
  • Create New...