Jump to content
 

PMP99

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PMP99

  1. 29 minutes ago, Andrew Young said:

    @PMP99 the buildings look great and sit well along the back. I’ve built a few Petite Properties buildings now. Have found them enjoyable to build and speeds the build up a bit. 
     

    Cheers,

    Andrew

    Yes, I think it was on your thread I first saw them. Even being low relief I still had to reduce the depth of them by about 50% and couldn’t make full use of extra fittings like porches, in my limited space.

    They certainly give a good starting point though.

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  2. First post for a while as much of the winter project was making new low-relief buildings for the back of the layout.

    In a further change I scrapped the couple of scratchbuilt attempts I had made.

    Instead the replacements are mostly modified ‘Petite Properties’ items, the exceptions being the scratch built factory at the left hand end and the ‘Skytrex’ factory at the right hand end.

     

    IMG_3759.jpeg

    IMG_3758.jpeg

    • Like 8
  3. On 31/01/2024 at 13:52, MikeParkin65 said:

    Wonder if its a new (unwelcome) policy or just an error of omission? Can anyone confirm whether models from the latest batch apart from 9466 include plates?

    I purchased 9481  (35-026A) last week.   No etched plates

    • Agree 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  4. 21 minutes ago, Ian Hargrave said:

    Now available for viewing on Rails website is Railroad Plus R 30319 . 14XX .Plus what exactly ? 

    Plus another £10 on the price I expect? 😐

    • Agree 1
    • Round of applause 1
    • Funny 1
  5. 37 minutes ago, Hal Nail said:

    It may just be an optical illusion but the smokeboxes and boiler taper seem quite different between the two in those pics: Dapol smokebox looks narrower diameter. Maybe its just the matt paint catching the light differently?


    Just tried to do a very quick check with the vernier and the smokebox diameter is pretty similar, Dapol may be slightly narrower but difficult for me to measure accurately.

    Not sure how much can be read from my photos at that angle, however I think it was established a while back that the Dapol boiler taper isn’t quite right.  It was explored at length on the Dapol Manor thread.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 2
  6. 2 hours ago, 57xx said:

     

    Regarding these two items:

    - the buffers are far too heavily sprung to be of any practical use, they might as well be solid.

    - To reveal a blocked off hole. In doing so, we're given oversize hinges and on mine, the lid is wonky*. I think it would have been nicer just moulded correctly.

     

    *There's a few other QC issues on mine. Once I've given it a full look over, I'll do a proper write up.


    Agree about the buffers being too heavily sprung, and I just glued the tender tank filler lid shut! 
     

  7. 7812 arrived today. Only time for a quick test on DC but very smooth running straight out of the box.

    The chimney on mine was also displaced slightly, easy to rectify, however doesn’t look like it was well fitted in the first place.

     

    Subsequently found the safety valve bonnet was also very loose and needed re-gluing!

     

    A quick picture outside the George Hotel at Penmaenpool

     

    IMG_3313.jpeg

    • Like 17
×
×
  • Create New...