Jump to content
 

hmrspaul

Members
  • Posts

    6,023
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hmrspaul

  1. On 12/01/2024 at 23:44, kevinlms said:

    I must show Julie that there is worse than ours!

     

    On 12/01/2024 at 23:41, monkeysarefun said:

     

     

    The RSPCA are down on you doing that, as well as pouring Dettol on them. Toads have feelings too!

    I was surprised that the original article didn't give any advice on how to dispose of them. I do agree fridge then freezer does sound reasonable, but then I'm not a Cane Toad. 

     

    I love your Ibis 

     

    SOL04593AustralianIbisBrisbaneSouthBank2023-11-21PaulBartlett.JPG.2258f1ac83e07fbfe7944929cb6fe62d.JPG

     

    Paul

    • Like 8
  2. 2 hours ago, Sjcm said:

     

    The itraveller 0-4-0 diesel set is half-way there to a point as it has the new phone technology (albeit DC), but there's nothing to the lay-out. if they can knock that out for 80 pounds, then a layout with a better model with some actual interest with the track and buildings for 160 pounds should be possible

    I haven't kept up with current offer. But, in the recent past Hornby did various starter packs that were restricted to sale by individual large catalogue companies such as Argos. 

     

    Paul

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  3. 1 hour ago, billbedford said:

     

    I've looked through my copy of 'A Pictorial Record OF LNER Constituent Signalling' and found a photo of a NER signal with a red face and a black band. I feel that signal colours were changed or standardised before the grouping. 

    The HMRS book also mentions that the only way to distinguish distant signals was the V cut in the end of the arm. Also having the black band on the back came in later, with comments that this hadn't happened for some of the signals illustrated. 

     

    Paul

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  4. The GWR (Which the WR remained faithful to) was notorious for mis-ordering. Consider the hundreds of 0-6-0 tanks they had delivered in the first years of BR, many built (partially) by private works, many put straight to store. 

     

    On the other hand, the lack of class 20s or similar in South Wales does seem to have led to O8s being used for trips which might have been better worked by a Class 14. I remember steel trains being worked into Newport Docks https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/br0809/e38e6c62e https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/br0809/e28e846e7 and  Llanwern steel works or the Ford trains in Dan-y-Graig. https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/br0809/e2e8c7978 But, these workings probably didn't inconvenience local mainline working too much. 

     

    Paul

    • Like 2
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, Ian Rathbone said:

    I remember, at spotting session at Crewe in the late fifties, seeing a calf in a sack being loaded into the brake van of a passenger train. 
     

    Ian R

    That is the correct way to carry a calf. I saw similar, one on a platform truck at Derby c1966. 

     

    This discussion appears to overlook that unfitted cattle wagons were common until the 1950s. 

     

    There is a full BR booklet on livestock. They must have been very happy to lose this traffic, very complex to operate. 

     

    Paul

    • Agree 2
  6. 16 hours ago, SRman said:

     

    Not all that unusual. All of the RTs built up to a certain time had top box bodies, as did the non-standard versions from Cravens and Saunders Roe. Top box bodies tended to be disposed of first in the 1960s, including sometimes putting them on Leyland RTL chassis at overhaul, because the RTLs were destined to be sold off before the majority of the AECs. I could give chapter and verse on this, but it would take a lot longer ... such details fill up entire books on the RTs and on London Buses in general.

    I always ask the (rhetorical) question, what other bus company would consider 120 buses as non-standard? 😁 There were 120 Cravens bodied RTs.

     

    Thanks,. I don't have my bus spotter book anymore but IIRC RTs ran into several thousand. Annoyingly RMs appeared on the 117 route very early but we never got the RM on the 90 (1960-68). 

     

    Paul 

    • Like 1
  7. 19 hours ago, arran said:

    HI All

     

    As far i can see its 1967 as Per Paul Bartletts site https://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brfreightlinercontainer this is what we took this livery from with help from Paul. 

     

    I've seen this Freightliner versus Freightliners Ltd discussion before and if you look the Ltd containers are all ISO so can go deep sea , i was told it was always freightliners ltd . Coco Cola don't have Ltd on the front of their cans .  One other thing is Freightliner in the USA make trucks so i wonder if it was to make things clearer .

     

    A definitive answer to this would be good but as of yet its still not nailed down.

     

    Regards arran

    My (rather old) friend Roger Silsbury is the expert on the early Freightliners history. OK, I put my hands up a typo or misreading of the date of lot 3693. All my details on the scans need checking, I did 20 or 30K of them when coming home from work (and for 100 days a year I was either away or home after 21.00). It is quite possible the 1967 was working from an order date.

     

    I am grateful for the information on when "Freightliner Limited" became the title. I couldn't find it in Roger's book, nor clearly on Wikipedia but I was concerned it wasn't 1967 - but also had assumed the container could have been repainted. Perhaps someone could enter it on Wikipedia if they have a clear reference.

     

    I now consider my photo  https://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/brfreightlinercontainer is of it in original 1969 condition. So apologies to Arran for the small mistake [no one gave a ..... when posting these scans 20 years ago]  Does suggest that the alternative earlier Freightliner livery could be produced on this model. 

     

    SOL0720024L71FreightlinersLimited4mmmodelC-railPaulBartlett.JPG.4a6aae99f26fd7dbee1deb77f38e78e3.JPG

     

     

    HLCU2152797HapagLloyd4mmmodelC-railPaulBartlett.JPG.acef12910dc509b13a3a4e43b69f42af.JPG

     

     

    SOL07204OCLU01994734mmmodelC-railPaulBartlett.JPG.5bc61fad696f787d009daf430af4fee0.JPG

     

    Now what is needed is the type M curtainsided container  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brfreightliner/e3d898f2f introduced in 1966 and pre-dating the now universal York curtain side trailers. 

     

    Paul

     

    • Like 3
    • Informative/Useful 1
  8. On 28/12/2023 at 21:55, J. S. Bach said:

    Where I worked in south Florida (off-campus location for a while), there was an off-shoot of a large retention lake and these white Ibises would congregate on the shore:

     

    There were many more than those in the photo.

     

    I am not sure what this one is, but it was common to see it perched on the structure:

    100_3163.JPG.921c31992fa8ac2e5208c637476bdf5c.JPG

    Note that there were fish in the pond.

     

     

    🙂

    Anhinga anhinga - notable for usually swimming with only their head out of the water an appearance that gives them the name Snake bird. Common throughout much of the Americas.

     

    Paul

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 4
  9. Sept 86 twin piped https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brhaapost80/e3e15b870  &  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brhaapost80/ec688f53  &  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brhaapost80/e3ee4bd30  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brhaapost80/e38995ee5

     

    May 87 twin https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brhaapost80/e2f12f296

     

    It looks like they came off by 1988. https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brhaapost80/ef4daea39

     

    I'd understood that BR dispensed with the reservoir pipe because the wagons coming in from Europe didn't have them, only a single pipe. So one of them in a train and the reservoir didn't work. [Mark responded whilst I was watching TV]

     

    Paul

    • Like 2
  10. On 19/12/2023 at 11:58, bluedepot said:

    The number is familiar, the model brake rigging isn't! https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/brmineralweld/e2f25b7b5  I thought N gauge was improving. And no, I cannot remember the last time I had any contact with Peco models. Perhaps the 13t hopper 7mm kit that was promised but never appeared. 

     

    Paul

  11. On 21/12/2023 at 11:04, Mol_PMB said:

    A Mk1 coach, a Freightliner(ish)* container flat, and a rake of 16t minerals, all in the same train:

    O'0308 Fearn NB Goods nd

    from Ernie on Flickr. 
     

    *Is this actually a former Speedfreight container in blue stripe livery?

    Mol

    CA 27ft container https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/speedfreight/e68e4cf20  https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/speedfreight/e67e0ad67

     

    Paul

    • Like 2
    • Informative/Useful 3
  12. On 19/12/2023 at 16:20, gardenwall said:

    Those built up until 1966 were vacuum braked, eventually the survivors were converted to air brake but  the Shell-BP livery had ceased by then. The mid grey Shell would have been air braked from new, let us hope later runs will add air brake detail, the earlier liveries are fine (as long as you only look at one side). 

    Although rather tired the two logo Shell BP livery could survive a long time. Such as on this TTB in 1988 https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/p125474082/e7c1d3b85 Despite the TOPS code I doubt it still has a vacuum pipe. Or this in 1989 https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/p125474082/e74f2eb6f

     

    Paul

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...