HGR

That's interesting ... I did wonder if the first batch of BAA were also candidates for the 'flimsy' / removable transverse cradles as were the other batches, before they were all transferred to various other diagrams. Some were already given BKA with the 'kinky beams' for lengthways loading of four large coils. There was a later conversion with much more substantial (and presumably permanently fixed) transverse cradles - think it was four per wagon ? The existence of ISSUE 3 of the BA 001A diagram at least means there was an intent, though not necessarily that any wagons were actually fitted with the cradles in the end. Presumably there was a pool of cradles that could be swapped freely around the different wagons. That the code BA 001A was then cancelled means that all of the wagons in this batch had wandered off elsewhere as a result of conversion, destruction, or transfer to other type codes.

 

Of the other diagrams in my list, you will probably find many of them are pre-nationalisation or very early British Railways types. The B.R. (B) diagram books that I have do appear to have had the early cancellations removed, but then the later ones left in.

 

Many Thanks, SED Freightman. Much appreciated.

 

Having set away to make a spreadsheet of the Design Codes and what books the various revisions of them lurk in between the books I have, those on Barrowmore and the gaps that your scanning has usefully filled, I hadn't contemplated just how long it would take ! Anyway, I now have a list that makes some sense of the B.R. (B) and Book 320 parts. What I'll do is add some titles to the code groups to make it a bit more 'readable' and then post it on here.

 

Could I trouble you please for a further trawl through your books and loose diagram pages to see if any of the following come to light ? They are mainly from parts 1 / 2 / 3, before the ones you have been scanning that were in the most my missing part 4.

 

These first two might be too 'new' for your book if it wasn't updated after the first revision, but :

 

BA 001 A      looking for ISSUE  3 of this to see if it was given the removable coil cradles as for the other variants of BAA, or if they all got transferred to the engineers fleet without having this.

 

BB 001 F      anything prior to ISSUE 4 please ?

 

Now for some older stuff ...

 

BC 003 B

BC 008 A

 

BD 005 A

 

BE 002 ?

BE 003 ?

 

BF 001 ?

BF 002 A, B      ISSUE 1

BF 003 A, B

 

BH 001 B

 

BK 001 A, B

 

BM 002 B      Bogie Bolster 'B'

 

BP 001 D, E

 

BR 001 A, B

BR 005 A

 

BS 001 A

BS 002 A

 

BT 001 A, B

BT 002 A, B

 

CA 001 B

CA 005 G, K, L

 

CA 018 A, B      were these ever allocated to G.W.R. / B.R.(W)  TOADs - before being re-used for S.R. Queen Mary bogie brake vans ?

 

CA 019 A      likely another G.W. TOAD

 

CB 001 B      1st. / ISSUE 1

 

CC 001 J, K, L      1st. / ISSUE 1

 

CD 001 A      1st. / ISSUE 1

CD 001 B      1st. / ISSUE 1 or 2

 

CG 001 ?

 

CH 001 P

 

CM 011 A

 

CP 001 G

 

CT 009 A

 

CU 001 A, B      re-coded bogie tanks - these might not have been redrawn ?

 

CX 001 A, C

 

CZ 003 ?

CZ 004 A

 

FA 003 D

FA 004 A, B

 

FB 003 A      ISSUE 1

 

FF 002 A

FF 004 A

 

FG 002 A

 

FG 004 S, T

 

FI 001 A, B, C

 

FJ 001 A

 

FP 002 A

 

FT 001 A, B

 

FV 002 A

FV 003 A, K, M, W

 

FV 013 ?      did someone superstitious skip this one !

 

FW 001 A      CONFLAT ISO TANK (ex RECTANK)

 

FZ 015 A

 

HA 002 G, J

 

HC 001 C

 

HI 002 A

 

HT 005 B

 

HT 021 A

 

JX 001 A

 

KA 001 A, B

 

KG 001 A      think this was altered slightly as well as being re-coded from KI

 

KJ 001 A, B

 

KN 001 A

 

KR 001 A

 

KT 001 ?

KT 002 ?

KT 003 A

 

KY 002 A

 

MS 002 K, L, M, P

 

MX 001 B, D

 

OV 001 B

 

SP 011 A, B      you may have looked for these already / I missed them first time round ?

ST 009 J, L, N

 

VA 001 B      the first version 45 tonne from lot 3686

VB 001 C      first version, 45 tonne from lot 3764 with centre doors (COV CD before re-coding)

 

VB 003 C, E, F

 

VD 002 A

 

VE 001 A

 

Many Thanks, SED Freightman. Much appreciated.

 

 

 

 

 

SED Freightman :

 

As well as VW 002A that you had spotted I had missed off my list, I've also missed off VP 004A - can you have a look if you have that one as well please ?

 

 

Was the mass exodus of 12 T VANFITs in the early '70s around about the same time parcels traffic was disappearing off the railways ? A cull at this stage would have fortuitously saved someone a sizeable job entering all of them onto TOPS.

 

I remember the rail blue SPVs that had been repurposed from FISH vans also going around this same period - including the body of E 87009 randomly appearing in the middle of a field at Sadberge near Darlington. The 1N21 / 1D21 Doncaster Works Test Train that used to run round at Tyne Yard or Darlington, etc. depending on its progress managed to gain a string of these SPVs as a load for some years - later being replaced by a rake of plain blue LMS full brakes, then more latterly by blue/grey Mk.1s.

 

 

  

29 minutes ago, hmrspaul said:

Fascinating, not a diagram book I have seen before. 

 

But, I suspect very misleading. The vans in particular are a good resume of pre-nationalisation designs - even a Mink G - but I very much doubt they made it to exist as REVENUE wagons by the time TOPS was up and running. 

 

Is MC001B depicting the very common replating of the sides of the standard 108 mineral?

 

Paul

Are you meaning MC 011B in the earlier scanned images ? If so, it's the stiffening bars that some of the pre-nationalisation types had. Ones of L.M.S. origin in this instance.

 

Although not amongst the above scans, the various diagram MC 001 variants are the B.R. 1/108 MINs. Design codes / diagrams MC 001A to D are the re-bodied ones (diag. B.R. 1/99) with various types of brakegear. MC 001E to J cover the non-rebodied B.R. 1/108 again with various forms of brakegear - unfitted, vac, with and without empty/loaded changeover. Partial replating was simply counted as repair, so would not be evident in the diagrams.

 

Bear in mind that the first allocation of TOPS codes for wagons was made in 1970 / 1971, but the actual 'go-live' was not started until 1973 and took a couple of years to spread throughout the system, by which time some of the more obscure stuff had gone by the wayside so didn't last long enough for those vehicles to actually have received the allocated codes. So some of these diagrams might have never seen any vehicles in service. There were certainly plenty of diagrams missing from and struck through in the index of the first issue B.R. (B) TOPS diagram book. In general, within any group of design codes, at initial allocation of the codes the air-braked designs come first, then the rest of the B.R. designed diagrams, then the pre-nationalisation types. After that, new additions are appended to the list as and when they crop up.

 

4 hours ago, SED Freightman said:

The last of the vans - Part 1.  I do not have copies of diagrams VV 035A or VV 036A, although there are a few diagrams in Book 320 (Part 4) that have not been requested (eg. VW 002A) which presumably you already have ?

 

Thanks ever so much for all the scanning you've been doing.

 

In theory the diagrams that I hadn't requested are the ones that survived to revision 4 so I have copies of in my post-'83 books albeit possibly at later issue than the originals you have in your copy, or they are air braked and tucked away in the last part of the weirdly re-organised early book 320 that I have, but you've got me on VW 002A ... it should have been on my list but I missed it, if you have it please ?

 

Revision Letter 1 is what got you from the B.R. (B) series books into the first issue of Book 320. Please can you have a look at the Revision Letter 1 for Part 4, to see if it lists any diagrams that were amended or added ? (part 1 had some diagram amendments, but parts 2 & 3 were just the covers changed from the look of it).

 

Can you have a look to see if any of your book 320 parts have a copy of Revision Letter 2 and 3 ?

 

If your pile of loose diagram pages does throw up missing ones that you don't have in Book 320, but are on my list, then you could well be sitting on the goldmine that is the stuff culled during or prior to the B.R. (B) books. Particularly also if you find diagrams that are not in book 320 and neither are on my list. For example if you come across HM [001A] that would have been allocated to the bogie iron ore hoppers used on the Tyne Dock - Consett ore trains. These survived up till 1974, but I never saw any with TOPS codes on them. Mind you, didn't see any with '64 style 'boxed' lettering either for that matter ! Just 56 T above the wagon number.

 

 

 

 

37 minutes ago, SED Freightman said:

Yet more vans this evening.

 

Yep, till the mid-'80s the TOPS code VVV just about covered all sorts of anything with doors and a roof that reflected many different by then past traffics which had by then coalesced into what could be described as no better than sundries. Then all of a sudden there was a vast clearout and all the interesting stuff evaporated ... mostly into farmers' fields, other than what picked up departmental prefixes, or internal user numbers.

 

Fruit and Ale to finish, that's two of your five-a-day ... what a result !

 

One thing about cattle vans : The dia. 354 ones were drawn the other way round to all the others so the internal partition was at the left end instead of to the right. I've not been able to find enough detailed underframe photo's to see if the brake gear was the opposite way to the body on these compared to other cattle diagrams ?

 

Thanks.

 

13 hours ago, jonhall said:

 

That would be a very useful resource, perhaps you could post it here for others to reference.

 

Thanks,

 

Jon

It's a MS Excel file, but noticed that the file attach on these posts includes them, so should be OK. Might do a 'print' of it as well as PDF in case there are people who don't have (or dislike) MS Excel.

 

What it does do is highlight some of the anomalies in the diagrams - see for example VV 009C ... AARKND is VVVV (not VVVC as you might expect given the type of vac brake fitted). This may well be a typo, as there was no VVV-V on the RSL vehicle type lists as far as I'm aware ?

 

I'm trying to get it up to the codes around in the '90s, which is about where my involvement in these sorts of things got to. Once it's pretty much done I'll post it.

 

20 hours ago, SED Freightman said:

My copies of Book 320 indicate that they incorporate the Revision 1 amendments of February 1982, I initialed the amendment sheet but after 38 years I cannot recall the extent of the amendments although no doubt they contained diagrams to be added and other to be removed.  I do have a pile of diagram sheets, which presumably should have been destroyed and which may perhaps contain some of the missing diagrams, I will delve into these once thee inital scanning is complete.

Thank you once more for your continued work with these. It's much appreciated and filling in a fair chunk of missing knowledge in my technical 'library'.

 

For whatever reason, the British Railways (B) books, and copies of various early revisions of Book320 that I have are devoid of the part(s) where the vans lurk. The copies posted by various people on Barrowmore MRG seem to have a similar trait - almost like the old vans were very secretive !

 

Think I mentioned before, my two parts of B.R. Diagram Book (B) only gets you as far as the end of the 'O' OPENs group. Anything after that I'm missing. Back in those days, there weren't revisions as we have now. Instead, the D.O. issued 'Circular Letters' numbered sequentially one upwards as each revision was issued. Each C.L. contained a raft of various amendments to be made by hand to the diagram pages in the books. Mine include Circular Letter No. 3. Dated 14 June 1977. I'm not aware that there were any more C.L.s after that until they went to Book 320. Fortunately whoever updated the (B) books that I have did not remove / destroy the pages for diagrams that were 'cancelled' - they are still in there for historical interest.

 

In 1981 there was a big project started in the D.M.& E.E. which produced the 'REVISED VEHICLE DIAGRAM BOOK NUMBERING SYSTEM' so that the various TOPS diagram books all now lived in one big series. Locos used to be in the MT specification section, as were cranes / tracklayers. Wagons were pulled from the B.R. (B) and P.O. (P) books. Coaches, which hadn't been tackled so far under TOPS, had to be done afresh, notwithstanding that despite NPCCS being the first coaching stock to go onto TOPS, was the last book to make it out of the D.O. ... not appearing until 1986 !

 

Now revisions came out under cover of a 'Revision Letter', again numbered in sequence from 1 upwards in order of appearance. So, to move the freight stock (B) books into Book 320 in the new series, Revision Letter No.1 dated February 1982 provided the new covers and a selection of updated and new diagrams to incorporate.

 

Seem to remember Revision 4 was the outcome of the big 1983 - 85 re-coding (and vehicle renumbering) exercise in order to allow all of the coaching stock to be accommodated by TOPS without the poor computer getting confused by owner / prefix or number 'vehicle origin' suffix letters. In the case of wagons, it cleared out the 'J', 'K', 'X' groups etc. for re-use elsewhere.  

 

Revision 9, out in 1990 was the last Revision I received, which lasted till the 'end-of-days' (or privatisation as the Government called it). After that, Railfreight Distribution (RfD) continued the tradition. 

 

One of the sets of Book 320 parts that I managed to acquire had weirdly been rearranged to have Vac Brake and Unfitted (in Part 1 and Part 2 covers), getting as far as 'OU' codes, and Air Brake and Air Pipe No 2 (in Part 4 cover), starting with 'OA'. Probably better suited the way they worked for preparing consists. So I'm guessing the missing Part 3 cover would have been Air Brake and Air Pipe No 1, and held the rest of the vac / unfitted - including the runner wagons, 2-axle (or more accurately, rigid) steel carriers, uncovered and vans, and then the bogie steel AB, Freightliners, MGR / domestic coal hoppers, minerals and so on. So yet again, none of the older vans that I'm interested in !

 

This particular set of Book 320 parts seems to be a revision 1 plus two distinct but very late sets of updates inserted. How bizarre ?

 

To try to make some sense of the various revisions of diagrams, I'm putting together an index so I know which book to look in, or on Barrowmore, or these posted by SED Freightman. On the subject of issue numbers on diagram book pages, beware that these don't directly relate to the TOPS design code that they appear on. Instead they relate to the underlying engineering drawing that forms the diagram book page. So for example the drawing for COIL K which started out as TOPS design code JK 001A was revised to ISSUE 1 with the design code amended to BN 001A when the remaining vehicles in the 'J' group were re-coded into 'B' group etc. So if you're looking for the predecessor of an issue revision, never assume it was the same design code.

 

SED Freightman : I know you're probably not going to want me to say this, but your pile of removed diagram pages may well be worth a scour for the ones that got blitzed during (B) book period / pre or early Book 320. There are lots of diagrams struck out in the first issue of the (B) book index, but I'm not sure if these reflect types that were around in 1970 when the TOPS codes were first allocated, but didn't last long enough (till 1973) to actually make it on to TOPS, or ones cancelled due to becoming extinct after that.

 

Anyway, a big thank you for your perseverance with the scanning.

 

 

Thanks SED Freightman. I'm guessing many of the ones you're missing in the initial issue of Book 320 could well be those that went in the '70s. Where no lot numbers are listed in the index against the diagram it often is for pre-nationalisation types, which could of course be early candidates for withdrawal. For VS 004A/B and VS 005A however these are later B.R. lots than the other SHOCVANs so not sure what would have happened to them ?

 

 

Different numbering series keefer ... the cl.40 locos for use at Crewe were given cl.97/4 numbers 97405 - 97408, and the Peaks dropped into the 97/4 series later. The battery locos were cl. 97/7.

Close but not quite ... different vehicles of the same batch of conversions. (though typo I guess ?, next key along the keyboard, prefix was LDB)

 

Originally short-frame (57') motor coaches DMBSO from disbanded North London Line cl. 501 units. Passenger saloons gutted and filled with battery racks. Windows plated over with ventillation grilles. Flat section to roof for access to OLE. End doors added for use in tunnels. They were coupled back-to-back in pairs. Ten vehicles done over the period 1973 (DB 975178/9 later LDB..., then became 97701/2 for Merseyside), 1975 (LDB 975407-10, later ADB..., then became 97707-10 for GN electrification based at Hornsey). The batch for the Bed-Pan electrification ordered in 1978 as LDB 975673-6 were cancelled first time around, and came out later in 1980 as 97703-6 without carrying the originally allocated LDB975... numbers.  

 

 

 

Thanks again SED Freightman. Going back into the very dim and distant now.

 

I wonder if the banana van diagram being missing meant that they had all been lost into the general van pool or re-used as barrier wagons by then ? Can remember seeing some of the later corrugated end sort coded RBV. Some still had the BANANA lettering. ISTR some carrying code VVV.

 

 

S 61872 was the one-off motor coach on lot 30641 that was put in 4 EPB unit 5302. Does anyone have a photograph of the roof of this unit with enough detail to tell if this vehicle had only one periscope, as it would for a dia. 414 vehicle, or did it have two periscopes ? Alternative may be an interior shot of the guard's van to see if it had the extra periscope in the middle of the van for when the driving cab was leading, as well as the one on the bulkhead used if the coach is at the very rear of the train. Some sources attribute dia. 400 to this motor coach, which implies two periscopes. If a roof shot after the periscope(s) removed, there would be rectangular blanking plates covering the slots in the roof where the periscopes previously were.

 

The significance is that the instruction originally was that the guard should ride in the rear-most van in the train. Southern region four-car units up to '57 stock had a motor coach with a van at each end, adjacent to the driver's cab. Consequently a four-car unit bringing up the rear of any train formation would have the rearmost van such that the guard would only need one periscope to look towards the middle of the unit, and hence forwards in the direction of travel.

 

A two-car unit only has one van, in the motor coach. It could be facing either way round at the rear of a unit formation, so necessitated two periscopes so the guard had a forward-facing view regardless of whether the unit was running motor coach leading or trailing.

 

5302 being a four-car EPB would have only needed a single periscope in the van, so this motor coach could well be to dia. 414. However, it later migrated to other units such as 2 HAP 6151, meaning that either it had two periscopes (or was modified to be so), hence dia. 400, or the use of periscopes had been discontinued by that time.

 

1 hour ago, Steven B said:

Having done some more digging, don't the three inspection saloons built at Swindon to Diagram 1/552, numbers 999506, 999508 and 999509 count as Mk1 designs? All three were built on a standard 57' underframe, and using standard body side components as far as I'm aware.

 

The BR built Dia 1/551 (DB999501 - 5 ) were based on the LMS design, which have a very different profile & underframe to 999506/8/9.

 

Steven B.

Likewise, done a bit of digging also. You've found an interesting one there. It appears DB 999506, and DB 999508 - 9 were originally ordered from Swindon to GWR dia. Q 13 and should have appeared somewhere around the late 1950s, but by the time they were built they became rather Mk.1 style, with only two end windows (the placement of which means they didn't have the standard end framing / crash pillars). The diagram 1/552 lists them all as being built 1963 ?

 

1 hour ago, Steven B said:

Have the Mk1 based inspection saloons been counted? Oddly they don't appear in Parkin's excellent Mk1 Coaches book.

 

Steven B.

Beware that you might have come unstuck with these. B.R. perpetuated a couple of types of these ... one sort based on LMS diagram 2046, the others to GWR diag. Q 13, so neither count as Mk.1.

 

There was ISTR one of the original LMS saloons that had its body transplanted on to a Mk.1 underframe, complete with B4 bogies. Can't remember if it was the General Manager's saloon or the one that used to go around with the royal train pre-1977.

 

The designation of 'Mk' appears to have come about when the second variant of 'integral design' coaches came out as Mk. IIA. Up till then, what was later termed Mk. I were generally referred to as 'Standard' stock. The first 'integral design' coaches then picked up the identifier Mk. II.

 

British Railways set up the Standard Carriages committee (SC). There were likewise committees for Standard Locomotives (SL), and Standard Wagons (SW) though the latter is a far more loose concept to get your head around. The drawing office output of each of these is reflected in the format of the drawing numbers : so for standard coaches, SC, followed by a '/' then two letter code identifying the works / drawing office, another '/' and followed by an index number usually from 1 upwards. And yes, the code for Swindon was, you guessed it, SW, so wagon drawings from there go SW/SW/1 onwards.

 

Within the SC drawings there were two lengths of underframe - commonly referred to as 57' (short frame) and 64' (long frame). The actual lengths over headstocks were 56'11" and 63'5" respectively. These seemingly obscure dimensions, when applied with standard buffing / drawgear components yielded body lengths that were round numbers. The frames could be used with fixed screw couplings, British Standard suspension gangways (even offset for TPOs) or Pullman type. The end of the body was flat if non-gangwayed, or with 6" angled side panels if gangwayed. So, short frame stock came as 57'6" or 58'0", and long frame stock came as 63'6" if flat both ends (non-gangwayed), 64'0" for vehicles such as EMUs with flat inner end and angled driving cab front, and 64'6" for vehicles gangwayed both ends or at least fitted with Pullman rubbing plates.

 

Some builders / works found ways to introduce some small variation in body length - possibly not helped because some quoted length over body framing instead of overall length. Notwithstanding the roof was a standard length, but it would take more than the casual observer to spot the difference between the 'standard' two and a half inch overhang, and ones with only two inch or one and a half inch. On some vehicles the overhang was different at the two ends ! (surprisingly common within EMUs)

 

The 'standard' design of underframe as used on hauled stock and DEMU / EMUs, was a 200 Ton strength. Many DMMUs used the standard underfame (and hence body) lengths, but on a much lighter weight underframe with correspondingly lower strength. Hence you weren't allowed to put 'lightweight' DMUs into goods train consists with a heavy load behind them. They later painted 'LW' on the ends above the buffers to warn shunters of this less-than-obvious feature. 

 

As to body profile, this was a fixed radius curve in standard stock, with the widest part at the height of the middle door hinges. There were flat sided varieties as well, for vans. Also various reduced widths for stock on lines with limited clearances. Many DMMUs did not use the standard coach body construction components, hence the variation in body profiles between particularly the contractor supplied stock. I would agree that these lightweight DMMU don't really count as true Mk.1. There are some DMMU that are Mk.1 construction proper, even if they have B.S. suspension gangways. They tended to come from places such as Swindon, such as Inter Cities Diesel Trains, Cross Country, and Trans-Pennine as they were referred to at the time. 

 

Turning to the passenger rated four-wheeled vans of the era, some such as the FRUIT D were clearly of pre-nationalisation design, as were the SPVs that were inherited freight stock diagrams formerly INSUL-FISH and very much of LNER Faverdale vintage. Wouldn't count these as Mk.1. Nor the ex. LNER bogie CCTs. The B.R. standard CCT and HB were very much Mk.1, when you consider that they used all of the structural members, panels and fittings lifted out of the SC drawings, with a bit of pilfering of SW wagon stuff for the underframes. The GUVs were simply Mk.1 short frame, flat sided vehicles. If you go the other way there are a small number of 'Mk.1' design vehicles in the freight stock - particularly Ferry Motor Car Vans and bogie Scenery Vans that are pretty much CCT and GUVs with wagon numbers.

 

When you look at stock totals, there were of course vehicles built new, but there were many conversions of existing vehicles of varying degrees, particularly when looking at the source vehicles for some of the EMUs.

 

For more technical detail, and diagrams / photographs describing the above, Parkin's book is well worth a thorough read.

 

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, hmrspaul said:

I wonder what diag 13 was mentioned on UC002A and B ? It shows an end door on a relatively (compared to diag 1/051 china clay) high wagon. I don't recognise it at all. Was it simply the wrong wagon to show a diagram for the standard clays equipped with the fixed high bar for ball clay? 

 

Paul

When converted from ordinary CLAYs, the CLAYHOODs were allocated diagram BR 1 / 13. However I've never seen a copy of it. The wagon depicted in UC 002 A / B weirdly seems to have gained an extra plank, as CLAYs were five-plank of well and truly GWR origin. Coincidence the GWR ones were diagram O 13 ?

 

Just to add to this, when these were re-coded into the 'O' group in 1983, UC 002 A / B became OO 002 A / B ... fair enough. However, later OO 002 C and OO 002 D were added to cover the ones that had now been fitted with roller bearings (not a good move on something carrying loose powdered stone !) but these two later diagrams show them without hood / support bar but with AARKND of OOV H which would indicate CLAYHOOD. The inside height of these six-plank oddities is same as the original five plank B.R. 1 / 51 CLAY, so methinks a bit of drawing office licence ???

 

 

Thank you again. Getting into the weird stuff now. We were used to an eclectic mixture of steel carriers in the N.E. area, but clays and pig irons were more of two parts of the country I didn't get to see much of.

 

Cheers for all your hard work. Much appreciated.

 

Thank you again.

 

Missing ones could be an indication of all examples of that diagram being withdrawn or converted to something else, and the diagram becoming extinct before 1974, as the codes were originally allocated early around 1970 / 1971. Presumably any extinct diagrams wouldn't be drawn up.

 

Thanks for those.

 

When you get round to the cattle vans, please can you look out also for the following that appear to have been deleted quite early on :

 

VC 001B

VC 006B

VC 007A, B

 

Cheers.

 

The mirrors originally fitted in Mk.1 coaches had an engraved B R monogram formed with the B reversed and abutting the script 'R'. Sorry, haven't got a photo' to hand but do have such a mirror that survived past all of the later 'arrows of indecision' branded replacements.

 

Apologies it's a long list !

 

Thank you for those.

 

The diagrams that would have been in (B) part 3 were, in addition to the ones you have posted :

 

RR 001A to RR 001N (excluding that there was no 'I' suffix, as per normal practice with these things). These were assorted Runner Wagons converted from Plate Wagons. Some of these codes were later re-used for similar vehicles, but not the same as the original diagrams. I have RR 001C, E, G that came much later but used different source vehicles. Of the original RR 001 series, these were recoded from SP 005A, 013A, 014A, B, 015A, B, C, 016A, 017A, 018A, B, C, D (not in that order though). Some of these SP you have posted already earlier.

 

RT 004A was the rectangular bodied version of Diesel Brake Tender.

 

For the S group, looking for :

 

SO 001F and G

 

SP 003A, B, F

SP 004C, D, J

SP 006B

SP 007A

SP 008A, B, C

SP 009A

SP 010A, B

SP 012A

SP 018A, B, C, D

 

ST 002A, B, C

ST 003B

ST 004A

ST 005A, B

ST 006A, B

ST 007A, B

ST 008A

ST 009A, F, G

ST 010B

ST011A, B

 

SW 002A

 

For the U group, looking for :

 

UC 001A, B      (these recoded OO 001A, B)

UC 002A, B      (these recoded OO 002A, B)

 

UL 001A, B

 

UP 001A, B, C, D

UP 002A

UP 003A

 

US 001A, B

US 002A

 

UT 001A

UT 002A, B, C

 

UY 001A, B

 

UZ 002B

UZ 003A

UZ 004A

 

Now for the vans in the V group, looking for :

 

VC 001A

VC 002A, B

VC 003A

VC 004A

VC 005A

VC 006A

 

VD 002A

 

VF 001A, B

VF 002A, B, C

VF 003A

 

VN 001A

 

VP 002A

VP 003A, B

VP 005A

VP 006A

VP 007A

 

VQ 001B

VQ 003A

VQ 004A

 

VR 001A

VR 002A, B

 

VS 001A

VS 002A

VS 003A

VS 004A, B, C

VS 005A

 

VV 001A

VV 002A

VV 003A

VV 004A, B, C, D, E

VV 005A, B, C

VV 006A, B, C

VV 007A

VV 008A

VV 009A, B, C, D

VV 010A

VV 011A

VV 012A

VV 013A

VV 014A, B

VV 015A, B

VV 016A, B, C, D

VV 017A

VV 018A

VV 019A

VV 020A

VV 023A

VV 024A

VV 025A

VV 026A

VV 027A, B

VV 028A

VV 029A

VV 030A

VV 031A

VV 032A

VV 033A

VV 034A

VV 035A

VV 036A, B, C

VV 037A

VV 038A

 

VW 001A, B, C, D

 

VX 001A, B

 

Could you also have a look for any of these please :

 

MC 002A

MC 003E

MC 004A

MC 007A

MC 008A

MC 010B

MC 011B

MC 012A

 

MD 003B

MD 006A

 

MS 002H

 

OH 003C      (the original one, or as re-coded OW 003C, wooden body HYBAR)

OH 004A      original, or as re-coded OW 004A      (wood body HYBAR)

OH 019E      or as re-coded OW 015D

OH 020A

 

OL 003A

 

OS 005A

OS 007A, B

OS 009A

 

Hope this all makes some sense. Please give me a shout if not.