Jump to content
 

hobbyhorse

Members
  • Posts

    509
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hobbyhorse

  1. Well pleased with my 2, one chocolate/cream and one crimson. Ordered Sunday afternoon and arrived Tuesday morning. Both run extremely well without any running in needed. Noted the missing brown paint on the central doors, not a problem to add with some decal film and a bit of colour matching. 

     

    Simon

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. On 02/02/2024 at 21:03, Tricky said:

    Here’s a question - poss a silly one but as I don’t know the answer for sure: does anyone know what would the S Healing & Sons wagons have conveyed? Coal, sacks and a sheet, barrels? Any ideas…?! 

    I’ve been following your thread and enjoying your journey. A long time ago the club I was a member of built a layout with the Tewksbury shed area modelled reasonable accurately, one of the thing I did was to put together some wagons, and seeing your reference to S Healing & Son it’s one of those i did. The photo shows it and some of the others, a bit of modellers license used but do look convincing.

     

    Simon

     

    29AD3FCA-6A38-46B9-9F21-75EEAD6CD645.jpeg

    • Like 12
  3. 14 minutes ago, LDM34046 said:


    Yes! I used to visit Bredgar a lot as a kid but haven’t visited in recent years.

     

    Do you work there? I’m a commercial photographer by trade so waiting for a good event to come along to and shoot. It’s a stunning railway in a great location.

    Yes I volunteer at the railway, keep an eye on the WEB site. We have the classic car event tomorrow but with limited rides because of restrictions, but hopeful that our model railway show in August will have less restrictions.

     

    Simon

    • Like 1
  4. 52 minutes ago, LDM34046 said:

    Having lived nearby and visit Medway and Dartford on a near daily basis I’m really excited to see this layout develop.

     

    Have you visited the Sittingbourne & Kemsley Light Railway in Medway? That’s a great little railway with a unique industrial setting!

    Yes have visited the S&KLR it certainly an interesting area. I spend a lot of time at the Bredgar railway just up the road, have you visited us.

    Thanks for the comments its starting to come to life.

     

    Simon

  5. Things are progressing well with the gantry crane, RC gear fitted, primmer applied and the control cabin constructed.

    Also built another two cranes, these being 2 axis versions. With these I built all the beams as nothing available in the sizes I needed.

    With these I'm using a different control system which is wired, one of the group suggested using an Arduino and Joy stick, which has provided excellent control, it is also fitted to it is a servo output which will control a plate to remove alignment issues.

     

    Simon

     

    Youtube Videos 

    Gantry Crane

    2 Axis Crane

     

    Mqq0rI4.jpg

    0tweYHc.jpg

    NvOWNlA.jpg

    ROnl3oy.jpg

    33Y9jOO.jpg

    MQwj40c.jpg

    uEbtZgc.jpg

    cMd0QQl.jpg

    • Like 4
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
    • Round of applause 1
  6. 7 hours ago, Mark L Horstead said:

    "As you can see..."

     

    I wish that I could.

     

    I've printed that photograph, full-sized, and can decipher some abbreviations like H(ither) G(ree)n Dep(arture) - or Dep(ot)?, D(ow)n S(i)d(i)ngs, Stew(art) L(a)n(e), etcetera, but...

     

    I have no idea what the notations in the first column are, much of the second column baffles me, and the third and fourth appear to be times - arrival in the third and departure in the fourth? What is the significance of the // between what I take to be hour and minutes, and why does that only appear in some?

     

    It's probably all obvious to many/most here, but I've waited and waited to see if anybody else asks before I out myself as the dummy and nobody has.

    Mark

    The first column, PB73 is prepare from birth, RW73 is relieve and work, both ED's . FS is freight shunt. RA is relieved at, in this case Lewisham.

    Second column, NX New Cross, Plum Plumstead, BA Bricklayers Arms.

    Last two columns, // shows light loco, and F after shows freight.

    Hope this is enlightening.

     

    Simon

     

    • Like 1
  7. Mark, this is the turn which dates from 1980.

    We used platform 4 to make up the departing train if the platform wasn't used to birth a juicer.

    As the headhunt was on a curve we used whistles to control movements, as you can see we didn't have long to shunt so it was very straightforward.IMG_3858.jpeg.a7ddd22e32fa4e7022be9143239ef073.jpeg

     

    Simon 

    • Like 5
  8. 46 minutes ago, Mark L Horstead said:

    I thank you for joining in.

     

    I've been trying to work out the shunting moves, for whichever way I end up depicting the yard.

     

    I see the train arriving and being dropped by the locomotive, which would then cross over just east of the High Street/Southend Road bridge (the crossover no longer exists), run back and take the line to New Beckenham, cross back over just northwest of the signal box (whose windows did not see quite enough use, it would seem), then collect the hoppers, then pull them back towards New Beckenham on the down line.

     

    Am I close?

     

    Where would the hoppers be dropped?

     

    How are they pushed into the yard? I can see no easy route. Eastward towards the northern-most passenger track (Platform 4?), then westward along the lengthy siding (head shunt?) parallel to the New Beckenham route, then back into the yard? It's not easy working through this on a too-small screen...

     

    That seems to explain why the train departed back to Bricklayers Arms via New Beckenham.

     

    How long did this take? Would regular trains be held back to permit this, or could the moves be squeezed into the normal schedule?

     

    And when was the signal box closed and demolished?

    I'll dig out my old books that contain our turns, hopefully it's got the Beck Jun job.

     

    Simon

    • Like 1
  9. 4 hours ago, SED Freightman said:

    Do you have a date for that little mishap, looks as though the loco has split the points.

    The date would have been the early 80's, it was the signalman's error as he had thrown the point when we was halfway over it, it wasn't tracked so he didn't know we was on it, although he could of just look out of the box.

     

    Simon

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. 4 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    Class designation was a thing gained after the event. The true signifier is the order number for Derby-built machines or the letter designation for trade-built machines, when anyone remembered. In this case there's only the Neilson-built ones to consider, which did slip through the letter net, being described as "like O.232". (The Dubs-built members of the 1282 Class were letter E.)

     

    Beware GAs. What date is @ACFIELD interested in? These engines went through several rebuildings: 18" diameter cylinders in the 1890s, their original P boilers replaced by B boilers in the twenty years to grouping, then Belpaire G6 boilers for most in early LMS days. As built, most had splashers with a flat-topped section in the middle, the full sweeping reverse curve coming possibly at re-cylindering for most, though I gather from @Crimson Rambler that this may have come in with the Neilson batch, being due to their chief draughtsman Edward Snowball. 

     

    To establish the configuration of a particular engine at a given date, you'll need to consult S. Summerson, Midland Railway Locomotives Vol. 3 (Irwell Press, 2002). Then you'll need drawings...

     

    This apparently homogeneous group of locomotives turns out to be a minefield.

    Your obviously more knowledgeable in these matters, and better placed to advise Acfield with these locos.

    So I'll withdraw the offer of the Derby drawings.

     

    Simon

     

×
×
  • Create New...