Jump to content
 

Nick Gough

Members
  • Posts

    2,146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nick Gough

  1. W1W to W6W (to Lot 1650, built 1941) were a series of 4-Wheel, Covered Carriage Trucks.

    Diagram P22 - 30' 6" x 8 ' 6" , 11 ton 11cwt. The next numbered CCT was W8W of diagram P8.

     

    There was also a separate number series for Auto Coaches running from W1W to W256W.

    W1W was a 59' 6" long, matchboard sided trailer to diagram A, whilst W7W was a 59' 6", panelled trailer to diagram C.

     

    Also there was a horsebox, W7W, of diagram N12.

    • Like 1
  2. Another little quandary - how did the Cholsey goods/loading platform accommodate the change in height from side loading to end loading?

     

    GWR goods platforms were supposed to be set at 3'6" above rail level - according to the official structure gauge. However, this height is lower than the top of the buffer beam, on the stop block, which must be around 6" higher.

     

    Of course, it is difficult to find any prototype photos of this issue.

     

    I have a GWR drawing of an arrangement where the height of the platform drops suddenly next to the stop block: 

    LoadingdockGWR.jpg.741deda87969fda077aca47e701a2894.jpgI suspect this could be done  fairly easily with a brick platform face, but I can't see this being achieved easily with the sleeper walls and gravel/grit surface at Cholsey.

     

    NEVER model a model they say!

     

    When I saw the model of Hungerford, at the recent Abingdon show, I was interested to see that this has a separate ramp, leading up to the end loading point, set into the platform surface:

    P1400870a.jpg.934cca1aebb7d5eb1d20816143c6a77e.jpg

     

    P1400776a.jpg.2e2614e37fac219492564e2a14306fdf.jpg

    I believe this layout has been well researched so I presume this is how the real Hungerford looked.

    It seems a reasonable solution for Cholsey though I don't know what material this ramp would actually have been constructed from.

     

    So, cutting a rectangular piece of 60 thou plastikard:

    P1410008.JPG.c8f2535e569510228498e4ea556ddba7.JPG

     

    Painted grey and glued in place:

    P1410011.JPG.5f30b2db4b8beab9715884ad26e02856.JPG

     

    I think this works reasonably well:

    P1410009.JPG.bdd1335d939e2cf35a6bf1f2ef1200b3.JPG

    (At least until someone can tell me how it should have been done!)

     

    • Like 7
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  3. 4 hours ago, Neal Ball said:

    A very momentous day today!

     

    My County tank 4-4-2T brought its first train into Henley-on-Thames today. Given at one point, it struggled to pull its own weight, I am very pleased to get this far!

     

    Work this morning included adjusting the rear of the loco which had settled at 2mm too low, then adding a Kadee coupling box onto the rear post truck. Whereupon it could bring three carriages into platform 2.

     

    Needless to say, I am very pleased with the progress.

     

    Countytank223725-4-24r.jpg.73b31ce9bca4d2f89bed16a9eda6df8e.jpg

     

    I now need to reinstall the stay-alive, which I removed a while ago as it was so bulky when I was taking the loco body off etc. Then fit some crew and coal.

     

    Probably the last job will be some springing on that rear Pony truck.

    Looks good and perfectly at home at Henley.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. On 23/04/2024 at 22:43, Hal Nail said:

    Was the GWR set in use? They had some problems because they aren't slam door - you have to actually turn the handle. People arent used to it so doors got left open and last year they were withdrawn but I don't know if that's been resolved.

    The SVR has a design to modify the existing locks.

    Several coaches have been fitted with the modified locks in recent months. Further ones will be done in due course.

     

    There are a number of GWR coaches on the Valley that already have slam locks because the GWR bought some from an outside maker in the late '20s/early '30s, but then reverted to the old type until BR days.

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Informative/Useful 7
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  5. 17 hours ago, checkrail said:

    Nice weekend in Bridgnorth and day out with son and grandsons at the SVR spring steam gala on Sunday.  Shame 'Betton Grange' couldn't make it but 'Hagley Hall' and 'Erlestoke Manor' were looking great, as was the Stanier mogul and the delightful 'Fenchurch'.

     

    Here are son and grandson getting in the way as 4930 runs into Bewdley.

    IMG_3512.jpeg.658478f9dba5423063ee0be0ed7ff764.jpeg

     

    IMG_3502.jpeg.66288d9c42d00a4d23be6a40e7e0061b.jpeg

     

    But for me the best bit was the wonderful train of GWR carriages of various types.  Lovely to see the real things after a few years of occasional kit building and peering at old photographs.

    IMG_3504.jpeg.9f9ee256cea53a156072a3a53316ef76.jpeg

     

    We actually rode in the set of Stanier LMS coaches on Sunday, but that was no loss.  As Steve Forbert sang, "Driving a Jaguar's impressive, but you cain't see it go by ..."

     

    Now back to those new PO wagons. 

     

    John C.

    Thought I was looking at photos of Stoke Courtenay for a moment!

    • Agree 1
    • Funny 2
  6. On 22/04/2024 at 22:56, PeterLoader said:

    Well for something a bit different, here is a tour of my model railway room - should be good for anyone suffering from insomnia if nothing else! Click the link below to view. 

     

    A tour of my model railway room

     

     

     

     

     

     
     

    I could happily spend a while here, on the sea wall, watching the trains go by.

  7. Buffer Stop

     

    I am trying to decide on what design of buffer stop I should use for the loading platform.

     

    Should it just be a plain beam, attached to the end wall? Like on the Hungerford model:

    P1400760a.jpg.7f0301eadc63dc637c1807e86be2333d.jpg

     

    Or should it be a rail built version?:

    100_9918a.jpg.154aafb3c136f72b931cb8c3a9e635e6.jpg

    DSC02260.JPG.47f443db7c51781c25dd5d9b5040f445.JPG

     

    I have scanned part of a much larger, long distance photo and highlighted the area where I think the buffer stop is. 

    I would be grateful for any views, and thoughts of what type it would be.Bufferstop11b.jpg.e686b084eb5d420740affb5eeaccc99d.jpg

    • Like 7
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  8. The two main sections of the goods/loading platform joined together:

    P1400996.JPG.85590594bc7c22e8cb4a9aab463970cc.JPG

     

    P1400997.JPG.47ff6e78b6b8ef6168bda126cf082c24.JPG

     

    I have cut long, thin strips of balsa to represent the sleepers forming the platform edge:

    P1410002.JPG.81c26711cbf5807d9e94f29b134c12d6.JPG

     

    I think it's just possible, in the next photo, to see the transverse grooves cut in the lower strip for the individual sleeper ends:

    P1410001.JPG.92381b57d8c9fb3f2d399c997db4d1a2.JPG

     

    • Like 10
    • Craftsmanship/clever 3
  9. 8 hours ago, Nick Gough said:

    This photo is to be found in the book,

    "Thro' The Lens - A Pictorial Tribute to the Official Work of the GWR Photographers"

     

    Though this one isn't dated, all the photos are pre 1948.

    The next plate, in the book, may have been taken on the same date:

    Indicatorshelter_0006.jpg.46b21d4f71113791a3bad88262df538a.jpgThe loco in both photos appears to be a Hall.

     

    I am fairly confident that Plate 199 is post-war. The Dynamometer car is carrying it's later number - I believe it was changed from 790 around 1946 to accommodate a new build batch of Hawksworth C82 Thirds. It's not clear in the scan but, in the original, the tender appears to carry the G crest W insignia.

     

    The mention of "'Castle' class trials", in the caption, relates to plate 197 which is another view of 4074 Caldicot Castle (to @Harlequin's post above) from a test in 1924.

     

    • Like 4
    • Informative/Useful 2
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  10. 8 hours ago, The Fatadder said:

    Assume by the mention of an official GWR photographer this is pre nationalisation.  
     

    This photo is to be found in the book,

    "Thro' The Lens - A Pictorial Tribute to the Official Work of the GWR Photographers"

     

    Though this one isn't dated, all the photos are pre 1948.

    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  11. A look inside an indicator shelter, as recorded by an official GWR photographer.

    Note that there appears to be a sheet of something behind the nearest man, presumably to protect him from the heat of the smokebox:

     

    Indicatorshelter_0002.jpg.d80bfcba732d9e6435518bcaabb8d0cb.jpg

    • Like 4
    • Informative/Useful 7
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  12. Didcot Halt has an inclined ramp at the rear for access to the platform:

    P1350125a.jpg.1141051f67d145da37c204dc6f68c70a.jpg

     

    Again I have used this as a guide for my goods loading platform. The rear wall is also formed from horizontal sleepers, but set at an angle with the ramp:

    P1350119a.jpg.d1caec0b85a2ef7b5b8ce25ed7421018.jpg

     

    So I have cut my balsa walls accordingly:

    P1400994.JPG.8b7191fe56fffa6b80c42a0dad87e9da.JPG

     

    • Like 9
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  13. 6 minutes ago, Tallpaul69 said:

    Glad you enjoyed your visit to Leighton Buzzard.

    Yes we did.

     

    It helped that we had a nice, sunny, warm day, rather than the return to winter of the last few days!

     

    Plus I always welcome the opportunity to browse the LBR's second-hand book selection. I came away with three volumes this time.

    • Like 5
  14. In answer to the query posed in the first post I have found this photo, taken by the official GWR photographer:

    Indicatorshelter_0002.jpg.d80bfcba732d9e6435518bcaabb8d0cb.jpg

     

    Looks like the nearest man has something behind him to protect his back from the heat from the smokebox.

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 3
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  15. 1 hour ago, melmerby said:

    Hi all

    As the title says

    You Tube has started filling the space under every video image with loads of suggestions in thumbnail form.

    Mostly are not relevant.

    It means that any info under the video from the poster is lost.

    I used to get information about the stream/video and/or it's location but these are now gone

     

    How do I get rid of them?

    Sounds like how my Kindle changed last week.

    Also no longer have my watch list displayed and, whereas previously, the display would stay on full screen for a whole series of videos, it now automatically changes back to small screen after each one. 

     

    AnnoyIng and unnecessary changes that I haven't found a way to amend.

     

  16. My next effort is to reproduce the loading dock, as seen in this plan, below the weighbridge:

    GoodsYardplan.jpg.b908d1d8d65d25baab511e7bf541d3cd.jpg

     

     

    According to Railway World, "The goods/end loading platform possessed sleeper walls and a gravel/black grit surface."

     

    I haven't come across any close up photos though it does feature in one of the photos kindly posted by Mike @The Stationmaster a few pages back, to the right of the signal post and alongside the turnout in the Up Relief:

    CholseyGoodsyard-somedetail..jpg.67c7e48e9f24e2169417d46c28b21cdc.jpg.41f6d21a78d0b9a85f732442edd056aa.jpg

     

    Sleeper construction seems to have been unusual for GWR loading docks so I have used the halt platform at Didcot as a guide:

    P1340872.jpg.579338082931e903cf485d63fe86a318.jpg

    Sleepers laid horizontally on their edges, restrained by vertical ones positioned at 8' 6" centres, with the platform edging formed by more horizontal sleepers, laid flat.

     

    I have started by cutting strips of balsa to form the platform walls, then scribed these horizontally:

    P1400978.JPG.7294e522270131ff4b65521e2279ee60.JPG

    I also cut small pieces of 1/16th inch thick balsa for the verticals. This thickness is roughly equivalent to 5" depth of a normal sleeper. 

    • Like 12
  17. Easter weekend we visited our local Heritage line - the Northampton & Lamport:

    P1400898.JPG.2f1d0312dfce77c3d7762ac35fe4fad5.JPG

     

    P1400886.JPG.b4f2bea7822bd4609a5a0b5ce296d8e4.JPG

    This was the former double tracked line between Northampton and Market Harborough. Most of the route was converted into a public footpath and cycleway - the Brampton Valley Way, but this has left enough room for a single line alongside. So you can follow the railway from end to end:

    P1400891.JPG.aa74b6ce50a597f773e4b0126a9f14c6.JPG

     

    This coincided with the opening of their southern extension and new station at Boughton:

    P1400883.JPG.cfb6c7ad9bf426b78d912adc765efca3.JPG

     

    P1400884.JPG.07a413f9287f1de10e11886298874f50.JPGMaking the railway up to 1 1/2  miles in length.

    They have two GWR locos on site, 5967 Bickmarsh Hall and 2884 class 3862, though both are still in the early stages of lengthy restorations.

     

    We had our young grandaughter for a couple of days, in the school holidays, last week. So I decided it was an appropriate time to introduce her to the Leighton Buzzard Railway:

    P1400924.JPG.9ec6bea99dfcd135d9dc556d77adb745.JPG

     

    P1400931.JPG.81b3a5d09a8836324b1efa7b55083adf.JPG

     

    P1400938.JPG.f460d9699746d81505df0ee3e4944ed5.JPG

     

    P1400942.JPG.82785c9b7e3fb68572735eaebe56e7aa.JPG

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...