Jump to content
 

87023Velocity

Members
  • Posts

    2,135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by 87023Velocity

  1. 8 hours ago, MarshLane said:

    Superb as ever. The new ‘90s’ look the business .. wish I’d been there morning could have coped 90004! What do you think to the new BacFar 90s Simon?

     

    Merry Christmas

    Rich

    Thanks Rich, personally I think they are stunning. They are very smooth and quiet. Only grumble like has been mentioned are the unpainted busbars and insulators. Needless to say I will be getting more!

     

    Merry Christmas 

    Cheers 

     

    Simon

    • Like 1
  2. With regards to the roof equipment moulding, I had half an hour spare earlier so had a go at painting the insulators and busbars. I painted a thin coat of Klear on first and then added the paint. Will give a second coat tomorrow. 

    IMG_20221221_202124421.jpg.1a1d623e59ba35a97ee85e2868a897e7.jpg

    • Like 7
  3. 52 minutes ago, Steven B said:

     

    So wrong for both modes! Not the compromise I'd have taken... Ho hum. At least they've removed the buffing plate on the later orange Freightliner version.

     

    The OO Gauge model appears to share the same problem.

     

     

    Steven B.

    Hi Stephen,

     

    The Dapol Mk3s are done the same (not checked my Farish MK1/2s), sort of half way, they are in line with the gangway when for coupled, the buffers should have the saddles removed and pushed back, coupled to a loco (not using buckeye) the buffers should extend past the gangway. I think all model locos 33/1, 73/coaches which feature this coupling arrangement (even in 4mm) have had a compromise in this area. 

     

    Cheers

     

    Simon

     

     

    • Like 1
  4. 90019 Penny Black on hire to Virgin trains. Mine has just arrived and it is a stunning model (dare I say model of the year??), done several laps of the layout in push mode with a rake of 8 Dapol mk3s and a DVT and through a few different crossovers in the fiddleyard again in push mode with no derailments etc.

    IMG_20221221_125205052.jpg

    IMG_20221221_125355111.jpg

    IMG_20221221_125259418.jpg

    • Like 12
  5. On 06/12/2022 at 21:21, MarshLane said:

    Hi Simon,

    Superb and very enjoyable as ever!  Hope you've got a warm coat .. you can't stop entertaining us just because its cold!!! :)

    Rich

    Thanks Rich, yes think my big coat might be wise, I do have a portable oil fired radiator but very reluctant to plug it in and switch on!

    Noticed some of the locos I have tried have been slow to get going and need a few circuits to warm them up. Not really had an issue with this before but then the radiator was probably used more to keep the chill off.

     

    Cheers

     

    Simon

    • Like 2
  6. 18 minutes ago, ianb3174 said:

    I have a question, apologies if it's been asked before. On the WCML bits I'm familiar with the fast lines are a pair, as are the slow lines. On this layout the two centre lines are the fast lines. Does the protocol change north of Crewe? 

    It is a bit of a mix really. Between Crewe and Winsford, Warrington to Winwick Junction the centre lines are fast lines. Between Golbourne Junction and Springs Branch it changes to a pair of fast and pair of slow lines. Between Euxton and Preston it is paired again. 

     

     

    Cheers

     

    Simon

    • Like 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  7. Looks great David. 😎 Regards the uncoupling, I was struggling, the older Farish coupling design works fine but some of the NEM couplers causing repeat issues. With all the fixed rakes on Dallam, I have put several drops of Johnson's Klear into the coupling pocket and that seems to have done the trick, stops the couplings bouncing up. With Klear it still allows easy removal of the coupler if you wish to change types at a later date. 

    • Thanks 2
    • Informative/Useful 2
×
×
  • Create New...