Jump to content
 

Invicta

Members
  • Posts

    614
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Invicta

  1. On 05/02/2021 at 17:26, Wheatley said:

    I was at junior school  from the mid 70s, the teachers cars were parked at one end of the playground and were, from memory, mostly Minis, Morris 1000s, Triumph Dolomites, Allegros etc. The floaty bohemian one had a VW Beetle which was about as exotic as they got. The headmaster had a Cortina Mk3 which was always immaculate. My dad was a headmaster, we ran Ford Escorts, always second hand, all through the 1970s. These were professionals on reasonable money and there was nothing flashy. 

     

    Most railway staff (and artisans generally) would have had second hand cars if they had one at all, the size usually being dictated by the number of children required to be transported in them at weekends (no seatbelts, you can get 4 small ones abreast in the back of an Escort). Even then most would walk or go on the bus if it was convenient, especially during/after the oil crisis. Almost no-one had second cars, they were too expensive as occasional runabouts. The only railway staff I ever knew with with posh cars were relief sgnalmen, think second-hand Rover, Austin Cambridge etc. Parked next to the box so they could washing it while they were working your Sunday. 

     

    Thinking back to growing up on a 1960's estate, that sounds like a pretty representative cross-section- From memory, the car history of my Dad (miner) in the 70's ran through Ford Anglia,  Vauxhall HB Viva, HC Viva saloon, HC Viva Estate, FE Victor, BL Princess- apart from the Anglia they were usually bought between 18 months- 3 years old and kept for 2-3 years max. Immediate neighbours (miners, NCB office staff, office/management at a local factory etc.)  had mainly a succession of Vauxhalls (Vivas, Mk1 Cavaliers), BL (1100s, Allegros) or Ford (Mk2/3 Cortina, Mk1/2 Escorts, a couple of Mk1 Granadas) or Rootes (Imps, Avengers, Hunters etc.). What I remember of the school car park wasn't much different. 

     

    Foreign cars seemed fairly rare, until sales of Japanese cars started to grow- I've got a vague memory of a neighbour having a Simca 1100 at one point, and my form tutor when I started secondary school in the late 70's had a  couple of Renault 16s, which seemed pretty left-field at the time.

     

    There was certainly a fair amount of 60's - and even late 50's stuff- still around.- At the beginning of my time at secondary school ('79/80) I can remember a couple of Triumph Heralds/VItesses, and at Junior school while my teacher had an HC VIva, her neighbour in the next class had an early Mk1 Mini, and one of the younger female teachers in the infants department used to turn up in a very ratty old Ford 100E- this would have been 1977/8-ish.

     

    Exotica? Not much, although one of our junior school teachers did have an MG Midget, followed by a Lotus Elan, and the neighbourhood Mk1 Escort contingent included either a 1300 Sport or a Mexico

    • Like 5
  2. Doncaster in Feb, followed by Sileby the following weekend. Apart from the GCR Winter Steam Gala, Doncaster usually marks the start of the 'season' for me in terms of going to shows etc., so I certainly didn't anticipate it all being over for the year in those three weekends, apart from managing a few day's break in Wales and a trip on the Welshpool in September...

     

     

  3. 3 hours ago, wainwright1 said:

    The Midland and SER  had virtually identical single verandaed six wheeled brakes. The SE & CR re-built theirs and built new ones with verandas at both ends. (Slight difference to the end detail on one end on the re-built ones).

    So these could be genuinely be liveried in : MR, SER, SE & CR, LMS, SR and BR liveries, and possibly others ?

    So not a bad start.

    Ray

     

    One of the smaller Midland 4-wheelers to the similar pattern (as per the Slater's kit) ended up on the Isle of Wight as Isle of Wight Central Railway No.5 and survived long enough to wear SR colours at least- both guises are lllustrated in the Essery Midland Wagons books (vol 2 p 91)

    • Like 2
    • Informative/Useful 1
  4. 58 minutes ago, Nile said:

    And beaten to market by the Hornby LSWR brake van, hmmm. Although they still haven't got the colour quite right.

     

    ...and Bachmann did a Midland brake van a few years back, albeit it's another late one from immediately before the grouping- their MR/LMS van is the late Midland design that carried over into LMS production (D1658/9 IIRC) .

     

     

    • Agree 3
  5. 12 hours ago, nathan70000 said:

    The idea of generic brakevans probably isn't a bad one- there were several companies that used very similar designs. I think the SECR and the Midland definitely had identical brakevans and there was a WD/ROD design that was used by a number of companies. Perhaps a generic underframe with two body styles would give you brakevans for the GN, LNWR, SECR, LBSCR and the Midland? Really, all those pre-grouping PO wagons Hornby churn out are "generic" so brakevans would be a logical extension. SECR modellers in particular have all the ingredients (assuming they're willing to do a bit of renumbering) to do an RTR layout, except the brakevan.

     

    Unfortunately if an accurate SECR brakevan were produced, it would inevitably be the Dancehall type, which, like Hornby's old LBSC van, is only suitable for post-1920 layouts. A generic, "period-literate" brakevan would look more accurate with pre-WW1 livery locomotives.

     

    An pre-grouping brake van could be a great idea - it's one of the key items to being able to do any kind of pre-grouping modelling.

     

    The trick would be not to fall into the trap Hornby have with their 'generic' Stroudley-ish coaches of producing something that's visually too specific to one railway to work as a 'generic' brake.

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  6. Just now, Legend said:

     

    Yes lighted coaches first appeared with their Mk2s in 1969 and then in 1978 they brought out the coach lighting kits for their new range of big 4 and BR coaches .  The issue with both was that it significantly increased drag . I see that as the main benefit of this battery system 

     

    Yes, increased drag was my main recollection of them, combined with a certain amount of light bleed glowing through the coach sides. Even as a teenager, I wasn't particularly impressed by them!

    • Agree 3
  7. 1 hour ago, TEAMYAKIMA said:

    Please forgive me if this has been commented on before, I will admit that I haven't read all 10 pages, but the most interesting thing about these coaches to me is the lighting.

     

    Are these the first Hornby (or indeed any UK manufacturer) coaches offered with lights? ANd battery lights at that.

     

    European manufacturers always used to offer lit versions - but British??

     

    Very interesting use of reed switches and the way they can easily be retro fitted by the end user.

     

    I am aware that similar component parts for modellers to use to make their own lighting units are offered by small suppliers (I use them myself in my HO stock) but to have a ready made product seems a breakthrough and a first for Hornby but I may be wrong as I don't model 00 any more.

     

    Hornby certainly used to offer a coach lighting kit as an add-on back in the 80's- I've got a couple of the LMS 'Stanier' coaches from my teens lurking in the loft which I fitted with them -from memory a couple of strips of metallic tape inside the roof with the bulb(s) stuck to them, and wires leading to a plastic moulding clipped to the underside of the bogie, with brass plungers to pick up power from the rails. I don;t remember them ever being offered factory-fitted though

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  8. 8 hours ago, The Johnster said:

    The crate gives it away as the old Airfix Lowmac but I think the chassis and buffers have been improved over the years.  I've never liked the crate; it is small enough to be carried in a lowfit and does not need a Lowmac/Loriot; these were specialised wagons for loads that would have been out of gauge carried on normal wagons, so why provide it with a load that is not at all out of gauge?  Is the excuse that it's a return load?

     

    Also, it's difficult to remove from the wagon so that you can run it empty or put a more suitable load on it, or at least the old Airfix one was, glued very firmly on and left a bad mark when I eventually prised it off.  The wagon went the way of all flesh many years ago but I've still got the crate in a box somewhere...

     

    From very vague memory, on the Hornby one I bought about 15 years ago, I think they'd progressed from glueing the crate on, to a plastic moulding that the crate slipped over, which in turn was stuck to the wagon bed with a double-sided sticky pad or tape- Certainly I did manage to separate wagon and crate without leaving permanent damage to the finish of the wagon. As you say, the crate never really looked right on a Lowmac, and I've usually had a vehicle of some description on mine

  9. 12 hours ago, Invicta said:

    The '12-Ton' branding and wagon number seem to suggest that what Hornby have actually looked at is an LMS D1927 3-plank, as per the Ratio kit or Mainline/Dapol/Bachman RTR, which is a slightly larger beast than Hornby's little 8-tonner!

     

    12 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

    It's typical of Hornby with these 3-plank, 4-plank, and 6-plank wagons to score such near-misses, which is a shame. It smacks of laziness, I'm afraid.

     

    A bit of further digging reveals a 1939-dated photo in the Essery LMS Wagons vol.1 of a D1927 in exactly this livery combination of small post-'36 lettering style on a pre-'36 grey wagon, with a number not far away from Hornby's release - The caption suggests a number of these wagons were thus painted in 1937, so it's another case of a correct, albeit unusual, livery applied to the wrong wagon. 

     

    As you say, a bit lazy, given that looking in the correct book could have given them a more accurate combination.

  10. 10 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    Fair enough. A decent reproduction of that "livery" (perhaps "condition" would be a better word) would be a worthwhile exercise. 

     

     

    It's typical of Hornby with these 3-plank, 4-plank, and 6-plank wagons to score such near-misses, which is a shame. It smacks of laziness, I'm afraid.

     

    Indeed, it's always frustrating when they pull off these near-misses- one numbered as an ex-Midland 3-plank, which is rather closer to Hornby's tooling (I've supplemented my Slater's kitbuilds by repainting a couple of the Hornby 3-planks over the years) in a  more typical livery would have been much more useful.

     

    I quite like the occasional 'oddball' livery on a wagon, but it's the kind of thing I do as a repaint or on a kit. If I'm buying RTR, then the more typical and standard the better, although a scruffy patch-painted grey one with the later lettering would be very tempting!

    • Like 1
  11. 14 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

    "Plank wagons"? What?

     

    That LMS 3-plank dropside livery is a real oddity - there seems to be an obsession with black ironwork on the 3-plank wagon. Anyway, with the 1936 lettering, the wagon should be bauxite. Why not letter it LMS in the 1923-36 style?

     

     

     

    Apart from the spurious black ironwork, I've certainly seen photos which suggest the 1936-style lettering on a grey wagon- there's an example in the Essery Midland Wagons book of a D305 3-plank which the caption says is grey with the later-style lettering- and very obvious squares on a weathered wagon side where the original 'LMS' has presumably been patch-painted out, and faint traces of the original lettering showing through.

     

    The '12-Ton' branding and wagon number seem to suggest that what Hornby have actually looked at is an LMS D1927 3-plank, as per the Ratio kit or Mainline/Dapol/Bachman RTR, which is a slightly larger beast than Hornby's little 8-tonner!

    • Like 1
  12. 1 minute ago, phil-b259 said:

     

    Yes but would that have been a good move for Hornby's coffers?

     

    As we keep having to remind people, Hornby make what they think will turn them a profit and maximise shareholder value - they are NOT in the business of increasing the variety of models just to keep modellers happy or avoid duplication for the sake of it.

     

    Given the demand / appetite for 'pretty' and small (which retail at lower prices) locos, having a range of 4/6 wheeled coaches to go with them is a sound business strategy.

     

    Whether they would have gone down this route in the first place without Hattons launching their 'Genesis project' and the positive response that generated is of course something that we will never know the answer too...

     

    Indeed, it probably makes perfect sense for them long term, but you can't help thinking it looks a bit like a shot across Hatton's bow, and I do wonder if that's how it will be perceived in Liverpool? Hopefully there is space in the market for both and neither are going to end up catching a cold on this- I can't help thinking though that maybe Hornby might have been better served by releasing some authentic Stroudley LBSC coaches for the Terrier, even if they then did go on to offer them in a range of non-prototypical pre-grouping liveries. 

     

    As the only 'London Midland' livery option they've put out in the first tranche is LNWR, I suspect my money will still be going to Hattons in the first instance. Let's hope the presence of two competing (or complementary) ranges of generic pre-grouping coaches doesn't push the prospect of some accurate RTR ones further down the road.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  13. 2 hours ago, MikeHunter said:

    I’d love to see an updated 2P and a 4F to modern standards. Something new for the LMS like a Fowler or Stanier 2-6-2 tank, and the Royal Scot coaches available in LMS crimson lake as part of their main range. A push pull set would also be amazing, and an LMS fish van.

     

    A state-of-the-art 2P would be very welcome, although I wonder about the 4F given the existence of a good alternative from Bachmann. The Fowler/Stanier 2-6-2Ts are one of the few remaining gaps in the LMS 'standards' offered by the manufacturers, so sooner or later, someone's bound to bite surely!

     

    A push-pull set is maybe one of the biggest gaps- although I wonder if there's more chance of that appearing in a blue box than a red one, as a logical follow-up to Bachmann's Midland 0-4-4T release (though I think I've said that after pretty much every London Midland tank engine release since the Ivatt 2-6-2T!)

     

    Fish vans would definitely be nice to have- and totally out of left-field, a retooled modern-standard version of the Palethorpes sausage van (and associated LMS Insulated Milk van) strikes me as the kind of thing Hornby might spring on us rather than a more obvious and predictable bit of LMS rolling stock

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  14. On 16/12/2020 at 18:05, Nearholmer said:

     

    There was a very good general model railway shop about two thirds of the way down Camden Road until probably c1980. Ballards were latecomers to the topic I think, always being builders' merchants that I remember.

     

     

    When did Ballard's finish? Oddly enough it's one of the model shops I never visited during the 20-odd years I lived in Kent, but I recall them doing a series of Dapol commissions of local PO wagons in the early 2000's, and I definitely mail-ordered at least a couple of these from them.

  15. 1 hour ago, DavidCBroad said:

    Until Covid Local Councils had to have two signatures on cheques so our Parish Council and Local Charity still pay by cheque, if you don't accept cheques then you don't get our business.

    I haven't paid by cheque for about 3 years, but I am for ever counter signing the damn things.

    They are good for traders in that they have the money before sending the goods, with credit cards the purchaser can often get a full refund and with PayPal the money can be snatched away again leaving a hole in your overdraft.   Selling cheques are good, buying they're bad.   Hows that for a balanced answer!

    Working for a County Council, most of our payments are made by BACS, but as a signatory on an office petty cash account, I still hold a cheque book for that, and both have to cash cheques at a local bank and write cheques to make payments fairly regularly- maybe once or twice a month. The vast majority of our purchasing though is either done through our central ordering and payments system and paid by BACS, or done locally on corporate purchasing cards.

    Away from work, it must be nearly 10 years since I even had a chequebook, much less wrote a cheque- although I have received a few in the last couple of years to pay in.

  16. 57 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    Interesting. My unsound red still showing as "pending".

     

    Yes, same here- ordered the red, and it's still showing as "pending", and no payment taken yet. I only pre-ordered in mid-November, (just after the  "Precedents" were announced, I pre-ordered both at the same time), so I'm probably quite a long way down the list they've got to work through. Must admit I've been pondering whether I needed to chase up in case something had gone amiss, but based on posts above I'm not panicking too much just yet...

     

    The Collectors' Club S&DJR one arrived on Friday though, and very nice it is too!

    • Like 1
  17. 1 hour ago, daltonparva said:

    Just been asked by Bachmann to pay for the SDJR blue ltd ed one.

     

    Yes, had the same email this morning, and just paid for it- Still waiting on news of the MR one I'd ordered from Rails, but as said a few posts back, seems they're inundated with pre-orders, so not panicking just yet!

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  18. 14 hours ago, Steamport Southport said:

     

    400 of them worked in the UK. A bit more than a few. With 400 in storage at Ebbw Junction.

     

    The eventual deployment of S160's were:

    174 to the Great Western Railway

    168 to the London and North Eastern Railway

    50 to the London, Midland and Scottish Railway

    6 to the Southern Railway

     

    So even the SR got them.

     

     

    Jason

    According to lnerinfo.com, the LNER's S160s were distributed between six sheds, across the Great Central, Great Eastern, North-Eastern and Scotland:

     

    25 at Woodford 

    50 at March

    21 at Stratford

    25 at Heaton

    25 at Neville Hill- these apparently wandered about a fair bit, as far afield as Hitchin and Edinburgh

    22 at St. Margarets

     

    A quick search found a couple of nice pics of S160s on Warwickshire Railways.com -  one on Nuneaton shed, complete with LMS (6D- Mold Junction) shedplate, and one on a coal train at Hatton on the GWR Banbury-Wolverhampton route

     

    OK. so their appearance on UK railways was fairly short-lived, no more than a year in 1943-4, but with 400 spread around the network, it wouldn't be that difficult to justify one if you're modelling that period- You can certainly put me down for one!

     

     

  19. 14 hours ago, MrTea said:

     

    For something a bit leftfield how about a new version of Caley 123, the single wheeler? They had one in the range years ago and it’s a pretty pre-grouping loco. 

     

    I also wouldn’t be surprised if there’s another small industrial logo as these have been good sellers for the last few years, maybe a Bagnall 0-4-0ST or another 0-4-0 diesel shunter?

     

    It's probably not even all that left-field, there seems to be a bit of momentum behind offering models of pre-grouping locos at the moment, and it's got a long history in the Hornby catalogue- and makes quite a nice follow-on from them retooling 'Rocket' last year- when they re-released the two singles and 'Rocket' back in the early 80's, IIRC they came out pretty much in consecutive years

     

    OK it's a one-off, but there are three livery options, it was in service until 1935 and it got about a fair bit during its' early 60's return to steam, so potentially attractive to the BR era modeller. I wouldn't be all that surprised to see Hornby do a retooled version of either the Caley or the GWR Dean Single in the next couple of years.

     

    I'd be amazed if we don't see another industrial this year, they seem to be very much flavour of the month at the moment- at the very least we'll get some new liveries on the Pecketts and Ruston.

    • Like 1
  20. 16 hours ago, New Haven Neil said:

     

    Well actually.....

     

    Bachmann did the 4F in this livery about 2 years ago.  I'm not surprised you missed it, as everyone else did too, they were bolted to our shelves!  Incredibly slow sellers.

     

    Edit - I think I miss-recalled this - it was Midland livery, with the crest on the cab side, my apologies.  Still awful seller though!


    As nice a model as it is, being plain black it lacked the 'shiny thing' appeal for collectors that something like the SECR-liveried version of the C had, and in isolation, with a lack of suitable RTR Midland stock to run behind it, as Phil suggests, it wasn't a particularly useful model in layout terms, so it's no surprise it stayed bolted to the shelves- (I suspect the LNWR version of the ROD 2-8-0 might fall into the same category?)

    Certainly I only bought mine because I had a reasonable number of kit-built pre-grouping wagons to run with it, and because the trader I bought it from at a show was selling them at a healthy discount.

    Even then it was bought with half-a-mind to tweak it into the early LMS goods livery to match the AIrfix 4F I repainted about 20 years ago, until I picked up a secondhand MR-liveried OO Works 2F last year to give it a shed-mate, so it'll stay Midland now.

     

     

    14 hours ago, phil-b259 said:

     

    Indeed - but at the time it was released there was no suitable RTR stock to go with it

     

    A few years later a Midland Railway brake van appeared but thats about it.

     

    To make such a humdrum loco 'work' as something people will want to buy Bachmann needed to follow it up with some other Midland items (i.e. some MR passenger stock and a ordinary MR passenger loco) allowing a proper Midland Railway model to be made*

     

     

     

     

    The 1P maybe moves that on a bit towards an easy way into pre-grouping modelling- If you've got the Bachmann MR-liveried 4F and brake van and a few suitable PO wagons,  add the 1P, some Hattons Genesis coaches when they appear next year (or the Ratio MR coach kits), and a few Slaters Midland wagon kits, and you've got a basic starting point for a small Midland layout without too much in the way of kit-building. 

    • Like 2
    • Agree 3
  21. On 27/11/2020 at 12:05, phil-b259 said:

     

    The other big omission is anything in the early LMS freight livery (unlined black with large numbers on the tanks / tender and a small pseudo LMS red plate on the bunker / cabside.

     

    As others have said with the higher prices these days I am having to be a bit more cautious in what I buy - and WW2 austerity LMS liveries are not something I will be spending money on.

     

    I'm quite surprised they've not done that one as well, with the 3F, 4F and ROD as prime candidates- I did buy one of their LNWR-liveried RODs earlier this year with just that thought in mind, although it might just stay as is, and some of my stash of suitable wagon kits might get built in pre-grouping rather than LMS colours instead when I get round to them.

     

    To be honest, I wonder if there might be a degree of method in Bachmann's madness of releasing LMS locos in WW2/postwar unlined black- That late LMS wartime-to-nationalisation period is a market niche that Bachmann occupy quite strongly with the Ivatt Moguls, Ivatt and Fairburn tanks in their catalogue.

     

    Having all of those in my collection, as much as I'd like a Crimson Lake Compound, I had no doubts about buying a black one to keep the Ivatts and Fairburn company, and I've only been put off the black 0-4-4T so far because I allowed myself to get distracted by both the Midland and Collector's Club S&DJR versions and really couldn't justify all three at once. It's fair to say my officially pre-war LMS modelling can be a bit flexible both in geographic location and period....

    • Like 3
    • Agree 1
  22. 21 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

     

    No. 54 / 1305 was withdrawn in August 1931, so not for long! "Hand painted insignia on the blue livery" [S. Summerson, Midland Railway Locomotives Vol. 3 (Irwell Press, 2002) p. 109]. Presumably this was done at Highbridge?

    Yes, it seems to have been done locally- Essery & Jenkinson's Illustrated History of LMS Locomotives (vol. 1, p. 212-3) refers to this as a 'Highbridge style', although they suggest the repainting of insignia was for the most part done at the sheds. The hand painted numerals are described as being "of a style rather like the new standard pattern but not quite the same. It was executed in yellow and varied in height according to the class of engine" and accompanied by hand painted smokebox door numbers in the absence of new plates.

    The accompanying photo shows No. 54/1305 and 1202.

    • Thanks 2
    • Informative/Useful 1
  23. 21 hours ago, cornelius said:

     

    Thanks, glad to hear your interest!

     

    The independent East Kent Railway had one which ran in green, as mentioned above. This made it into British Railways ownership but it's believed it never carried its assigned BR number and was scrapped in 1949.

     

    Having said that, an olive green one for e.g. Southampton docks post-war sounds like plausible freelance...

    There's a photo in the Lawson Finch East Kent Railway book that according to the caption shows No. 4 at Ashford in 1949, with cutting up in progress- the valve gear and upper part of the cab have been removed, and it's definitely still wearing EKR livery

     

    As I've just started work on a small test track/shunting plank, one of these will definitely be joining my industrial fleet- and even with the cab height discrepancy mentioned earlier in the thread, EKR No. 4 might be too tempting to resist

     

     

  24. First train set was the Triang-Hornby RS601 'Steam Freight Set' from the 1970 catalogue- Jinty, London Brick bogie wagon, Bogie Bolster with 3 Thames vans, 'Johnnie Walker' bulk grain wagon and brake van.

     

    http://www.hornbyguide.com/item_details.asp?itemid=560

     

    My birthday falls shortly after Christmas, and I don't remember whether it was that Christmas, birthday or even the following Christmas, a passenger train got added- 'Princess Elizabeth', BR Mk1 BSK and a Pullman, and somewhere along the line we acquired a Freightliner terminal and thre circle of track, plus a siding got nailed down onto a board. That didn't reign long, and the stock got packed away in the loft, to be resurrected in the late 70's when we built my first 'proper' layout, on a 6x4 of chipboard

     

    I've still got a fair bit of it- the Jinty, London Brick wagon (both of which suffered multiple repaints when I first entertained thoughts of becoming a 'serious' modeller in my teens!), bogie bolster, Princess and coaches are still stashed in a drawer in the loft, although neither loco has run in at least 30 years. 

     

    One thing noticeable is that bit of joined-up London Midland thinking by Mum and Dad when they bought my first extra loco, which seems to have stuck with me ever since- although subsequent stock purchases in my early teens remained a bit random (Hornby B12, Black 5, Class 25, then when Mainline and Airfix came into the market, J72, Warship, Royal Scot and 4F), I've always been mainly an LMS/LMR modeller.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...