Jump to content
 

tomparryharry

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    4,844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tomparryharry

  1. Thank you everyone. This has given me some ideas. It sounds like the solid chassis isn't really suitable for modern motors. The 2021 is so small that even the suggested X04 looks like a very tight fit. I'll give Gibson's a call about their frames. I've also got a Nu-Cast 64XX which has the updated chassis with greater detail. I think the two kits were both originally manufactured by Cotswold, so it may be that the later Nu-Cast chassis will also fit the older 2021 - as Horsetan points out the original locomotives had the same wheelbase. A comparison of the model chassis would be interesting.

     

    Thanks again all.

     

    Hello,

     

    If, as some have suggested, you decide to 'discard' the Cotswold/Nucast blocks, I would be very happy to purchase them.....

     

    Kind regards,

    Ian

  2. Hello Peter & Mike,

     

    The box lost about 6" in the transfer to Caerphilly. I knew this, as the lead off timber was at ground level, instead of being much higher. When I started at Caerphilly, they were about to scrap the box, as no-one was interested in seeing it restored. The locking engineer at Newport still had spares! The original down distant at Rhiwderin lasted well into the eighties, still with its somersault apparatus. I understand the 11 lever frame is still with the surviving Caerphilly guys, now located at the Gwili Railway. The reason that the box is much altered is because a lot of it didn't make it out of Caerphilly; At least, I seem to remember that most of the basement stayed after the Teifi had removed the top of the box.

     

    Non standard slates on the roof.... I seem to remember them being narrower than the standard sizes.....

     

    Regards,

    Ian

  3. Having seen Redgates photos of the Standard 2-8-2, I could well imagine a 3 cylinder (Caprotti) 4-8-2, for the west coast traffic. Oil fired, as the firing rate is probably too high, or mechanical stoker.

     

    Not too many in the class, so they are named after? Well, you decide.....

     

    Regards,

    Ian

  4. As I understand it, 3099 would be a suitable number for a non-westernised locomotive. If I've read RCTS 10 correctly, they did run for a while with both ROD & GW numbers. The GW number was painted on, I think, to resemble a GW numberplate.

     

    Personally, wouldn't mind seeing an ROD with No 6000, that would be a good one to get some ""Highly Informed"" people jumping up & down!

     

    Ian.

  5. I can think of two. There was a sawmill on the Cowbridge Railway, at Ystradowen. In addition, it also had a narrow gauge tramway. The business was owned by a Mr. Roberts, who also loaded timber at St.Athan Road station, and Beaupre House, on the Aberthaw railway. A lot of the London Extension (GCR) sleepers came from the Radnorshire area forests.

     

    Not to mention the Scottish traffic....

     

    Regards,

    Ian

    • Like 1
  6. A couple of odd ones were to be seen in the East Kent coalfield, working from Sheperdswell exchange sidings to Tilmanstone. They were ex-GWR fitted 'Toads' with footboards removed, presumably because of clearances in Golgotha tunnel- I'm not sure whether they were used as brakes at the end of trains, or as 'brake-force' vehicles at the train head, as the photos I've seen show them standing in the exchange sidings.

     

     

    Aaah, the Tilmo Toads!! Does anyone have a photo of the beasties? Pontypool & Blaenavon Railway have a gala in September, and I would like to paint our toad into NCB colours, to match the occasion.

     

    Regards,

    Ian

×
×
  • Create New...