Jump to content
 
  • entries
    48
  • comments
    79
  • views
    28,205

Still Fiddling.... Layout, V3


dseagull

1,057 views

So after the last two plans I've been continuing to play around, and re-reading the excellent 'An Approach to Model Railway Layout Design - Finescale in Small Spaces' book which has given me so much inspiration for this project.

 

With that in mind, and a nagging 'is it the best use of space' thought in the back of my head regarding 'V2', see Version 3 below.

 

blogentry-723-0-61029300-1368652757_thumb.jpg

 

This borrows shamelessly from Iain Rice's 'Witheridge' plan in the aforementioned tome (Page 44, and sadly I can say that without even having to look it up!), in that the station becomes a 'Bitsa', with the runaround loop moved into the yard to make things a little more interesting and operationally engaging. It fits all of my 'wants' in, at the expense of losing the 'river' frontage (which was, in any case, causing me a few headaches, especially with the proposed Jigsaw construction).

 

Scenic Thoughts

 

As I mentioned, this plan does borrow somewhat from 'Witheridge' - in particular, the arrangement of Station Building acting as a view block for the hole in the sky, a tiny hint of fence, then a loco shed. Small sheds like this - more of a 'shed to cover a loco' than a true Engine Shed of the 'depot' variety weren't uncommon (As far as I know! - there was one until the 1880s at Hailsham, for a start, which was similarly placed to this one). In the previous paragraph I mentioned that this one loses the river frontage - however what it will allow me to do is fit in the start of the sloping downland at the back, which along with the river, is a key feature of the area - though unfortunately I think that without adding another 2-3 foot (and that's being optimistic!) in depth, the 'White Horse' would just look silly.

 

Operation

 

Passenger services would pull in to the platform from the left, with the loco running Bunker-first. This would then be hauled into the upper part of the loop, loco detaches, runs around and pulls the train back into the platform before heading off to Alfriston again. Goods workings to the Shingle loading sidings at the Haven would obviously run straight through, whilst local goods traffic would be split in the loop (or platform road) before being taken off to the 'general' siding, the coal siding or the brewery. I did think about a slip, rather than the 'ladder' of points, but thought it a little 'expensive' for such a small station. Again, everything from Alfriston (With the possible exception of the shingle trains, as there would be a loop at the loading area) would arrive bunker-first.

 

Your thoughts are, as ever, both welcomed and appreciated! :)

  • Like 2

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

Hi dseagull, this looks good to me, although others will be better than I at judging the operational integrity of the layout.

 

I do like the very simple engine sheds that you mention. It would make a great little modelling project and provide lots of character to the scene. My favourite is the one at Newcastle Emlyn:

 

http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/n/newcastle_emlyn/index6.shtml

 

Pete Morris did a nice model of it once, seen here:

 

http://gwr.org.uk/layoutspentrecwrt1.html

Link to comment

Thanks All - I like the way this one 'flows', to my mind it looks more prototypical than the previous ones.

 

Mikkel - Thanks for a useful couple of links! - I have the AC Elliott book on the Cuckoo Line, which has a drawing of the similar structure at Hailsham, so may use that, but if not and I go something more freelance, it would be like the one in the link! - Very characterful, and a lovely looking model by Pete Morris too.

Link to comment

Job; I think you are right in that this plan would make it more suitable to go with the Jigsaw approach - but perhaps one slight amendment would make it even easier;

 

If I changed the point leading to the headshunt for the coal siding (marked on the plan as having the Goods Store and Yard Office alongside it) to a right hand, rather than a left, having it running parallel to, and curving slightly with, the lower of the 'loop' roads, it would make the track area a lot thinner, and therefore, (perhaps) easier to go with this method?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...