Jump to content
 
  • entries
    48
  • comments
    79
  • views
    28,206

Yet another variant - or two...


dseagull

399 views

As mentioned in the last post, I'm still fiddling with the trackplan. '3' was definatley my favourite - until I considered changing the orientation of the bottom set of points;

 

That resulted in this - 'Version 3B'

 

blogentry-723-0-12099300-1369086635_thumb.jpg

 

Whilst fiddling with that one, however, and having a re-read of the A.C Elliott 'Cuckoo Line' book, I noticed from the plan of Hailsham that the Cattle Dock was behind the platform. I still liked the idea of the Engine Shed as a view block though, so after much moving around, I came up with something a little more radical. This one also swaps the 'direction' of the layout - giving passenger services a longer run;

 

Version 4

 

blogentry-723-0-41019700-1369086777_thumb.jpg

 

This one has also been designed a little more with the 'Jigsaw' in mind - requiring just one joint, on plain track, in the 'track section' (at around the 4' mark), with the sloping downland moved from the rear to the front of the layout. As I've just noticed that I haven't captioned it on the picture, the black box at the top represents livestock pens.

 

Or, finally, there's this...

 

Version 4b

 

blogentry-723-0-36844200-1369087371_thumb.jpg

 

Which gives a longer stretch of river again. And having come full circle, I suppose I should pick one, take some photos of items I plan to sell in order to fund the beginnings of the project, then move on from pure planning and think about making a start?

  • Like 1

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

From a visual point of view, I like the curve on 3B, and how the river is oriented so that a viewer would look along it from the front center to the r/h corner.

 

But the jigsaw solution to 4 seems clever...

Link to comment

Thanks Gents.

 

Mikkel

 

The issue with '3' (Both 3a and 3b) is that a point crosses the 4' mark, where there would have to be a baseboard join to enable the layout to be transportable. Rejigging it using a double slip and a small radius point does avoid this, however.

 

4 ticks nearly all the boxes, but loses the natural curve as you've mentioned. So what does '4B' on a curve look like. Best of both worlds, or an edit too far?

 

4b

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

That looks good to me. But I am no track layout expert.

 

The river at the back: I think the trees would look good there, but I wonder if the river would be at all visible from eye level height? Or maybe that was part of the point? 

Link to comment

Thanks Mikkel. I was planning on having a road cross the river (where it goes 'off scene' and vanish off-scene behind the trees, so I think you would see it - perhaps move the two bigger trees, next to the track, to the other side of the line to hopefully hide the fiddle yard exit?

 

As for eye level viewing - it will be, to a point - I am 6' 4", so if I set it for 'my' eye level, then a lot of people would just be able to see some interesting layout legs..! - so it would have to be less than eye-level for me I think!

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Right, I see what you mean. The road across the river sounds like a good idea.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...